Krasnopevtsev or not?

[ранжер]

Сообщение от K-Maler

Y Krasnopevtsev there is always some subtext ...

Interesting. What? Do not share?

In your opinion there is a subtext?

[U_Z]

Сообщение от Art-ort

In view of the degradation of examination, after 100 years will not tell ... and the beneficial owner prodastesli survive

I hope and wish that site http://forum.artinvestment.ru/ and after 100 years of prosperity and was relevant, and then, the grateful descendants will read these lines!

Сообщение от K-Maler

Y Krasnopevtsev there is always some subtext ...

Maybe someone will be able to sample the well-known works reveal the artist's intent. Very interesting, though.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от ranzher

Interesting. What? Do not share?

In your opinion there is a subtext?

  ranzher, overtones of this image can only express in one word: "falshak.


    Falshak:

[ABC]

Сообщение от artmig1978

please'll show where you can buy a separate three-volume catalog of works Krasnopevtsev under avtorstom Ushakov.

The Ekaterina Cultural Foundation "in the Lubyanka, 5400 for a set

[artmig1978]

Thank you

[qwerty]

Сообщение от U_Z

Maybe someone will be able to sample the well-known works reveal the artist's intent. Very interesting, though.

"From the sublime to the ridiculous - one step, but from the ridiculous to the great, obviously, the same amount. So the lack can be turned into a virtue. The point is that one step. That is a disadvantage for small artists - various errors in the proportions anatomy, perspective, dry, angular, infidelity colors, slapdash sketch, monotony, and much more - with great artists, dissolving in general, transformed by some miracle, in the dignity, the unique identity, its own style. " - D. Krasnopevtsev.

[ранжер]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

ranzher, subtext of this image can only express in one word: "falshak».

Ah yes Tyutchev, a fine fellow! What a pro! This pro Grandmaster!

However, what you said here so elegant word, not noticeably out of subtext, plain text shines - crude forgery!

You see, doctor, again, we put you on the form. At this time the girl Vikkeri and its consultants on this issue, headed by collector-deserved "poet".
Of course you remember this still life at one of Sotheby's sales.

It is a pity that the owner natyurmortika can not use your table by a competent, professional opinion. That professional prematurely and unexpectedly left us not so long ago. Until late last breath was sure that the masterpiece has Krasnopevtsev. Let's hope that this can be his heirs.

But your fellow professionals from neighboring so, undoubtedly, you must. You are so professional and convincing them to show that one should not too much to trust everyone there Sotheby's, Christie and other McDougal.

[Amateur]

Сообщение от qwerty

"From the sublime to the ridiculous - one step, but from the ridiculous to the great, obviously, the same amount. So the lack can be turned into a virtue. The point is that one step. That is a shortcoming small artists - various errors in the same proportions, anatomy, perspective, dry, angular, infidelity colors, slapdash sketch, monotony, and much more - with great artists, dissolving in general, transformed by some miracle, in the dignity, the unique identity, its style . " - D. Krasnopevtsev.

He remembered the thought of the great photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson (1908 - 2004): "The difference between good and average images - is a matter of a few millimeters, a very small difference. But the important one. I think that between the photographers is not much difference, but very important differences are small. "

Perhaps it applies to all artists.

[Konstantin]

ranzher - I did not understand you criticize or praise?
A picture of this "Krasnopevtsev" is in the base of our website:

The name Still Life
Date 01.12.2005
Auction house Sotheby's, London (GB)
Lot 211
Estimate 12 000 - 18 000 GBP (20 764 - 31 145 USD, 17 697 - 26 545 EUR)
The result is not sold

And is the red light. Here and connoisseur of great be no need, just look in the database.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Konstantin

ranzher - I did not understand you criticize or praise?
A picture of this "Krasnopevtsev" is in the base of our website:

And is the red light. Here and expert need not be large enough to look into the database.

Service ArtInvestment.ru - this is a very handy tool. But expressing an opinion on this picture, I relied on their feelings and experiences. Honestly, did not occur to look at the basis of sales site ArtInvestment.ru. We looked at it and really is a red circle. It's really very convenient. True to the database, it came only after it was put up for auction. Well, that thing was not sold. But could it be otherwise. Now, thanks to the fact that it is in the database, again hitting the market it is less likely to be sold.

By the way it is a very correct direction for the development of the site. Because the issues raised by ranzher, does exist. Through auctions sale a lot of fakes. And I think that their number will not be reduced to as long as the biggest auction will not begin to attract first-class professionals to identify falshakov. But where these professionals if we are in Moscow and St. Petersburg can not solve this problem. Yes, and then auctions not very interested in the truth. They need the sales. Therefore all, as always will depend on the professionalism of the dealer and the reasonableness of the collector but still a competent work on services such as site ArtInvestment.ru. Monitor and identify falshaki before they sell it promising, but not simple and low cost. While repeating that the forgery is detected even after the auction and this informed community is no longer a small achievement. Will develop the market and the Internet, and such services will grow along with them. Way there is something to think about.
 
P.S. And at the forum, colleagues will not lie, we constantly work together to expose durilki.