Russian or western?

[Veronic]

Сообщение от bend

Veronic, dumate, the value of the canvas would have gone if I had attached to it is not the story with numerous quotations from Ilf and Petrov and drawn avatars anonymous, and the day before yesterday a check with many zeros hryvnia, HUF or other "leva"?

bend, I do not know whether the price increase canvases in HUF or in another currency, but your descendants will be interested in the history of its purchase by you.

[bend]

Сообщение от Veronic

bend, I do not know whether the price increase canvases in HUF or in another currency, but your descendants will be interested in the history of its purchase by you.

good idea. I will die - in his will describe the history of all purchases of all bequests.

this is the bugbear of art contemporary: painting itself may not be worth anything until they see if it is desirable to a dead author and the history of its purchase and resale.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 1 hour 48 minutes[/color]
By the way, I would venture to suggest that in 10-20 years, not only the history of speculation paintings will be the subject of study in economics class, but the authenticity of the paintings - the subject of study in school physics laboratories. And catalogs scans in high resolution, data on the analysis of the spectrum and other database components now password protected resources are paid - will be available in the public domain.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Such a "mechanism"?


This is not a "mechanism" and "fantasy" man is not in the subject.

  
    Kirill, it is you are not in the subject, because this is the "mechanism" is quite - yet often used for promotion, as a rule, contemporary artists. Why is modern, but because their works are often are concentrated in some (or many) hands (hedge funds, the heirs, dealers, etc.). Imagine that the pictures, for example, Serov or Raphael who are either not in sufficient quantities for such manipulations impossible. Masterpieces of the real masters - the geniuses come into the market very rarely. Years and even decades of waiting for the real art collectors and not always wait!
               When - that Malevich sold at auction Phillips outlined the price of this artist ($ 17,000,000) and then works on the market was a long time, though for this a long time the price of some contemporary artists, thanks to the efforts of interested dealers have been inflated to the sky (note the more natural process of cheapening money). Hence, the price distortions that give rise to confusion with sensible and really knowledgeable people. And, really, if you think about how the genius of Russian avant-garde may cost less or be a Hirst or Koons! All, of course, comes full circle! And all (or many) will sooner or later realize that the king - is naked! Extra confirmation of this - recently sold for an enormous amount of work Kazimierz ($ 60.000.000)! But if one considers that these masterpieces are rare, and human stupidity, on the contrary, frequent occurrence, the success shrewd businessman assured.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

You is not in the subject, because this is the "mechanism" is quite - yet often used for promotion, as a rule, contemporary artists. Why is modern, but because their works are often are concentrated in some (or many) hands (hedge funds, the heirs, dealers, etc.). Imagine that the pictures, for example, Serov or Raphael who are either not in sufficient quantities for such manipulations impossible. Masterpieces of the real masters - the geniuses come into the market very rarely. Years and even decades of waiting for the real art collectors and not always wait!
When - that Malevich sold at auction Phillips outlined the price of this artist ($ 17,000,000) and then works on the market was a long time, though for this a long time the price of some contemporary artists, thanks to the efforts of interested dealers have been inflated to the sky (note the more natural process of cheapening money). Hence, the price distortions that give rise to confusion with sensible and really knowledgeable people. And, really, if you think about how the genius of Russian avant-garde may cost less or be a Hirst or Koons! All, of course, comes full circle! And all (or many) will sooner or later realize that the king - is naked! Extra confirmation of this - recently sold for an enormous amount of work Kazimierz ($ 60.000.000)! But if one considers that these masterpieces are rare, and human stupidity, on the contrary, frequent occurrence, the success shrewd businessman assured.

An interesting topic for the blog author ...

[Евгений]

Tjutchev, I'm sorry, that is not on, it is possible your comments
"went on the inheritance pattern Konchalovsky's" http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...95&page=14

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

I'm the fourth square in his hands he held.

: eek: And how feelings? Very heavy?

[Евгений]

SergeiSK, Sergei, tomorrow is a holiday ...
Fourth square "is an option .. (In the hands to hold).

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

And as sensations? Very heavy?

In the pre-and in inkombankovsky period-light, as though, and two other things-self-portrait and portrait of his wife.
But before the auction of April 13, 2002-year-yes, harder, that is used. Your friend has already filed an application with the $ 10 million. A letter Petrakova in Gelos brought only on April 10.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 9 minutes[/color]
SergeiSK, but what is the problem? They brought something to our branch, brought people in Samara. I have Leiko was in the office several times and seen these things. Square took first in the 93-year. Later-portraits.
Well I know them all, and Lake, and Pasternak, and Field (but it is not enough, he did not Samara), unless, of course, you know who I mean. And to the bank, I knew them for "Argo".