A. Schilder original or not and the cost

[Игорь Гурьев]

In Schilder nothing in common.
He has always crushed and the outgoing interior space, and here all at the viewer.

It is a linear-planar arrangement, closer to, say, Alexander Kravchenko, than to the old style and primitive realist Schilder.

And the craftsmanship it does not reach.

In my opinion, this is a lottery.

[Игорь Гурьев]

You have convinced yourself that it Schilder.

But I'm not sure that you convince others, Comrade lazycat.

Right "list Schilder" is.

More precisely, the list of cons Schilder "more for the list.

[luka77]

Сообщение от lazycat

Bring me to Barvikha

lazycat,

And that in Barvikha? Your gallery?

[lazycat]

Сообщение от luka77

And that in Barvikha? Your gallery?

Yes, the gallery.

[Тютчев]

lazycat, you have the money? You are good at painting? This is very good! Just do not be so nervous. If I understand you correctly, you are ready to lay out money for this work without any conditions? If so, it is worthy of respect! If only because that is a position backed by deeds. I think that there are no obstacles to the implementation of the transaction. So, this picture is very soon to be yours. I have to ask you, could you inform us about the future of this work. Of course, within certain limits. Personally, I am interested in the details relating to the attribution of this work. I would be grateful if you will keep us informed.

I'm not being ironic. I'm really interested. A discussion. On the picture there were different views, including yours. It is possible that you have the experience, which allows you to assert that it is the work of Schilder (the more so because you think no one). It is possible that I do not have enough experience to recognize what is undoubtedly for you. I quite admit the possibility of their mistakes. I think you and sensibly evaluate their capabilities. Wrong and did not like you and me! Mistaken all those that it does! This is normal! We are just people! This is normal, only occurring in the virtual.

Personally, I am on the forum, apart from anything else, in order to obtain information from those who possess it and is ready to share. It's a way of self through the exchange of experience and constant monitoring of their own knowledge. I was really fascinated.

So, soon the picture will be you. You see it, smell, feel and etc ... You are either completely sure they are right or acknowledge my point of view. In any case, once again I ask you, keep us informed. Otherwise, why all this was necessary? I look forward to ...
 
P.S. No excuses are not accepted. "In for a penny, in for a pound!" (Folklore)

[lazycat]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

P.S. No excuses are not accepted. "In for a penny, in for a pound!" (Folklore)

If this work did you reach me, then, do not worry, you are about it will never hear. That way, I think good for painting.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от lazycat

If this job did you reach me, then, do not worry, you are about it will never hear. That way, I think good for painting.

But why would you participate in the discussion? You could just buy this image by writing to its owner in l /sec. What motivates you? Maybe you care about "good for painting"? But what is it, good for painting? What is it? Explain, please.

And another clarification question, "good for the painting" is if the work will not hear it I or nobody else?

[Messer]

People just do not quarrel! Инфу that I needed to get, I have received, thanks! The problem is that I am not in Russia ((live show can not.

And show how close the subject. And then I did not find such a function.

[SergeiSK]

I do not know this Schilder normal or not, to me, as experts, but I can say that lazycat normal and real person, fully competent and solvent.

[Сима]

Messer, I think, to close the topic can only admins probably will hear your appeal. And you only have to close the comp .