How to deal with rudeness

[ФЕОФАН МУХИН]

Сообщение от Grigory

COP is constantly fighting off the attacks of one group forumchan.

Yes, he is 24 hours a day otbivaetsya.Vidno longer able to do nothing except to tease and fight back.
Surely man has no other cases in life than to sit Compon.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Grigory

who start most fights

Most of the problems on the forum is from Cyril Syzran.
But this topic is already tired of all talk.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

At the reception a different opinion.

Everyone has the right to express their opinion.
You konfliktuete with many participants of the forum, starting with oseni.Eta topic has been interesting.

[Grigory]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

At the reception a different opinion.

As in kindergarten!
Cyril Syzransky, Oh be quiet a bit!
And residents of Sochi silence does not hurt too!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Grigory, silent, silent, silent ... : shy:

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Grigory

Dear Tjutchev!
I got the opposite impression that COP is constantly fighting off the attacks of one group forumchan. You read carefully, and you will discover a history of conflict, and you'll see who starts ...


We also have other company. Company overactive bullies who start most of the fights.

Do not want to, but will have to give warning, alas ...

   Dear Grigory, I would have gladly agreed with you, but I myself have repeatedly been attacked by the Cyril Syzran. And these were not harmless fun, and degrading attacks on my dignity! Unfortunately, I can not give evidence, because every time you washed pearls Mr Syzran (and rightly so). As a minimum, three times he intentionally touched my religious feelings. He has repeatedly accused me without proof of incompetence, that is, that I give to non-professional advice and expressing unfounded opinions. We must pay tribute to Cyril in his ability to provoke people to aggression! Sometimes his posts may seem harmless and even persuaded to empathize, but it is only at first glance. What is worth at least his repeated statements that his face insult Jews? Why do I think it is good enough provocation. In - the first, it does not have any relationship to the Jews (because as a Jew - is the concept of religion, but religion is not compatible with immorality). Secondly, I personally have never read the forum of anti-Semitic remarks. In my opinion, it is natural that I am doing exactly that conclusion. Maybe you have another explanation? Then share it, please. No one is not screaming that the Russian beat when Cyril Syzransky Stebaev frankly, over the fact that many expensive! Why is permissible to reproach the Russian Orthodox Church and its representatives, or if you have not noticed this, too? Understand it - ham, and on the causes of aggression among many on the forum. This applies especially to newcomers, who are only in terms of communication and, therefore, somewhat more susceptible to attack "credibility." Perhaps you think the behavior of Kirill harmless and acceptable, but then let me and everyone else to act in the same spirit.
  P.S. I have a totally different picture, unlike yours. But I am ready to change your opinion if you give links to those posts, which unfairly denigrate Cyril Syzran. In turn, I give references to where, in my opinion, Cyril hurt me and that I cherish. But, unfortunately, not many are left after your completely legitimate intervention. The most egregious posts, unfortunately not survived. But they were, and I'm sure you remember them.
     
     
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...???&page=2
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...???&page=7
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...??# post113815
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...??# post308195
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...??# post358575
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...??# post330645
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...??# post113725
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=25395

    I can not understand, Grigory, why you sympathize for a man like Cyril Syzransky?! I think everything is clear ... : confused:
Sincerely Tiutchev.

[Tana]

Peeped here for a moment, and seething passions here for a couple of pages!
  sorry, I do not even read this nonsense, I do not know who-rights-someone to blame, eh better read about the auctions, reread the theme of LCR of the French artists, and there you'll see, can and everything else tired of writing nonsense, and in empty talks
  life is beautiful, why waste it on nonsense, not worth the scum of my precious time and attention
leave a jealous, bitter, angry, stupid, ugly their world, leave them alone one with Doug, they will eat other household friend , but if like their company, then do not complain, themselves have made their choice, " born to crawl can not fly, "vobschem" I flew "in other topics .

[Тютчев]

HAM, a, m.

1. In the language of the nobility: a man belonging to the lower classes and lishennyypotomu any human dignity (prezrit. dorevolyuts.). - He is there serfs in French to teach invented! This, they say, it's helpful! Hama a servant, something! Dostoevsky. 2. перен. A rude, arrogant and ill-mannered man, ready for meanness (razg. despised, Bran.). Secretaries to all the scum, all the corrupt, small people, is writing a creature, they all went in knowing, all now important. Griboyedov. [On behalf of Ham, the son of Biblical Noah cursed his father for disrespect.]

http://slovari.yandex.ru/dict/ushako.../us4113119.htm


About the typology of boorishness
There are many varieties of cads. Some "hamovedy" even try to create their own classification. Thus, according to one of them, distinguished hama gloomy, a swine-cynic, Ham enthusiastic, Ham-bug, stun hama, hama bitchiness, etc. However, all Hamam characterized some typical characteristics that allow us to easily identify them. What are they?
Much about the man says his speech (sorry for the involuntary pun). So, it is replete with hama boastful remarks, he seemed to be constantly challenging others: God forbid, someone will be taped instead. In speech manifested his insolence and arrogance. He disdainfully talks about his alleged "rival". Remember Shukshin Gleb Kapustin: "- Well, let poprovedaem candidates - Hleb said modestly." "- In what field of candidates? - Gleb asked. "The candidates are now more than nerezanyh dogs ..." In a conversation ham often uses indecent expressions, flat jokes, familiarity, appeal to "you": "Sit down, Mademoiselle! Zhe Wu at a la three-montran! And you, gentlemen, slide ... nothing here! ". Mister Belebuhin, come out to the pigs dog! What snout wrinkled? "I say, come out, therefore, and come out! Vividly with me, but then, look, not even-tempered hour, as if the neck is not reprimanded!
To conduct hama typical denial of social norms, he despises them, considers himself above them. At the same time, he can defiantly hold forth about "human rights", which you allegedly violated, the honor and dignity. Himself, these concepts are alien: "- And I do not care what you - Zhestyakov! A newspaper that's what your honor ..." Ham, selfish, and therefore "protected" are actually only his "honor." Behavior hama pointedly, it is important and all of its character demonstrates this. Hearing about the new "rival" boor excited, impatient, eager to get into a fight.


http://www.trudprava.ru/index.php?id=1451

[gorelov]

As I remember, someone Ham in the form of a sharp rebuke vices father, or rather one vice - drunkenness and that is what angered God. That is, cads - are very complex characters, very. By the way, for drunkenness in November that God did not punish, and punish it for Hama world's first installation.

[gans]

Сообщение от gorelov

As I recall, someone Ham in the form of a sharp rebuke vices father, or rather a vice - drunkenness and that is what angered God

Ham mocked his father's nakedness, sleep (even after the wine) for it was punished, but for drunkenness in November speech and was not close.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 56 seconds[/color]

Сообщение от gorelov

punished for Hama is the world's first installation.

What's that do not understand?: Eek: