Simon Faibisovich, the exhibition "Evidence" on Gogol Boulevard, 10

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Tasha

About the stories: Who said what should be a pleasure? You're talking about investments, and money does not smell. Faibisovich-bright, talented representative of photorealism. From the Russian artists of the direction of one of the most powerful. And, actually does not matter (for investment) that he would submit to the court, so to speak. But for the artist is important. Paint a "nude" - get a "glamor". Paint a homeless person, no blame.

Here you are mistaken. For investments positivity of the plot is even more important. On a positive or plot-neutral now much easier to find a buyer. So the plot, along with the technique, size, period - is one of the most important investment parameters.

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от Seriy

Vladimir, as well as you are homeless?

You are about investments? Then working in minus. Circus would cost much more and would sell them more easily.

[таша]

Tjutchev, Thank you, what you remember about me. I try to participate as I can, not going to leave

Сообщение от Vladimir

I want to remind that the site and forum devoted to art criticism is not, and investment in the arts. Roughly speaking - a site about the money. Therefore, the problem of many participants - not to discover new names, and converting knowledge into money, to find variants with good growth potential price. I understand why this is happening.

Vladimir, to understand why this happens, the potential investor should run ahead of Steam locomotive, and not to drag him into the mainstream. But this is impossible without knowledge of what they do "new names" Destinations replace each other and must be able to analyze not only the summary of sales and trends. (And it is impossible to do without trying to be a little "art critic". Cheerless carnival 70's, 80's replaced by irony "Sots Art" and nonsense "conceptualism." Tired of the irony, here's a new "glamor". From glamor sick-get expression of youth subcultures. did not go? Remembering strictly adjusted, intelligent photorealism ... What's next? "Maybe fatigue fotoREALNOSTI cause interest to complete detachment from reality alogical nature of al-brut? And why not, in fact ? "To understand what will drive the next wave, we must know that matures in the cellars, and not flourishing on the surface. In the big players certainly have the capacity sinitsiirovat next" wave ", but apart from these features have a grasp of the" new ". Without it, all to no avail. heavy-not cool, damped.

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от Tjutchev

I do not understand how you can invest in art, not figuring in the subject of investing! Of course, this is possible, but it is roughly the same thing as buying shares of the company, without knowing anything about this company! Again, it happens, and so on, but all the same aerobatics - is when you strive to thoroughly understand what delaesh.Tolko in this case there are serious income and that much more valuable, enjoy the process.

Tjutchev, I agree with you.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Tasha

To understand what will drive the next wave, we must know that matures in the cellars, but not flourishing on the surface. In the big players certainly have the capacity sinitsiirovat next "wave", but apart from these features have a grasp of the "new". Without it, all to no avail. Heavy-not cool, damped.

Collector-visionary and investor - it is a little different roles. One deals with the fact that opens, oschibaetsya and again risks, "or hit or miss." That is, can make 20 errors, and then open the Basques. Or not open. But the investor is working in the system of reasonable risks. You can earn 10%or 200%. But the risk to buy very much "dummy" should be deleted.

[таша]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Collector-visionary and investor - it is a bit different Role.

Collector-visionary is often successful investor, the more that we mean not just people who buy anything like it, but a personality who can analyze. It's just another level of investment

[Konstantin]

To understand what will drive the next wave, we must know that matures in the cellars, but not flourishing on the surface.

the more that we mean not just people who buy anything like it, but a personality who can analyze.

tasha you mean modern govrite?
And then what a dialogue discussing the extreme situation? It is always better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick.

[таша]

Konstantin, about the current course.

Сообщение от Konstantin

what dialogue discussing the extreme situation? It is always better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick.

With this it is difficult not to agree

[Konstantin]

About investment in contemporary art - no art history education will not help. For any:
1) 100%risk
2) It is stretched in time.

The British actor Hugh Grant admitted that he was drunk when bought at auction a portrait of Elizabeth Taylor by Andy Warhol, reports The Daily Mail.

This random purchases made in 2001, significantly enriched the actor: six years later, Grant sold the painting for 13 million pounds, 11 million more than it spent on it. Media wrote that, having bought Warhol, Grant has proven himself a connoisseur of art, but selling now - an expert on trends in the art market.

Art criticism education has nothing to do with it.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Konstantin, British general, on all hands out of boredom, it seems ...
Tired, for example, Gordon Matthew Sumner, work as a teacher in a Catholic elementary school in St. Paul Kremligtone, moved to London and was Sting, singing songs began. Nothing, people like.
And Rod Stewart at the cemetery digging graves, tired, spit and served in a rock star ...

[Seriy]

Vladimir, blue and pink period, Picasso did neither positive nor joyous. Rather depressing, full of hunger, cold, despair, loneliness. That does not prevent him from being very expensive.
T e in general I agree with you, but you can lead and counter-examples.
Fr Bacon, too, was not positive.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Seriy

Vladimir, but as you are homeless?

Вложение 623391..............