I will not argue with you - do not unnecessarily get involved in the technical side of the issue <!--~ a ~-->))
Yes, of course macro imprisoned under. but this does not prevent its use. would desire.
please tell us the plot, which will provide a picture of the cog-shpuntikov filmed close-up? maybe Still Life?
that will consist of a female nipple shot macro? maybe nu?
and piktorealizm where you assign the? and those who are negative even further processed manually and get the original film?
by pofodu pros - God forbid. Well of course. <!--~ A ~-->))
photograph seven years, is currently shooting pinhole 6 * 6 4 * 5, Yashica 124, Pentax 67, for figures using Canon, typing and not manually, do cyanotypes, and began to try Ambrotype. am in the Union of Photographers, participated in 20-30 shows, do not exactly remember the first journal publication and a victory in the contest was just a picture was shot tsifromylnitsey when they first appeared.
and about the pros - pros, those who earn money photography. now we have not all artists who use as a means of camera, earning a photograph. and not all who earn a photograph - the artists.
I have all this to the fact that it is important not what to shoot, and who takes. camera does not do snimaka independently. need someone to press the button. and how he clicks on it.
and let us all Well izoobrazheniya separate genre from the technical means by which it is received.
You know, at the Biennale in RM was podtemka "Sports", so here - the title for this podtemki was a photograph of my friend Roma Ekimov, taken them to the theater "Tree" and the sport no relation; staging gymnasts Genes Golovin on the background cloth and on the stool - also happily placed in the sport. They're gymnasts.
) so that it would be better without sports