Can I include a very good painting?

[annagavr]

Сообщение от kron

Lifes Nemtseva - never hooked anything.

Still, with a discussion that began branch - certainly a lucky thing from a purely formal, technical point of view.
That, in general, most importantly, in a still life.


Another great natyurmotr in that collection - V.F.Horenko brush.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Now, too, looked at the topic again glad
shown Samvel and once again regretted Barvikha.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[annagavr]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

Technique of today are nothing new , and not even poraduesh zainteresuesh .

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

Click on your health items around - that's you and still lifes. <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

No way these two statements are not mutually dependent. Just only technique and could surprise in still life . This is exactly the genre in which materiality and illusion painting work together , complementing each other. Most formalist genre .

Let's ask him to Barvikha published Horenko still life .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от annagavr; 2923461"

Just , just technique and could surprise in still life . This is exactly the genre in which materiality and illusion painting work together , complementing each other .

Well , that's what surprises anyone .
Someone hit and tricks magicians or the ability to walk on a wire under the big top .
I also illusions techies not interesting if it is only a technique .
I feel closer to some imaginative interpretation of something. What? Well, its something many .

[Андрей Жданов]

Understanding what?
The nature of things?


There are still lifes, which look - the soul rejoices, though wrote a simple at first glance.
(Herring Petrov-Vodkin a graphic)


there is technically flawless, and coloristic rich ...
dead (Otto Vaeltl)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Andrei Zhdanov, 2923511

look - soul rejoices

Maybe you know where the person is the soul?
I ask all members of the forum about this, when they start talking about the soul, but no one I could not answer.

You do not know where you shower, Rejoicing at the sight of "herring Petrov-Vodkin"?

[annagavr]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

if it is the only technique .
I feel closer to some imaginative interpretation

This of course.

Imagery largely determines the richness of the work, and without work, it is not paradoxical in the case of realism , often becomes empty and meaningless . Exactly like the picture.

But the concept of a common plan or draft as a work of fine art , by definition, is not interesting , because he has to implement often need the same conceptual tools (ie similar , coherent) , and if it is " holstmaslo " - it is often not fertilized creative spirit a new idea, but a kind of intellectual reflection , and a priori secondary , causing removal of unnecessary questions from serious and competent people fed exclusively frivolous (or simple) context.

[Андрей Жданов]

Cyril Syzransky, the soul of man is localized in 2 places - in the stomach and in the prostate gland.
When looking at the Peter Herring worries first area

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Andrei Zhdanov, 2923581

soul men localized in 2 places - in the stomach and prostate.

And where she moved when this man do resection of the stomach and remove the prostate gland adenoma?
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Artoil-A]

Сообщение от zarajara

I've remembered . Valentin Podpomogov put in the studio fluorescent lights, you know, a vile white light , and wrote mostly in the evening and at night. Argument he had fun " paintings in the museum of this light will hang ." True, his monochrome paintings , he does not particularly hurt . http://www.podpomogov.am/Gallery.htm

It's not enough . Need a full spectral range and uniformity of illumination. Establish such coverage at least easel and palette rather kanitelno . But with modern computer technology and photos and maybe yourself.
And almost right artist , focusing on coverage of the alleged exposure.