Fakes ... Fakes ...

[xopowo]

Сообщение от Konstantin

It seems that this part of the picture . If so it's good to see the whole.

Lord,
It is interesting that you and about this Krasnopevtseva opinions hodiatsya distribution . Here's a more detailed set of photographs. This oil on wood panel, then what looks like pressed sawdust impregnated with glue - that is .
Like similar boards in his other works too.

Thank you for your answers.

[OlegTsi]

Сообщение от OlegTsi; 1713233"

But, nevertheless , to give the correct answer is true , we must look the picture in hand, to have its provenance , and show it to friends of the environment Krasnopevtseva people

Сообщение от Konstantin; 1713433"

assembled a characteristic set of objects and ... all . The quality of painting on a photo is hard to say , alive has an effect of peace and quiet . If you use the proposed scale of 0-10 is more than 5 .

Сообщение от Alec Sander ; 1713951"

You can even transfer on trifles , but so clear conclusion - falshaka

Looked closer today to a better picture and agree with the conclusions. If the track was better, then the authenticity of a photo without additional information it would be even more difficult. The fact that this picture was posted in the topic initially talked about himself . Thank you for helping diagoz put - it is a fake .

[xopowo]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

The fact that this picture was posted in the topic initially talked about himself .

Dear OlegTsi,

I do not agree with this argument . Having read all the correspondence here is my impression that vyskazyvayushiesya argumeniruyut expert opinion solely on the basis of the image.

Note the forum "real ... real ..." does not exist yet .

I hope for fairness and not on a desire to expose "because they asked the same."

How about this Burliuk ?


Thank you all speak and especially OlegTsi.

[art2008]

Burliuk in a private gallery of Warsaw.

[Konstantin]

Сообщение от xopowo; 1714081"

I got the impression that vyskazyvayushiesya argumeniruyut expert opinion solely on the basis of the image.

You are very observant. We actually voted on the basis of the image. To touch to smell, and so on. have not yet become.

Сообщение от xopowo; 1714081"

I hope for impartiality

Have you noticed a bias here? You convincingly express their "opinion", who has an objection on the merits - are welcome.

The only conclusion that you need to do if you are a buyer, that the painting should be taken very carefully. About provenance you have not told us anything, if it exists. But if not, then ...

[color="#666 686"]Posted 18 minutes[/color]

Name
Nature morte métaphysique
Year established 1980
Category Paintings
Technique Hardboard; oil
Size 64x41 cm
Provenance -
Note -
Indicator of investment risk Medium risk
auction sale
Title Nature morte métaphysique
Date 08/07/2011
The auction house Damien Leclere, Marseille
Lot 118
Estimate 5000 - 6000 EUR (7129 - 8554 USD, 4444 - 5332 GBP)
The result is not sold
Title Nature morte métaphysique
Date 18/12/2010
The auction house Damien Leclere, Marseille
Lot 292
Estimate 5000 - 6000 EUR (6594 - 7913 USD, 4245 - 5094 GBP)
The result is not sold

The picture is in our database and it is assigned a "yellow light of the investment risk" (see for yourself what it means). And if you look at the price and the fact that at this price it can not find a buyer, then the opinion of members of the forum is better to listen.

[uriart]

OlegTsi, here's one more address Elena Basner


elena.basner @ bukowskis.com

[OlegTsi]

Сообщение от xopowo; 1714081"

How about this Burliuk ?

The image of this work is familiar to me . My opinion - it is a fake and the work of the same artists, photo paintings, which I show . From the words of those who saw and " smelled " them, all work very thoroughly dry , paint is completely solid, in some places cracelures . The amount of care speaks for itself .

Mid-Hudson Auction Galleries, PO Box 305 , Cornwall-On-Hudson, NY 12 520

Estimate $ 8,000 - $ 12,000
Starting Bid $ 4,000

RUSSIAN OIL PAINTING SGD. BURLIUK

Sold For $ 4,750

Oil on canvas, winter scene, young woman carrying water buckets, surrounded by farm scene with chickens. Signed David Burliuk 17 1 /2 "x 14"

[OlegTsi]

Continuation of post number 939

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...&postcount=939


The motive for the forgery under Burliuk was taken with this watercolor.

[advokat]

Сообщение от Madam, 1712801

I am preparing a catalog of works by Shapiro and this picture I know.
She seemed genuine.

and a lot of work you have collected Shapiro?
which funds and archives preserve its documents?
find relatives?

[Алек Сандер]

Сообщение от xopowo

I do not agree with this argument . Having read all the correspondence here is my impression that vyskazyvayushiesya argumeniruyut expert opinion solely on the basis of the image.

Note the forum "real ... real ..." does not exist yet .

I hope for fairness and not on a desire to expose "because they asked the same ".

I think in this case, we must take Kras . Some 10.6 thousand euros, and Krasnopevtsev this period is actually worth in the hundreds of dollars. Play it safe ! And drink champagne . But do not say you were not warned. Do you have some sort of paranoia , right ...

The images in this case is more than enough. Do not even need to watch live . By the way, " Gelos " such Krasnopevtseva even cheaper on sale. Do not miss out ! There's even a freebie.