Auction "Golden Section", September 26, 2009

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

SAH, still life "Peony bouquet, lot number 58 O. Sleshinskogo really was exhibited at the last lifetime exhibition of the artist you specified muzee.V it clear None. lot number 131" Tiraspol area "- not Sleshinsky. And whence he emerged not known.
From Tsvetkova only lot number 128 "Lilac" does not cause somneniy.Ostalnoe-rehash. There are great doubts about GM Malyshev, Yuri Kovalenko. And now, about lot number 86 - no somneniy.Ne Strelnikov VV

[SAH]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

There are great doubts about GM Malyshev, Yuri Kovalenko. And now, about lot number 86 - no somneniy.Ne Strelnikov VV

I argue with you I will not, I am told by provenance of this work, I have the facts you can easily check, in addition add, I have personally seen all the original work (nearly 150) who sold the relatives Strelnikova through AB Among them was this work. What are the arguments you I do not understand? Also, do not understand why GM Malyshev, Yu Kovalenko absolutely typical of these authors also cause you somneniya.Naschet O. Sleshinskogo № 131 say nothing uncertain. Tsvetkova number 128 work early, others later, respectively. This link can also be seen Strelnikova http://www.slav-nonart.com/paint.php?page=strelnikov

[Tana]

and publiket whether the "Golden Section" results of the tenders?
It would like to have them.
SAH will show sales of expensive-inexpensive (unless of course we can hear the results).

[Артём]

Сообщение от VYACHESLAV

rest-rehearsal.

Good selection, there is no rehashing. Explain how the artist, why such a big price for Shishko lot93 (usually sketch) and how to hit Krotov Yu in line with such artists as Glushchenko, Tsvetkova, Zakharov, etc.?

[SAH]

Сообщение от Artem

why such a big price for Shishko lot93,

Obviously the owner does not want less, and at prestigious auction when there is a surname, a possible reason for this. By the way work is good, a lot of air, now looked good.

[Артём]

Сообщение от SAH

obviously less than the owner does not want

                                 Apparently! Apparently! Probably!

[Tana]

Lot 76-Labenok L. "Still Life W Paper, 1944 pp. if the People's Artist of Ukraine Labenok LV (1927 - 2000), then it is not clear, it is that her 17 years, wrote?
Lot 77 P. Stolyarenko very unusual, and even 50th years!
but Tsvetkova beyond doubt, its like lilac.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Tana

Lot 77 P. Stolyarenko very unusual, and even 50th years!

He has many such works found in the style of Aivazovsky including. Everyone is used to impressionist works, but there is such academic Stolyarenko. Photo 1951. P. Stolyarenko.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Tana

Lot 76 Labenok L. "Still Life W Paper, 1944 pp. if the People's Artist of Ukraine Labenok LV (1927 - 2000), then it is not clear, it is that her 17 years, has written?

  Yes, weird and still life in 17 years, as a rule do not sign the picture, and the signature is not his.

[Pluto]

Сообщение от Artem

Yes, weird and still life in 17 years, as a rule do not sign the picture, and the signature is not his.

I'm not sure that the thought "... in 17 years, as a rule did not sign the painting" can be a weighty argument. On the coarse-grained canvas (sacking) was written in 1940-s and-60-e, whereas in the 50's mainly used for fine-grained canvas. So the canvas, in principle, corresponds to the time of writing. And at the age of the artist at the time of writing: as for me, it smacks of the composition curriculum statement. By the way, no one knows whether Labenok studied in any art school before enrolling in college?: Confused: