How to promote the artist?

[Seriy]

Сообщение от spigo

Thanks, Alexander! A copy of the original, more expensive than you have given a physical assessment of the works of Malinowski, AV

so copy the style of Vasya Pupkin obtained in 10 000 times more expensive than the cost of the original, with it here - how much is original? just a tedious job, requiring specific skills, effort and time - get used to someone else's creative method.

[spigo]

Сообщение от Seriy

is tedious work

And do not say, go'll do my.

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Seriy

so copy the style Vasya Pupkin get to 10 000 times more expensive than the cost of the original, with it here - how much is original? just a tedious job, requiring specific skills, effort and time - get used to someone else's creative method.

Plius eto bylo skazano v otvet na "na slovah", teper 'my znaem, u kogo na slovah !

[LCR]

Сообщение от Seriy

all that way and no one denies. Just as I understand it, is the goal of this artist to move to a higher level, with the "sensitive artist with the exact taste, color and his face" on, say, - "bright, unique, opening new horizons."
Is this possible?

You know, I think that this artist does not need to "promote", it should just show. Objective curator - not to invent any scenarios, the legend, "Lives," etc., and to choose the right conditions for display, keeping the bar high. When it's success - is another thing: sometimes it comes too late for the artist, and the worse for the artist, but for pictures it's like.
Of course, there is still underappreciated artists - Monticelli, for example (how glad I am that Sinichka bought it myself!), Or even de Stael (in monetary terms is quite disparate things, but this is not me), but I'm sure and then things gradually get up to his place.

I know it can, I think, say, from the inside: the work of my husband, Mikhail Roginsky, no one has never had worked (now I do), no art strategies or tactics it has not been used, no legends no he did not invent, he absolutely do not hang out - and yet, now, no exhibition, no book on Russian art of the second half of the twentieth century can not afford to ignore it a name (just literally 5 minutes ago, I saw a review of the opus N. Sinelnikovo: You can complain and the fact that in extremely heavy volume, there was no place for the story of the bar Nonconformist artists. Where is the brilliant Michael Roginskii? ").

In what terms will be characterized by the artist, "sensitive" or "bright"? I am quite indifferent to the epithets of art publications, the main thing - it is a picture (it's quite funny, considering that I myself in art education), it is important that they lied to as little as possible in color, as can be reproduced more faithfully the original.

Сообщение от Seriy

As for the work will find admirers, and on the order of the worst works find its buyer.

You're right, but here the time puts everything into place: the museums are rarely seen chippie (monstrously undervalued in money for the artist, as I told you about above - Adolphe Monticelli, who adored Van Gogh, to cite only one example - was present in all more or less significant museums of painting XIX century.).

Here, perhaps, all the above somewhat muddled and not take into account the latest art-technology, but that is my understanding of the gallerist, the work very difficult.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от spigo

if you get better, then I agree with you

Where are the criteria?
From the point zrenmya What (Who) is better?

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от Seriy

And Butterflies sell above cost, without haste. Will be cheaper, more people will want to buy.
For example, I :-) Especially his rotary-image is like.

"Let's see .. What people? Hundreds neprodanyh ... 6 factories have designed ...
Most likely, another fire happens ... or something like

Сообщение от Seriy

Do not share it, was to say something new?

For me, it was. (Not yet such advanced ..)
 

Сообщение от Seriy

And as for the work will find admirers-and on the order of the worst are the purchaser of his

If you read the will to see them somehow ..

Added after 17 minutes

Сообщение от LCR

that this artist does not need to "promote", it should just show.

But I think this is long one and the same ..
Not show e-sell!
 

Сообщение от LCR

this picture ... it is important that they lie as little as possible in color, as can be reproduced more faithfully the original.

Quote:[/QUOTE]
In my opinion it is just not the most important (although, again, must check dictionaries, because all depends on estetiseskoy interprietatsii, is not it? ..)

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от LCR

You know, I think that this artist does not need to "promote", it should just show.

Vo mnogom soglasen, no pokazyvat '- eto prodvigat', eto chast 'protsessa.


Objective curator - not to invent any scenarios, the legend, "Lives," etc., and to choose the right conditions for display, keeping the bar high.

Pri takom kolichestve hudoznikov, kak segodnia, eto problematichno.


When it's success - is another thing: sometimes it comes too late for the artist, and the worse for the artist, but for pictures it's like.

Zdes' vy absoliutno pravy, no mnogim hochetsia uspeha pri zisni.


In what terms will be characterized by the artist, "sensitive" or "bright"? I am quite indifferent to the epithets of art publications, the main thing - it is a picture (it's quite funny, considering that I myself in art education), it is important that they lied to as little as possible in color, as can be reproduced more faithfully the original.

Bylo by zamechatel'no!


Here, perhaps, all the above somewhat muddled and not take into account the latest art-technology, but that is my understanding of the gallerist, the work very difficult.

Kogda my govorim investirovanie, neobhodimo uchityvat 'art tehnologii

[LCR]

Сообщение от AlexanderG

Kogda my govorim investirovanie, neobhodimo uchityvat 'art tehnologii

Heh-heh, in order to accommodate the art technology, it is necessary to know them. You present to me too much to ask

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от LCR

You are bringing me too much to ask

 Ni v koem sluchae. Ia voobsche ne trebovatel'nyi, staraius' privesti k obschemu znamenateliu sistematizatsiiu art rynka, terminologii i pr. Vizu v etom serioznoe buduschee.

Ne smotria ni na chto, k iskusstvovedam otnoshus' berezno !

[таша]

Сообщение от LCR

You know, I think that this artist does not need to "promote", it should just show. Objective curator - not to invent any scenarios, the legend, "Lives," etc., and to choose the right conditions for display, keeping the bar high.

Сообщение от LCR

I know it can, I think, say, from the inside: the work of my husband, Mikhail Roginsky, no one has never had worked (now I do), no art strategies or tactics it has not been used, no legends no he did not invent, he absolutely partying - and yet, now, no exhibition, no book on Russian art of the second half of the twentieth century can not afford to bypass its name

Absolutely agree. And how many more artists who are known not "through" and "contrary". And even more those who are very well right whirled in accordance with "art-technology" and in response, silence ... Art Market of course, to some extent similar to the simple market, but there are nuances, not amenable to analysis, paradoxes, contrary to all rules. It is ridiculous to think that those whom we now call non-conformists was a business plan. The result of (financial), we know. Unfortunately, selling art is not selling sausages .

[AlexanderG]

Сообщение от Tasha

 Unfortunately, selling art is not selling sausages .

 
Da, na sosiski spros est 'vsegda !

A iskliucheniia, lish 'podtverzdaiut pravila.