The alienation of the exclusive right in the work

[Ирина Ивановна]

Сообщение от K-Maler; 2605231"

Ie the owner of the product bought the item, and the author - permission to duplicate, forbidding it to others and to the author, too, or allowing, if they deem it necessary (for anything else buying exclusive rights is not needed, just enough permissions to replicate).

Not exactly: the owner of the product bought from the exclusive rights of the author of this work, to have the right product and then sell it to the specified type of contract, "" contract of purchase and sale of works of the owner, not their creator, and the transfer of exclusive rights to them in full . "

Сообщение от K-Maler; 2605231"

sold the rights, which are called "exceptional" by deprived of the opportunity to duplicate, publish, etc. independently, without asking the new owners. If he had just signed an agreement allowing the new owners to replicate without the use of the phrase "exclusive rights", it would mean that he can, as well as the new owners to use an image from his work as he pleases.

In fact of the matter is that the new owner is not interested in replicating oil on canvas. Buying a painting along with the transfer of exclusive rights to it, the new owner of the picture thus suppresses the situation (rather hopes to legally stop) when the artist starts churning out copies of the author's work, thereby reducing the possible future value of the purchased product.

Сообщение от Maroussia; 2606031"

I hope you do not have to be offended?

God forbid, you are my only help. Thank you all.
However, now I have another legal problem, shortly outline a new topic. Thank you in advance for your participation.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

" On which side should be the audience, the question arises as to whether the book such as" Robinson Crusoe ' or " Pilgrim's Way ' be in any home, or they should be imprisoned in the libraries of the rich for the benefit of great-grandson of the publisher , who paid a hundred years ago, a tiny amount of the author when he was in need? also bear in mind that if only a violation of literary property will cease to be regarded as reprehensible , no one can say how far it will go . audience rarely makes a successful separation such cases . "

Thomas Macaulay , A speech delivered in the House of Commons 5th February 1841

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky ; 2854991 "

for the benefit of great-grandson of the publisher , who paid a hundred years ago, a tiny amount of the author when he was in distress ?

This kind of inheritance is valid only a limited time after the author's death ( 50 70 years ), after which the work becomes public domain. That's right , the author should be able to own labor ( investment? ) Partially take care of their loved ones. This is - the same inheritance as money or property , it is work that has lock in tickets " to opportunities."

[Маруся]

Сообщение от K-Maler

This kind of inheritance is valid only limited time

Inheritance - is the transfer of ownership which is unrestricted


Do you really believe that the message of the COP reprint edition is unknown what oobsuzhdeniya

Added after 7 seconds

Сообщение от K-Maler

This kind of inheritance is valid only limited time

Inheritance - is the transfer of ownership which is unrestricted


Do you really believe that the message of the COP reprint edition is unknown what oobsuzhdeniya

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Maroussia ; 2856811"

inheritance - is the transfer of ownership which is not restricted

St . 27 of the Law of the Russian Federation copyright claim 1 : Copyrights effect throughout the life of the author and 50 years after his death ...
Art.28 ZRF : Claim 1 : The expiration of the copyright in a work shall fall into the public domain.
Claim 2 : Works that have fallen into the public domain may be freely used by any person without payment of royalties . This should respect the right of authorship, the right to a name and the right to protect the reputation of the author ( Article 15 ZRF )
Article 29 of the Copyright inherited. Not to be inherited copyright, the right to a name and the right to protection reputation. The author's heirs have the right to carry out protection of these rights . These powers are not limited to the heirs of the term .