Unlike J. Klever. Your opinion?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Artem

1902.

And where this date?
And what kind of examination? You do not give it all here? I do not see that there has been said about the authorship.
And who signed the examination?
Some questions ...

[Marjana]

Сообщение от Artem

La-la-la, poplar

And what are you rejoicing? Printing on the conclusion of the expert put on the signature, which she (print) assured. And certainly not on the printed on the printer on the same sheet of reproduction - and so it will not go anywhere. And shown on your letterhead - no names, no signature, and whether the expert? Yes, and a strange form. : cool:

I see that we have with Cyril Syzransky chorus talking about it

[Артём]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And what kind of examination? You do not give it all here?

    Cyril! Course not all. I was interested in your opinion!

[uriart]

Expertise signed by these "experts" originally said to the contrary!
If it says, the true, read "bullshit"!

[Евгений]

uriart, is unclear, restorers experts? And they have a comparative base for Yu Yu clover, or from books written paper? Technology opinion on the picture is clear, it is their specialty, but the authorship?

[наследник]

Сообщение от Artem

to wait a bit! Clearly, profi by Clover no. La-la-la, poplar. And for me, 10-ki cu What are the views of yet?

In their quest for Stepanova came in his time at the painting "Friends." Hussar with a horse.
  It was lined with the same conclusion, the Ukrainian Center that the picture was painted by A. Stepanov.
(You remember, as we have with Stepanov suffering, how many Stepanova! And here at once - AN)
It was written "remnants of signatures suggest that ... AN Stepanov.
And what do you think? There was no signature of the artist or her at least some visible remains! Although for ponta was accompanied by a certified picture fragment of a picture supposedly from the remnants of a signature.


The title of the Act written examination H /X, and the bottom is - "Stepanov.
I am not a connoisseur, but even for me, it became clear that the business of manufacturing such conclusions they have put on stream.

I will not argue that this conclusion on the Clover is a "registered", but in my case was.

Unfortunately we do not get to lay out hard - PC writes "invalid file".
=====================
We can not sow in Artema doubts about the genuineness of his things - belief in the possession of expensive painting above any reasonable dovodov.My already discussed ...

Although he himself wrote the title theme "does not seem to Clover"

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eugene

And they have a comparative base for Yu Yu clover, or from books written paper?

What do you mean by the term "comparative base"? Explain, please.

[Евгений]

For example, fund PP Konchalovsky.
-------------------------------------------
..... Due to high demand of work Konchalovsky on art market, alas, has appeared and a lot of fakes. Prevent their spread to the Expert Council Fund. It included well-known expert artist's career - Irina Gerashchenko, Tatyana Ermakova, Natalya and Andrew Avtonomova Sarabyanov. Head this Council Lydia Iovleva - First Deputy General Director of the Tretyakov Gallery. It is in the Tretyakov Gallery is a large part of heritage - more than 300 works Konchalovsky. And, as you know, at an expert study of the works in connection with the confirmation of the authenticity of an incredibly necessary comparative material, which owns and Tretyakov. Technical and technological expertise will be conducted in an independent expert of the company "Art Consulting". COA works Konchalovsky will be a document which forms printed in Goznak with some degree of protection. Forging a it will be difficult - in contrast to the current forms of expert opinions phenomena plaguing the domestic art market .......

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Eugene, it is understandable.
Here's how you react to the expert opinion of the museum at the picture of the artist, which the museum presented only one picture. Yes, and another period than provided for examination? For books did it mean?
The trust will personally you have such an examination?

[мистер-у]

This is definitely not Yu.Klever.Eto old job, not even artelnaya.Podpis marked dry sloyu.V colorful colorful layer during him.analiza no addition of pigment, which marked podpis.V addition, the reference to "Pigment works of the author is mistaken, and Art -Konsalting.V their reference database has errors.: