Render assistance to the victims of the terrorist attacks on March 29

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Admin

In terms of legislation, we simply can not do it. If the money received to our account as proceeds from the charity auction - we have one and only one opportunity to dispose of them - translated into the official account of victim assistance. Everything.

....
Similar things can be done only in private: a private person transferred cash to another private person. Other options simply do not.

Largely agree. If the money had been "black" - not a problem to transfer their bank transfer at least in Tajikistan, at least in the U.S.. Sam did not do this just for the Tajiks, Uzbeks.

But I would not strongly believe in horror stories of our lawyers. My experience is that they often malospobnye people, "troeshniki" on education and in life. Faced such times. As, however, and in any other case a few good professionals. With talented artists - no more than 10%of all members of the SC that good builders - also from 5%to 10%at best.

I can offer such a legally clean alternative: The Administration agrees with the official foundation of the organization of targeted assistance. It consists of legally pure contract in which one party undertakes to provide charitable assistance, and the other provides information about victims. After that money is transferred directly to the private account of an individual affected by the terrorist attack. In the payment order shall be stated under the "Payment" something like this:
"Charitable assistance is not taxable, the payment for Charity Foundation" XXX. "Such payments are often made in business, where one organization pays for the other directly. This is a common phenomenon, not a problem legally. Of course, the required legal study my proposal.

[Anaconda]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

And this is not terrible, pay for this tax kc quite small.

Understandably. I thought CC generally not subject to export))

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Anaconda

The fact that I can wait another exhibition of my artworks - bring hand luggage or I'll make Moscow. If there is something for customers (already have an interest in 61, 79, 80), then mail. From Moscow, Russia Mail delivers relatively quickly, inexpensively and without problems.

Hurry up with the lot in 1961! I want to see him live. Perhaps presume to buy him a pair to Lot 60. But not yet sure.

If you take yourself - no problem with the withdrawal will not be. You're not going to export smuggling. Personally, I am not one now moved across the border - most importantly, be confident in themselves and not to yield to possible provocations customs. On one occasion, when I once crossed the border with three pictures. Hundreds of thousands of tourists take out the work of contemporary artists, a kind of artistic souvenirs of the trip. In any case, you can stock up check and invoice on the real price - it is a good argument on the question of a customs officer. But I have no such questions are not asked. Maybe because I go "green corridor"?

PS
It's so hard to distinguish from the original poster. Do you think that customs would bother?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Personally, I am not one now moved across the border - most importantly, be confident in themselves and not to yield to possible provocations customs.

Personally, you took out pictures from Russia without declaring their written form? On the "green corridor"?

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Do you personally took out pictures from Russia without the written their report? On the "green corridor"?

I do not infer or Malevich Shishkin.
I buy only contemporary artists that are safe in this sense for transportation.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

I buy only contemporary artists who are safe in this sense for transportation.

A route is like leaves, whether Shishkin, Pupkin if they are not specialists to distinguish between them, they have to show papers from the experts ...
You are in my direct question is not answered, incidentally.

[Мимопроходил]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Lot 27 is not bad: Radoman IV "Portrait of Yesenin, 1976.
I looked at him, too, but have decided to abstain because of the large number of lots already reserved.

Lot 87 - snug Portet. But I will not risk to buy expensive things online.

In general, the choice of an unknown man I endorse. Work-for-profit, but decent.

Yesenin love - the plot "radomanovsky, recognizable, hang over the table. And just like the Oaks.

[Anaconda]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

I buy only contemporary artists who are safe in this sense for transportation.

In my gallery regularly hosts exhibitions of contemporary Russian hudlzhnikov. "Welcome" Arbat whenever necessary. Even if the author himself unlucky as his work. First time I hear that modern artists "are safe for transportation." Do not specify? And we are always so much money and squander time.

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Do not miss a lot in 1961! I want to see him live. Perhaps presume to buy him a pair to Lot 60. But not yet sure.

Do not be greedy)))) you are so good "otovarilis"

[Сима]

Chernomashentsev Vladimir, I, too, these "forms" like. Not to buy, but would look with interest.

[Anaconda]

Сообщение от Sim

Chernomashentsev Vladimir, I, too, these "forms" like. Not to buy, but would look with interest.

Client, by the way, lamented that the second work there already. He would not hesitate to take two)) He did not take the other there, sure! So the case for the Administration)