Talk "for life"

[zarajara]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

But the Voronezh not pay the bank,%%and fines.

My friend commented: "Well, if it's not a fairy tale? Same bank" Tinkoff "advertising? Like, come on, we can even fool!"


Interesting point of view.

If this is so then the bank posoprotivlyatsya but pay <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Pecheneg]

In my opinion this "duck" . I'm in the contract with the telephone company to connect to the internet to get an agreement on three sheets of wet seal, and then the money and so easy to change the credit terms referring to your own website .
 There are paper documents signed by the client and the bank's stamp in duplicate ... what sites ?
I DO NOT BELIEVE !

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pecheneg; 2706381 "

There are paper documents signed by the client and the bank's stamp in duplicate ... what sites ?
I DO NOT BELIEVE !

 And there were " paper documents " with " Wet Seal ", except that the bank signed and stamped by a contract in which credited made ​​changes , and these changes proshlyapil bank .
Scanned document , changed a few lines in his favor , and sent to the bank. There is, of course , the text in small type , too, has not checked and signed the document . The contract is accepted as legitimate, because it cost stamps and signatures of both parties. When a client does not read the fine print - no one pays attention to it, but here the bank clerk had read . Formally, all OK : signature, seal it all, and besides, the document (contract ) does not contain fixes done completely legal.
 Customer brought a contract with their terms - the bank has agreed to them . By law - absolutely fine. Is not it? <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Магнолия]

Сообщение от zarajara

But I do not think that the bank will pay, yet such an organization as the bank always has precedence over the individual.

Hyperpersonality stronger personality

[zarajara]

Сообщение от Magnolia

Hyperpersonality stronger personality

I'm afraid that all the prosaic: there is not really an independent court

[Pecheneg]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Client brought a contract with its terms - the bank has agreed to them.
By law - absolutely fine.
Is not it?

Could be.
But the bank, I think, just because the money is not otdat.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Pecheneg

Maybe.
But the bank, I think, just because the money is not otdat.

Already given.
Credit for the account of the client, he will now return it without interest easily.


Well done, what to say!
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pecheneg; 2706721 "

But the bank , I think, just because the money is not otdat .

So there is , I think, very much about money no talk : the customer returned the borrowed amount , and when the bank began to claim interest and penalties , he was surprised : " What are the percentages ? Any fines? It's me you should read the small text in the contract font - everything about the percentage, and the penalty ".

[artcol]

Сообщение от Pecheneg

referring to your own website.

This is called - offer.
Inviting neogranichennmu public.

[Магнолия]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky ; 2706421 "

bank signed and stamped by a contract in which credited made ​​changes , and these changes proshlyapil bank .
Scanned document , changed a few lines in his favor , and sent to the bank. There is, of course , the text in small type , too, has not checked and signed the document . The contract is accepted as legitimate, because it cost stamps and signatures of both parties. When a client does not read the fine print - no one pays attention to it, but here the bank clerk had read . Formally, all OK : signature, seal it all, and besides, the document (contract ) does not contain fixes done completely legal.
Customer brought a contract with their terms - the bank has agreed to them . By law - absolutely everything is in order .

I'm just doing with sample contracts. And in some cases, appeal to the court " to compel to sign a contract ."

Added after 16 minutes

Сообщение от Pecheneg; 2706721 "

But the bank just because the money is not otdat .

In this realm , the state and the " simple" and " not just" does not do justice . In 1998, I won her claim from the bank though . that the bank "Russian credit " admitted the claim in full. So famous for its ..... Alfred Koch dragged through legislation a ban on the execution of judgments against the bank "Russian credit " . In both ! " Loot not pay ! "