Старый 18.05.2014, 00:38 Язык оригинала: Русский       #51
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,442 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23523
По умолчанию

Do Schwartzman was a good job and he has not made ​​his living painting interpretation could afford. In this case, you can keep any sort of bargaining position in price. Including the most uncompromising .

In 1997, the auction prices for paintings by Hirst were 5-7 thousand dollars Later happened and 1-2 thousand . But he became famous , of course, not prices. And innovation. I think that reliance on a wider audience sincere lovers capable of buying at low prices , more important than reliance on a few wealthy. Plus important to be able to slowly raise prices, as career development , as indicated by the article.
__________________
AI в Telegram: https://t.me/artinvestmentru

AI на Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/artinvestment



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение:
NATA NOVA (18.05.2014), Евгений (18.05.2014), Хранитель укропа (23.05.2014)
Старый 18.05.2014, 23:26 Язык оригинала: Русский       #52
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,442 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23523
По умолчанию

Formula " price = cost of producing x 2" contained in that article - it is rather grotesque. No one calls to take it seriously . It can be regarded as at least some variant . The person has ceased to be tormented and could not concentrate on work. It's better than " Leave me alone, no one has no idea how much your product should cost ." And convincing than formula " floor - finger - the ceiling ."

Цитата:
Сообщение от acetate ; 3124421"
I hope no one will deny the fact that the price of his work , as does not relate to " the primary cost = cost of production ".
Kohl Speaking of Hirst . Relationship is not strong, but it is the case when some correlation there . Well, for example , platinum skull with diamonds is unlikely to be cheaper raw materials . With a shark in formaldehyde ( " The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living " was also an interesting story. Samu carcass Hearst bought in Australia for six thousand pounds. Plus shipping , customs clearance services taxidermist , chemists, masters of aquariums - I think he's 30 thousand production spent . Maybe more. Shark in 1991 Saatchi bought for 50 thousand pounds. that is approximately the cost of production , multiplied by two. turns ? But 14 years later sold it to Cohen Saatchik 140 times more expensive. But this is a secondary sale - not considered .
__________________
AI в Telegram: https://t.me/artinvestmentru

AI на Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/artinvestment



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение:
NATA NOVA (19.05.2014)
Ответ

Опции темы
Опции просмотра

Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
Tell me, please, the author of the work and the price Алик Costs, valuation, attribution 13 03.11.2009 12:35
Tell me, please, the author of the work and the price in 1913. Алик Costs, valuation, attribution 2 02.11.2009 22:09
This is a copy of the work of the artist? allexx Costs, valuation, attribution 46 02.11.2009 19:36
Help identify the artist and the price Владислав Costs, valuation, attribution 1 10.10.2009 09:58





Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 11:48.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot