What are the critics?

[таша]

NATA NOVA, Some do not understand what it means to "clean the subconscious." No deviations? If you aspire to the purity of spirit, the arts are contraindicated, because art=temptation to get even with God, pride, I'm a Creator. As God created man, who then lived in itself, so the artist creates a work that often live on their own laws, not always provided by the artist. A writer begins to write, say, a novel, but suddenly it turns out that the text says himself, that is acquires the properties of "living". Art-torment, sometimes fear and trembling from the discovery of what you do not want to know the temptation to look into the abyss, or even take a step. But at the same time and the desire to know the rest as the supreme measure of purity of spirit. Such is the ambivalence of feelings. But it is not necessarily a recipe

 There are artists who are on one of the poles and really dostigayushih "purity" without any deviations. Purity, bordering on the icon. Sterligov example.

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

According to your logic, the purer the subconscious, the lower the level of creativity?

It is not I said

Сообщение от Art-lover

artists - such loonies that an analysis of the depths of the subconscious is not shown. Because they are commanded: "Love your Syndrome".))

[NATA NOVA]

Natasha,

Сообщение от Tasha

If you aspire to the purity of spirit, the arts are contraindicated,

Natasha, your position is understandable. (But on the "craft" as contraindications. I hope not apply?)

Сообщение от "Tasha, 1138891

for art = temptation to stand on a level with God, pride, I'm a Creator.

Natasha, but this largely depends on the "personal relationship with God" ..
If God-friend, comrade and brother, then why not create a "creative union, cooperative, corporation?
Of course, many things, God Creation "is not always clear," and (judging by the Scriptures) behaves sometimes "not as I would like ...
But who among us is not without izyana?
Tasha Oh, if you do not operate on the notion of "art" (and replaced by "craft") is much freer can breathe.
 (And let the religions, if possible, is not binding)

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Art-lover

And still more, a good critic - the fantasy of the artist.) After all the properties of criticism, the kind Sokurov, cause idiosyncrasy in Pavel'a. And vice versa.
And so the critic who just should not be, because it is a psychoanalyst: artists - such loonies who analyzes depths of the subconscious is not shown. For he commanded: "Love your syndrome".))
Psihokritik uncover the depth where the roots of drag artist - and all that'll be done. The roots will shrink, the audience will pozezvyvat and ozdorovevshy mentally bankrupt artist.)
So, if the "alter ego" of the criticism had not worked better for him to go to iskusstvovody. Or, at worst, in the art. )

This word, which you pitched me, I return unopened. I always thought the literature, that if it is not clear, it is not cool. Is expressed understandable please.
The critic in my understanding, this is not the person criticizing the work of the artist in the studio. The critic is the analyst. Analyzing the work of artists he summarizes his findings and lays out all on shelves.
on trends, defines the direction and the group style features and leading artists.
Sokurov is not my authority and working in another field and general director, who today praise and do not want to know tomorrow.
I proceed from the experience of pictorial art. Who could say how Matisse? He was kicked out of the studio considering that he was a bad draws, he studied with Van Gogh obscure and despised by all Cezanne. He was found just after the Second World War. Sneezing he wanted it, went his own way. IT. e.

[Самвел]

Сообщение от "Tasha, 1138701

I speak for myself: No criticism, exposing lapses can not change my creativity, my mistakes, I see myself always, and if you do not see, no one can convince me that they have

Criticism is not for you, and for the public. which is interested in this or any other material. Artists are very vulnerable, and is unaware of his blunders, and even love them.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Samvel

Criticism is not for you, and for the public. which is interested in one way or another material. Artists are very vulnerable and do not notice their failures, and even love with them.

And sometimes what everyone thinks blunders is originality, so what distinguishes the artist from all the other artists.

[Самвел]

Сообщение от Pavel

And sometimes what everyone thinks blunders becomes originality,

Criticism slightly broader than simply the product of the author, it can not touch the material, and personality of the artist, his behavior, statements about samodovolste, or vice versa. After all, someone would not say, but the artist's personality is kolosalnoe value is not necessarily something that would have been good quality. One word. I do not know what my character, but he has it exactly.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Samvel

Criticism slightly broader than simply the product of the author, it can not touch the material, and personality of the artist, his behavior, statements about samodovolste, or vice versa. After all, someone would not say, but the artist's personality has kolosalnoe value is not necessarily something that would have been good quality. One word. I do not know what my character, but he has it exactly.

The identity of the artist begins to wonder if huzhozhnik succeeds. It is now with the advent of television and media can create an artist known for the money, which the artist is usually not enough, so everybody understands that involved foreign forces are full of purpose. This is intended primarily to impress buyers, but in the absence of talent from the artist is a fraud. One way otema money. The main opposition is public opinion. It is unmistakable.
So what personal qualities affect only your own creativity.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

The main opposition is public opinion. It's unmistakable.

Here's another ready for The banner slogan.
But it's not for the artist's studio.

Added after 7 minutes

Сообщение от Pavel

This is intended primarily to impress buyers, but in the absence of talent from the artist is a fraud.

Talent-term very efimernoe. At a forum on this a hundred times. "
AlexanderG even asked the question: "Can you measure talent?"
But the fact that you, Pavel, call it "fraud", many call "the formation of demand."

[Самвел]

Сообщение от Pavel

The main opposition is public opinion.

Here I beg to differ, because the public interested in earthly things, obestvennym opinion I think can be ignored. As you heard half an ear, the TV in my opinion. As for the holiday crowd, not necessarily freedom. I do not know if right here, but the mud and it does not.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Samvel, and public opinion is formed as well as demand.