Is Makovsky?

[vorea0083]

[serg_str]

Watercolor looks good, the story is known.
Perhaps Makovsky made it before writing the big picture.
The painting itself will be published in the re-release of Makovsky (eds. Golden Age), and stored it in the "Cultural Foundation, if not mistaken.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "serg_str

Watercolor looks good

And this is exactly the watercolor?
Do not print?

[serg_str]

Picture is bad and the raster is visible.
Signature is not printed impression.
It should be good shots, or look through a microscope.

[kr555]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

And this is exactly the watercolor?
Do not print?

No, not printing, even on those bad picture can say with certainty.
At least not printing.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от vorea0083

shortly before he was transported to another place as unnecessary and cumbersome

And what kind of "awkwardness"? What size is your thing?

Сообщение от vorea0083

How much it might cost (at least roughly)?

Should at least know the size.

Сообщение от vorea0083

I looked up the price of expertise - a bit too expensive (Does it make sense to bother?

And where the object itself geograficheskt?

[Евгений]

Dear vorea0083, normally decorate your post ..:
1. Author.
2. Material and equipment manufacturing (oil on canvas, paper, pastels, watercolors, lithographs, oil, pencil, etc.).
3. Size (horizontal x vertical for painting).
4. Date (1899 /early., Mid-twentieth century. Etc.).
5. Captions, labels, stamps, birochki (if any - need photos).
6. State (breaks, debris, scrapes).
7. Expert opinion (if available) - the organization + name experts.
8. High-quality photograph of the picture, the back side of the picture, photo captions (if any).
9. Origin of the picture.

[vorea0083]

Сообщение от Eugene

Dear vorea0083, normally decorate your post ..:

Dear Eugene,

If there was such an advanced, I would not have needed to seek the advice ...
In my opinion, is clear from the post and author and year: signed as Makovsky, 1884. Size does not tell you now, the picture in the country, and I am in Moscow, but the picture is big.

Replying to other questions: No, it did not kept under glass, if I knew the origin of the - I would probably know anything about authenticity. Geographically - Tver Region.
The "Techniques" I do not understand. And about eskpertnoe conclusion, I think, clear from the post - none of that - I'm writing about it and just ask - what could be the action in this case.
If a picture is worth roughly 5 thousand, then making the expertise of 60 thousand, to know that this is exactly Makovsky - I absolutely do not need, I'm not a connoisseur. Just looked on the internet other paintings by this artist and this image is not found among them - thought that maybe it is valuable for the arts.

[mihailovoh]

vorea0083,
By the technique of execution prompt you to any galleries or antikvarnom.Esli not want to do the examination and get the money .. do not ask how many thousands - will (just enough ), or the story on the wall and live deep conviction . Makovsky it .
On such ads. Obizhaytes.nikto you do not even about the authorship has not confirmed ..

[Painter]

Сообщение от vorea0083

Dear Eugene ,

If there was such an advanced , I would not have needed to seek advice ...
In my opinion, of the post is clear and the author and year: signed as Makovsky , 1884 . Size is not the tell , the picture in the country , and I am in Moscow , but the picture is big.

Replying to other questions : No , it did not kept under glass, if I knew the origin of - I would probably know something about authenticity. Geographically - Tver Region .
The " Techniques " I do not understand. And about eskpertnoe conclusion , I think, clear from the posts - none of that - I 'm writing about it and just ask - what are the steps in this case.
If a picture is worth roughly five thousand , then do the examination for 60 thousand , to know that this is exactly Makovsky - I absolutely do not need it, I do not judge . Just looked on the internet other paintings by this artist and this image of them found - thought that maybe it is valuable for the art .

In short , " not paid " ... and on the forum no one took >