|
Appraisal Find out where and how you can get artworks appraised. Discussions related to fine art appraisal. |
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
26.07.2011, 10:38 | Язык оригинала: Русский #31 |
Бывалый
Регистрация: 07.11.2010
Сообщений: 414
Спасибо: 467
Поблагодарили 691 раз(а) в 269 сообщениях
Репутация: 1373
|
I apologize for the inaccuracy: the press conference "rigged in art" (p. 1)
|
26.07.2011, 10:55 | Язык оригинала: Русский #32 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,442 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23523
|
Цитата:
Последний раз редактировалось Vladimir; 26.07.2011 в 10:59. Причина: Добавлено сообщение |
|
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение: | Тихая Сапа (26.07.2011) |
30.07.2011, 22:27 | Язык оригинала: Русский #33 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 24.05.2009
Сообщений: 1,972
Спасибо: 4,937
Поблагодарили 4,308 раз(а) в 1,547 сообщениях
Репутация: 8082
|
Цитата:
Sooo want to know who among the participants of this fruitless debate really is an expert on the works of Natalia Goncharova after her departure from Russia? ? And on what basis our "experts" that any dispute in foreign publications? They should , first , to improve their own, so as not to disgrace ... |
|
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Маруся за это полезное сообщение: | SAH (24.08.2011) |
31.07.2011, 07:32 | Язык оригинала: Русский #34 |
Местный
Регистрация: 28.04.2011
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 125
Спасибо: 90
Поблагодарили 118 раз(а) в 62 сообщениях
Репутация: 236
|
Maroussia, you 're wrong.
speaking about the study of creativity Goncharova in Russia ( in the sense of our country, and not creative period ) it is not about one or two experts. is, if you want something like a school of \\\\ method and amount of information collected by different our experts for the entire period of study of the author , the story theme. subjective views on specific things , it's subjective opinion, this controversy and conversation , but the general trend of understanding of the issue , our specialists are the same. if you followed the science on Goncharova last 15-20 years , told off all collections and conference proceedings and monographs, then such remarks would not have arisen. see collections of the Russian Museum , the black edition collections of "science" and so on. but these do not have the novoissledovateley scientific basis for this theme , which is in ours. |
01.08.2011, 23:53 | Язык оригинала: Русский #36 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 24.05.2009
Сообщений: 1,972
Спасибо: 4,937
Поблагодарили 4,308 раз(а) в 1,547 сообщениях
Репутация: 8082
|
Цитата:
Her Russian period studied sufficiently well (the first names in Russian art history) and presented in our best museums. I wonder who of the participants, was holding at least one job, declared a forgery? Or decide on the photos? Or how do you propose? Then, in terms not far removed from our forum ... And who really is an expert on the late works of Natalia Goncharova? This is important because, in my opinion, it is impossible to make such statements without studying the works and keeping them in their hands. The argument that someone has not worked in our archives, I personally think funny. Because our experts have worked, but it did not stop them publish what they deem it necessary ... Archive - not a library, and there is such a document as a "sheet of" signs in him by anyone who looked through it, so fortunately or unfortunately, I have a good idea of who from our experts and used as received information in the archives. Dear Tiutchev, I have repeatedly tried to edit respected publications in the forum, hoping that they corrected the publishers. Only nothing happens. I am ready to answer for his every word, and name of publication, the authors and errors in them. Only is it "is someone who needs it?" At best, we are with you, as usual, banned because the authors are members of the advisory council site Art Investment ... |
|
02.08.2011, 03:32 | Язык оригинала: Русский #37 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 19.09.2008
Сообщений: 5,529
Спасибо: 4,883
Поблагодарили 11,835 раз(а) в 2,947 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 8
Репутация: 22524
|
Цитата:
Maroussia, I am interested to know your opinion. And I'll be grateful if you share your findings. I think the concerns about the discrepancy about your opinion of your expert opinion Artinvestmenta exaggerated. That's your opinion and you have every right to express it in the forum (well, at least, this applies to art and artrynka. It seemed to have no limits). Последний раз редактировалось Тютчев; 02.08.2011 в 15:49. |
|
02.08.2011, 04:12 | Язык оригинала: Русский #38 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 24.05.2009
Сообщений: 1,972
Спасибо: 4,937
Поблагодарили 4,308 раз(а) в 1,547 сообщениях
Репутация: 8082
|
Цитата:
You , too , I think you'll not trust the opinion of the first comer ... Therefore, probably the fifth time I ask, who is of Russian experts has researched and studied the work of Natalia Goncharova after her departure from Russia? |
|
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Маруся за это полезное сообщение: | Santa (02.08.2011) |
02.08.2011, 05:09 | Язык оригинала: Русский #39 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 19.09.2008
Сообщений: 5,529
Спасибо: 4,883
Поблагодарили 11,835 раз(а) в 2,947 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 8
Репутация: 22524
|
Цитата:
And yet, the study of Russian heritage Goncharova period provides many opportunities for the understanding of his French period. It is a powerful artist, and so solid (it is possible and vice versa). It was during the Russian artist asked his subsequent development, and not vice versa. It is in Russia to its roots. Who knows Russian Goncharov, that is not difficult to understand and with the French. But who does not know Russian period, he will "flounder about" in all its artistic heritage. Последний раз редактировалось Тютчев; 02.08.2011 в 15:40. |
|
02.08.2011, 05:22 | Язык оригинала: Русский #40 | |
Banned
Регистрация: 11.12.2010
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 1,968
Спасибо: 13,069
Поблагодарили 5,390 раз(а) в 1,566 сообщениях
Репутация: 10982
|
Цитата:
Tyutchev, it is very true you noticed ... It turned out, even once , solemnly ! I'll bet you - excellent! > Последний раз редактировалось Santa; 02.08.2011 в 05:24. Причина: Добавлено сообщение |
|
|
|
Похожие темы | ||||
Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
Your opinion: fake? | Pecheneg | Costs, valuation, attribution | 2 | 24.08.2010 09:17 |
Let's fake? | dedulya37 | Appraisal | 106 | 23.11.2009 17:11 |