What is encrypted Leopold Louis Robert?

[sergejnowo]

Eriksson, it is not the case with the date of the signature?

According to information on the Internet, it is not rare signed only the initials of the first type "L" + "is not quite legible signs."

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran; 2288211"

You can not even understand what kind of numbers there are written.

So maybe not philosophize slyly? (Strong lukanka something, uh, strong ...)
Given that the own signature Robert in the picture - no, but there are only a later inscription on the back of the canvas and label logical to assume the following: under this stone (in the sense - in stone sem) - Monogram actual author . Or - the date.
The presence of some Masonic symbols - is welcome, but is not determined by the nature of visual motifs, nor anything else. Yes, and then encrypt them, then? Tea, not noneshnie time ... However, it is also smacks lukankiny fun (not the night be commemorated, sgin-spilling!)
Speaking of Masonic symbols. Not far from my house miraculously survived mansion with a set of these same characters, and even two charming gargoyles on the roof. Long stood praktitski abandoned, crumbling stucco, Gargoyle - ached, lose weight and shed. (Just right was to climb to the roof itself - lapochek save while not shabby. Victory for common sense and the inherent lack of agility). When the house was restored, I was very afraid that the beauty fuck posbivayut. No, tselehonka!

Добавлено через 34 минуты
That's not a dilettante silent ...
The most important thing I do not think that painting the picture may refer to the first third of the XIX century. 1860 (based on , and then - debatable) - no problem , but certainly not the thirties. ( Do not throw at me, please , old chairs - on my horse hair allergy !)
And things at Robert - easier , faster, more refined . With ear- evoynymi characters you have to keep the eyes open , do not turn your back - one never knows sunet you feather in the ribs ! And that - as a Sunday school student on trips to New Athos Cave : clothing - stroke , head - pomaded , currently sits exactly on the priest , four-ton clear there sipping ( grappa should be).
Such " thugs" who just wrote. (That's at least have our seniors : only from Peter to come to Italy - and let the robbers perpetuate ! Because - picturesque , Rogue ...)
Excuse me , good people, if that 's not ...

[Дилетант]

That's not a dilettante silent ...
The most important thing I do not think that painting the picture may refer to the first third of the XIX century. 1860 (based on , and then - debatable) - no problem , but certainly not the thirties. ( Do not throw at me, please , old chairs - on my horse hair allergy !)
And things at Robert - easier , faster, more refined . With ear- evoynymi characters you have to keep the eyes open , do not turn your back - one never knows sunet you feather in the ribs ! And that - as a Sunday school student on trips to New Athos Cave : clothing - stroke , head - pomaded , currently sits exactly on the priest , four-ton clear there sipping ( grappa should be).
Such " thugs" who just wrote. (That's at least have our seniors : only from Peter to come to Italy - and let the robbers perpetuate ! Because - picturesque , Rogue ...)
Excuse me , good people, if that 's not ...

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Dilettante, 2288341

The most important thing I do not think that by painting this picture can refer to the first third of the XIX century.
1860 (based on, and then - debatable) - no problem, but certainly not the thirties.

Why do not you think?