|
Art Kaleidoscope Interesting and relevant information about art. Discuss general art issues and any topics not covered in other forums. It’s only about art — love, politics, sports, hobbies etc. are discussed in “Chatter”. |
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
24.05.2010, 05:43 | Язык оригинала: Русский #21 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 01.07.2009
Адрес: город П.
Сообщений: 4,939
Спасибо: 6,544
Поблагодарили 6,620 раз(а) в 2,829 сообщениях
Репутация: 13305
|
Going back to the meeting (perhaps it was the spring of 1989 th).
Well, in general, we gathered Natalia Gorbanevskaya. I bought a case for such an expensive wine (as I remember, it was worth much as a hundred francs, in terms of Sovrem. Will be a Jew because Jews 30; and in France French wines at that price are very expensive). Here it is: Вложение 811901 Well, in general, to 20.00 all together, only Brotskava yet. They waited in a state of certain polunervoznosti another half hour. Then I say: -There is a known thing: we must open the bottle, and then called himself will come. In general, we are gathered here to drink and tagdalii, so let's do it, and if the Nobel lureat late, so let him drink what he will. And just when I opened a bottle, as fellow Nobel laureate rang the doorbell. I'm not trying to make, so it was. It is difficult to say just now, what year were "Chateau Maine. Most likely, 1985 or 1986, but certainly not 1984 (the year was below average). But it is possible that in 1983 ... I would like to think so, because at that time the 1983rd was my favorite wine a year ... 1982-nd, too, was nothing ... Ah, but what was the 1985 th! In general, I think, probably, still Chateau Maine, and was this year. In short, if anyone would drink Chateau Maine (this is a firm Cordier, that it produces, it produces a more Bordeaux wines, in general good, can not go wrong if you buy), then he can be sure that Comrade Brodsky drank it. Последний раз редактировалось Игорь Гурьев; 25.05.2010 в 14:13. |
25.05.2010, 09:26 | Язык оригинала: Русский #23 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 10.08.2008
Адрес: Russia, $ochi
Сообщений: 5,666
Спасибо: 1,397
Поблагодарили 6,208 раз(а) в 1,926 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 1
Репутация: 9994
|
"Pelmeni for many"
While it is well known, only one "business project" Joseph Brodsky: since 1987, he was co-owner of restaurant "Russian Samovar" in Manhattan. On the eve of 70 th anniversary of Poet (May 24) The owner of institution told Ogonyok "tastes a poet and why Brodsky had not received their share of profits
"Russian" New York, whose population, according to the most conservative estimates of statisticians, has caught up close to one million, in fact, can be easily divided into two unequal parts. Those who walk in the Russian Samovar, and all the rest. Restaurant, the first owner who was a poet Joseph Brodsky, dancer Mikhail Baryshnikov and a former art our companion Roman Kaplan, culinary critics have long referred to as the Russian monument in Manhattan, although in the heart of the Big Apple, you can easily find the kitchen a little better, and prices lower. And it is not in the 15 kinds of vodka brand own making. Just "Samovar" was never just a restaurant. Where else would you be able to see Dmitri Hvorostovsky, for example, performing with a glass in hand, "Black Eyes", or accidentally catch the Nobel laureate Derek Walcott, reading at a table in the far corner of the new poems? - The novel, about the "Samovar" tell the most unbelievable stories. According to one of them, you somehow used Brodsky as a "hack". Allegedly, he wrote in your letter to the journal, which then issued for your signature? - This letter was in response to an article in the magazine "New Yorker" in which a restaurant called "jack of the Russian mafia." Joseph then wrote the first version of the letter, and then we had a long argument with him, until finally completely disagreed with the arguments of the article's author. Because "Russian Samovar" is indeed a nest of Russian poetic and artistic "Mafia" in New York. And the letter actually published under my signature. The author then came to apologize, but was not adopted: here with quarrelsome people, we do not communicate. - By the way, many of those who had to talk, said that Brodsky never liked to socialize with people. Could easily offend his interlocutor, and in general was a man unpredictable.
Читать дальше...
Added after 5 minutes A writer, journalist Frida Vigdorova (1915-1965) led a transcript of the two trials over a pot of coffee on 18 February and 13 March 1964. The document received a huge response: its emergence and spread taken to count samizdat. In 1988, the transcript was published in Ogonyok "(N 14) (...) judge: In general, what is your specialty? Brodsky: poet, the poet-interpreter. judge: And who is acknowledged that you're a poet? Who enrolled you in to the poets? Brodsky: None. (Without the call.) Who enrolled me in the human species? judge: Did you study this? Brodsky: What? judge: To be a poet? Do not try to finish college, where they prepare ... where they teach ... Brodsky: I do not think ... I do not think that it gives education. Judge: And what? Brodsky: I think it ... (Perplexed) ... from God ... (...) judge: It is better, Brodsky, explained to the court why you are in the intervals between jobs did not work? Brodsky: I worked. I wrote poetry. judge: But it did not stop you working. Brodsky: And I worked. I wrote poetry. judge: But there are people who work at the factory and write poetry. What did not you do? Brodsky: But people do not like each other. Even the color of hair, face ... judge: This is not your discovery. Everybody knows that. A better explain how to interpret your participation in our great onward march to communism? Brodsky: Construction of communism - is not only working at a lathe and plowing the fields. This intellectual work, which ... judge: Drop high sentence! The best answer: how do you think to build their career in the future? Brodsky: I would like to write poetry and translate. But if it is contrary to some social norms, I take a regular job and still going to write poetry. (The magazine Ogonyok »№ 20 (5130) on 24.05.2010) Последний раз редактировалось SergeiSK; 25.05.2010 в 09:31. Причина: Добавлено сообщение |
Эти 13 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо SergeiSK за это полезное сообщение: |
25.05.2010, 11:34 | Язык оригинала: Русский #24 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 04.06.2008
Адрес: Сочи
Сообщений: 14,663
Спасибо: 18,865
Поблагодарили 16,455 раз(а) в 4,506 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 273
Репутация: 32442
|
Joseph Brodsky. "Rembrandt. Etchings"
I
"He was so bold, that sought know yourself ... "No more and no less as himself. To achieve this elusive goal he first armed with a mirror, but after, realizing that the main task not so much in order to see how much is to talk about what he has seen the Dutch, He took up etching needle is and began to tell. About what He told us? What he saw?
Читать дальше...
|
25.05.2010, 11:40 | Язык оригинала: Русский #25 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,442 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23523
|
Yesterday, the culture-K showed a documentary about Brodsky - are off-screen interviews with the visuals of the chronicles and photographs. At the end of Brodsky Brodsky asked whether he believed in superstitions. In response: "No, I'm not superstitious, although most trouble I had happened in late January." The conversation ends. And the final credits: "Joseph Brodsky died on January 28, 1996.
|
25.05.2010, 14:17 | Язык оригинала: Русский #26 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 01.07.2009
Адрес: город П.
Сообщений: 4,939
Спасибо: 6,544
Поблагодарили 6,620 раз(а) в 2,829 сообщениях
Репутация: 13305
|
Exactly 10 years after the explosion of Challenger. On the same day.
|
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Игорь Гурьев за это полезное сообщение: | Jasmin (28.05.2010) |
26.05.2010, 00:07 | Язык оригинала: Русский #27 |
Старожил
Регистрация: 13.03.2009
Сообщений: 542
Спасибо: 70
Поблагодарили 626 раз(а) в 157 сообщениях
Репутация: 1025
|
http://malutka-du.livejournal.com/
Brodsky as a mirror of Russian provincialism Nerve, essence, core, existence, the quintessence of Brodsky - provincialism. More precisely - the ideology, attitude and outlook of provincialism. Brodsky - more than a poet. He is the leader and ideologist of the whole trend in modern culture - provincialism. Actually, the fact that he was born in the provincial city of Leningrad, spoke for himself. And even could not continue. For cultural Muscovite is impossible to imagine a more provincial town, embodied the whole ideology of provincialism than "Peter". Leningrad became hopelessly settling the province as lost its status as capital. Deteriorated quickly, did not last a few months. Brodsky and a team of associates from his generation understood, in what turned out to be a dump. Therefore set ourselves the task of turning their own inferiority and uebischnost in celebration of the Nobel Prize. Possible. How? I had to try. The team Brodsky beautifully presented, that there is a huge untilled field - endless Sewer-USSR superpower - from Kaliningrad through Kiev, and Asia to Vladivostok. Hated stain that can not be removed, looked Moscow - "capital", where in contrast to the steel oblivion with might and main seething intellectual metaphysical life. The contradictions between capital (including cultural) life and provincial were glaring, glaring. Especially with regard to modern culture. In general, Peter had no idea who this Mamleev. Anyway anything have no idea. Brodsky understand that meddling in Moscow, and even more so to win it for the poet to his level - meaningless. The boy from the provinces too tough capital bison. Cultural Space of Moscow densely occupied taken lightly geniuses. From Gubanov Mamleeva, Zvereva, Rabin, Limonov to Gladilina-Aksenova-Yevtushenko. Then - everywhere, in every apartment (basement, attic, in the boiler room, lifterskoy) - for the prophet, and not with the provincial, and with the Capital mentality. Brodsky was aware that he is not Suvorov, to take an impregnable fortress. For the team Brodsky had no other options, as do the truly titanic work ideologically to seize anything that is not Moscow - simply speaking province, to become a leader in the periphery, to compile and build an absolute ideology of inferiority, and a banner proclaiming himself the leader of the fringe, but - with audacious oriented NOBEL PRIZE. No sooner said than done. Brodsky as a born accountant sat down and counted how and what to write and do to become (HAVE THE RIGHT to position themselves) as an ideology, an alternative Moscow avant-garde. It is clear that Moscow has always been weak on intelligence. Well, what of us "intellectuals". More so - in the 60's - 70's. We were - shamans, accusers, heralds, prophets, holy fools. Brodsky knew that to win you need only to contrast the capital irrationalism - the strict classical rationalism, dressed in a form of "ritmizirovannoy, zombiruyuschey erudition" - as an endless postmodern play on words, images, concepts, categories and meanings. What a postmodern, non-stop. People shavaet, because literature teacher from Ryazan, reading Gubanova or Mamleeva not sleep at night. It is therefore appropriate to offer her a smart, full of metaphors, but absolutely distilled to poetry. Brodsky's brilliant invention was ideal bait for the defective part of intellectuals - who are not read by the forces of "terrible", and prefer to solve "puzzles" and "crossword". What to invite friends brighten leisure, prepariruya someone unowned dead or at worst, to do group sex with invited homeless people, where the "ethical" and decent play puzzle type of Rubik's cube. The main thing - absolutely sterile and safe for women and children's psyche and at the same time creates a simulation of mental activity. Explain the popularity. Today the place is competently Brodsky D. Bykov. It is absolutely equal and consubstantial with him a literary figure of all Hypostases. Is that "his" NOBEL PRIZE got Brodsky. But no one doubts that he will get a million other prizes, which eventually will reduce the balance. By the way, inexplicable attraction and love for Venice Brodsky explained it was his undying, animals provincialism. By that time, as Brodsky arrived in Venice, the city, like the rest of Europe, has become a hopeless and the province of garbage. A sedimentation "former" city in Europe is impossible to imagine. Naturally, the passion for Venice Brodsky once again proved that he is - a singer and ideologist PROVINCE in the most wretched of its incarnations. In the passion of Brodsky to Venice embodies its complex provincial capitals in panic fearing their violent cultural and artistic life. Even as I was told, the poet was buried at a dump, which he was immensely pleased to advance. Brodsky feat that in his work he has compiled and accumulated all the quintessence of provincial thinking, presented in contemporary culture, to justify the existence Provincialism Ideology, has given its highest grandeur and brilliance of intellect, and finally got the idea for his loyalty to the service and the task of the Nobel Prize. His contemporaries - inhabitants of the capital - NOBEL PRIZE failed - again for reasons of the same poses on all of us political correctness - they say, will be the humanitarian point of genius from the provinces and the capital - as always wait. In Moscow's already all geniuses in sight. Where they go, basking in the glow of fame and success without Nobelevok. More humane will be noted and reward someone "from the slums". |
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо ранжер за это полезное сообщение: | Jasmin (28.05.2010), Игорь Гурьев (26.05.2010) |
26.05.2010, 02:01 | Язык оригинала: Русский #28 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,258 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29878
|
How can you Ranzher?
How can you compare Brodsky with Limonov, capable, certainly, very capable, but so ... In general, little interest Narcissus, with Mamleeva, which I like to call simply graphomaniac? Brodsky - poet (that's already under whose birth was not without Moose, or even the Muses childbirth certainly present himself Apollo), a poet, which appears in a century a handful. How can we remain indifferent to his stammering verbosity, his high stuttering, his focus and seriousness, his thoroughness, his absolute integrity? His poetry affects me like a drug, it puts me into euphoria. Incidentally, that same Leningrad gave us not only Brodsky, and Victor Krivulina, Lena Schwarz - not bad for a "hopelessly sucked province. In Moscow, poetry was different. Poziya in Moscow, wonderful - it Choline Nekrasov, Prigov-Satunovsky, Gena Aigi strolling by itself, and I'm very fond of them, but Brodsky, Brodsky - a whole world ... I do not want to argue. I only important to say that I agree with you I can not.
Читать дальше...
|
Эти 4 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение: |
26.05.2010, 07:06 | Язык оригинала: Русский #29 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 01.07.2009
Адрес: город П.
Сообщений: 4,939
Спасибо: 6,544
Поблагодарили 6,620 раз(а) в 2,829 сообщениях
Репутация: 13305
|
What is taboo?
In my opinion, an excellent text. And, in my opinion, there is an excellent text Limonov about Brotskava "poet-dogmatist" and tagzhe text Limonov about My favorite poet Anna Akhmatova, where he compares its vocabulary with a dictionary Ellochka-ogress. Wonderful lyrics! Another recommend texts Limonov about Galic (if someone did not read). And the other texts Limonov - strongly not recommended! =============== And if anyone thinks about art must have a unified opinion, he (tsenzored) ... wrong. In art criticism, and above all - honesty, rather than unanimity. Последний раз редактировалось Игорь Гурьев; 26.05.2010 в 18:31. |
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Игорь Гурьев за это полезное сообщение: | Jasmin (28.05.2010) |
26.05.2010, 08:00 | Язык оригинала: Русский #30 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 04.06.2008
Адрес: Сочи
Сообщений: 14,663
Спасибо: 18,865
Поблагодарили 16,455 раз(а) в 4,506 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 273
Репутация: 32442
|
Liana, you are as always right, and to argue the point? Time has placed all the places and St. Petersburg "provincial" and Moscow "grave geniuses" .. where are they? Brodsky and where ...
------------------------------------------- They tell me what to leave. Yes. Thank you. I'm going. Yes. I understand. See should not be. Yes, I do not get lost. Oh, what you say - a long journey. Any nearest stop. Oh, no, do not worry. Somehow. I'm traveling light. No luggage. Yes. It's time to go. Thank you. Yes. It's time. And everyone understands. Bleak winter dawn over the birthplace of the trees raised. All over. I will not argue. Hands to shake - and goodbye. I recovered. It is necessary to leave. Yes. Thank you for the parting. Take me to home, taxi. As if I forget to address. In a stopped field Bring me. I, you know, with the motherland eliminated. As if I forgot to address: to the window sweating priniknu and over the river, which he loved, I will pay the boatman and hollered. (It's all over. Now I'm in no hurry. Off you go back quietly, for God's sake. I'll look into the sky and breathe the cold wind of another bank.) Well, that's a welcome move. Katie ago, not feeling sad. When you come back home to the entrance, I have a gently sloping shore moorings. |
Эти 4 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Евгений за это полезное сообщение: |
|
|
Похожие темы | ||||
Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
Today Leonid Borisov turned 65 | Евгений | Artists, artworks, art history | 0 | 29.06.2008 15:05 |
|