Help with identification

[jurineo]

Dear Community
faced with a difficult problem. On a small and modest German auction was billed oil on wood 15 x 21 cm at which depicted a landscape that promenade in a certain coastal town. The terrain is mountainous. Of all инфы is only the date 1925 on the reverse side of the tree and zealously zeal owner - to prove that it Korovin.
I looked through all available sources, but unfortunately the horizons of my knowledge is clearly insufficient for identification. An attempt to appeal to a formal examination in the Federal Council has caused a smile - that if it dealt with such as Kirchner and Nolde, then we will be happy. Drop off has not yet sold a thing, for example, in Russia, in which some serious museum with adequate experts - just not realistic.
Now the question - why I thought of myself these adventures. Answer - a modest provincial auction (although not previously come across a very acidic finds) stubborn conviction of the owner is a very attractive price. As a result - and what never can tell?
Anyone who can help sort out this adventure will give thanks and show off both literally and figuratively.
Call now for connoisseurs.
Pre large merci.

Shl. Here are photos of this "miracle"

[vyadem]

jurineo, a very small picture ... and show the opposite direction.
And yet we are with you educated people: cultural write in "german" auction ...

[jurineo]

I used this turnover did not specifically nevertheless Sorry ...
Opposite direction can take pictures unfortunately only two weeks, as the owner of a vacation, although there is nothing special except "1925" is not available. By the way, that these quotes in the date to some degree I was intrigued, because the foreign works - it is not common. A little more than try to lay out a large-scale image. Thank you for your participation.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от god2012

Yes, there's no Lochy gathered

I'm already against you said))

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от god2012

I understand you plan to buy this masterpiece of world art for nothing and sell for millions of ...

Let's find a compromise - you are not going to burden yourself with the answers, but I'm not going to share with you my plans ...

[jurineo]

Dear Eugene,
I seem to have made a public apology for the so angered you, my unfortunate connotations, and believed that a precedent has been exhausted ...
Now, in fact - I asked the question to the community in the hope of all possible assistance. In response, yet was largely flood ...

[Konstantin]

Flood, we have removed, it would be correct if you are, and with apologies to mend his text.

[jurineo]

Сообщение от Konstantin

Flood, we have removed, it would be correct if you are, and with apologies to mend his text.

I totally agree. Already done.

[Konstantin]

That's good. Now make a better (bigger) picture, the back of the same, and always hear the advice. I for example do not make it out at all, although it can and is associated with age (age is not the joy). Korovin a forgery artist, without good provenance is better not to risk it.

[eva777]

I think not Korovin. He even sketches a better executed, and even later he did not write so carelessly his paintings. IMHO, of course.: Shy:

[Игорь Гурьев]

Sketch is very nice, and thin. level for this size almost corresponds Korovin.

But it can hardly Korovin.
He always had a clear plastic, maybe even too much, about what he wanted to portray.

Yes, and organization of space is not Korovinskoe.

I Korovin be some specifying smears ( "building blocks", so to speak) behind, and not just a vague something in the background.

And here - not even clear what is shown.

For example, what kind of "smoke" in the middle?

Right lower quarter of the paintings - all nonsense, impossible for Korovin: to fill a quarter of the Etude simple gray - this must think of.


In any case, such a picture, even if to prove its authenticity (which is unlikely), more than a few thousand euro worth will not.

[jurineo]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

sketch a very nice, and thin. level for this size almost corresponds Korovin.

But it can hardly Korovin.
He always had a clear plastic, maybe even too much, about what he wanted to portray.

Yes, and organization of space is not Korovinskoe.

I Korovin be some specifying smears ( "building blocks", so to speak) behind, and not just a vague something in the background.

And here - not even clear what is shown.

For example, what kind of "smoke" in the middle?

Right lower quarter of the paintings - all nonsense, impossible for Korovin: to fill a quarter of the Etude simple gray - this must think of.


In any case, such a picture, even if to prove its authenticity (which is unlikely), more than a few thousand euro worth will not.

I think that some people put in Zabluda midget picture. Unfortunately, I can not get a larger size, but on Friday promised to provide the auctioneer, including photos backside. Moreover, even kindly offered to send an excerpt from the Thieme /Becker 21, Vollmer 3. about this thing. How to get - to put up a decent resolution and it really look more closely.
With regard to color and space in the lower right part - it costs a small format. There is quite imputed roadway under the sun. But at the expense of "building blocks" agree. Korovin always had a concrete and rear plans are usually ordered in great detail, but here many of the sketch in haste, but in oil ...
In any case, if vestch still from Korovin, and not even be of commercial interest, perhaps a chorus will bring clarity and this has an open question. Also enjoy.