Artist Ixygon

[Peter]

Сообщение от artcol

Well, that's how things are. Historically. A holy place does not happen in a vacuum. Someone will take it .

Historical moment.Imenno this time humanity is characterized by new discoveries in science and technology , ideas, updates, progress in all spheres hovering in the minds of writers, poets, intellectuals and revolutionaries. The Impressionists (gently) and Post- blown classical painting . "New" was a fetish, now and then there were pockets of expressionism, fauvism, Russian avant-garde . Picasso apparently was captured by the idea that only " something extraordinary " can be sold at a period.I pravdoy.On was able to surprise , others did not have time .. But society as a whole was ready to be charmed .. "I delude myself happy ..." >

[artcol]

Сообщение от Peter

Historical moment.Imenno this time humanity is characterized by new discoveries in science and technology , ideas, updates, progress in all marzes hovered in the minds of writers, poets, intellectuals and revolutionaries. The Impressionists (gently) and Post- blown classical painting . "New" has become a fetish , there is Here, there arose centers expressionism, fauvism, Russian avant-garde . Picasso apparently was captured by the idea that only " something extraordinary " can be sold at a period.I pravdoy.On was able to surprise , others did not have time .. But society as a whole was ready to be charmed .. "I delude myself happy ..." >

Well , yes. Modern . But Wait do not understand that the court : whether the postmodern , or crisis , or spring ... Wealth of choice , in short. And a lot of leverage , but we need to turn the pivot point . Without it, no way.

Added after 1 minutes 29 minutes
My answer here:
look - the largest on the memory size of the picture , for the second , I sent - 105h160 see Plus package. The main thing is that the picture slipped into the cargo hold - have already written about it many times.
Insure up to 300 pictures can be t.rubley . But for that you need to have docs proving value. By courier insurance is easier than in the post. Courier can not ask anything about the documents.

[Seriy]

Peter, yes, you are right, people are looking for a new , even if they did not understand and did not close. As Shchukin , frowned , but bought, about the principle , then get used to it . But when he lost his money in the revolution, at a meeting with Matisse in Nice, he crossed to the other side of the street game is over.
Indicative cubism , while there was color, it is nothing, for when the analytical gray- cloth from the track can not be distinguished , on a gray background gray corners , then or now take it emotionally impossible. But it was really strange , powerful, requiring high skill composition .

[artcol]

Сообщение от Seriy

Peter, yes, you 're right -people were looking for a new , even if they did not understand and did not close. As Shchukin , frowned , but bought, about the principle , then get used to it . But when he lost his money in the revolution, at a meeting with Matisse in Nice, he crossed to the other side of the street games finished .

Or maybe it is not so? I highly doubt that's precisely this motivation Shchukin.

Here, for example , Japanese or Chinese (suspended) I do not understand - I do not buy it. Mentally, it is alien to me .

[Seriy]

and that therefore there was no technology? Were artists, was a system of regular exhibitions were galleries, critics, press , auctions were. T e a fully functional powerful market. Dinner in a cheap restaurant in Paris in the early 20th century, one franc was worth less . Figure artist untitled -50 francs , the picture without a known name to hundreds francs. For example , Matisse sold for 500. If we take the price of lunch at the Christmas parties , Sticks of 500 dpi , the figure is 25 thousand rubles , the picture is 250 thousand rubles. This is serious for an unknown artist. Known cost hundreds of thousands of francs , for example, Mille - like 300 thousand, type 5 million dollars ?
T e is a strong market, and there was something to fight for and promote.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Seriy

, and that means there was no technology? Were artists, was a system of regular exhibitions were galleries, critics, press , auctions were. T e a fully functional powerful market. Dinner in a cheap restaurant in Paris in the early 20th century, one franc was worth less . Figure artist untitled -50 francs , the picture without a known name to hundreds francs. For example , Matisse sold for 500. If we take the price of lunch at the Christmas parties , Sticks of 500 dpi , the figure is 25 thousand rubles , the picture is 250 thousand rubles. This is serious for an unknown artist. Known cost hundreds of thousands of francs , for example, Mille - like 300 thousand, type 5 million dollars ?
T e is a strong market, and there was something to fight for and promote .

Strictly speaking - no . If this is so important - I can put IMHO .

[Peter]

Сообщение от Seriy

, and that means there was no technology? Were artists, was a system of regular exhibitions were galleries, critics, press , auctions were.

Here, I would support Sergeya.Tehnologii were ( for them with some bitterness mentioned and Pissarro and Gauguin, .. I will not quote , and things there .) There prices ( ESA but unofficial ) for favorable articles in the press, a dinner party with the right people show up to the profitable by hanging space inside ... etc etc. .. Vollard good use of all the possibilities.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Peter

Here I would support Sergeya.Tehnologii were ( for them with some bitterness mentioned and Pissarro and Gauguin, .. I will not cite , and things there .) There prices ( ESA but informal ) to benevolent newspaper articles, a dinner party with the right people show up to the profitable by hanging space inside ... etc etc. .. Vollard good use of all these features .

Good, good ))
We're just in a different meaning is the word we use .

So I will be permitted to ask a question: Is there any technology promotion of the artist? Example with Rothko and Richter as BE said that did so , there is. AI 's administration even conducts workshops . But I doubted : in my opinion - not the technology itself . Too specific object promotion .

[Peter]

Сообщение от artcol

Well, well))

.
But I doubted: in my opinion - not the technology itself.
Too specific object promotion.

May be too specific technologies for each object (still the subject)?
>

[artcol]

Сообщение от Peter

May be too specific technologies for each object (still the subject) ? >

Then it's not the technology , and art, individual skills , etc. Technologies require standardization , removing subjectivity and so on.
We take such and such such and such an abstract painter , the following actions on the well-known algorithm, and the output is the result. Guaranteed .

And if the technology to invent for each artist ... Well it should be tested ... parameterization ... optimization, etc. ... Well, in general , it is clear , I think, why not ...

Therefore this and interested in doing . Actually , the same creativity.