Ukrainian artist Ivan Marchuk - one of hundreds of geniuses of our time

[gans]

Сообщение от Veronic

Why? Can you substantiate?

I really think that Ivan Marchuk in his work is at the salon (not to say the gift) art. In my opinion it is even seen on the photos submitted here. Of course, in any case, it is a personal opinion.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Veronic

Dear forum members, there is someone who agrees with gans?

"Ukrainian artist Ivan Marchuk - one of hundreds of geniuses of our time" is clearly overvalued.
Marchuk is a good, professional artist (in the Ukraine, hundreds of these).

[gans]

Сообщение от Eugene

Marchuk, a good, professional artist

I think this sounds like a death sentence. The fact of the matter is to claim a place in art, not enough to be a "good professional", must possess some "nastoyaschestyu. Of course this is subjective, but there's one judge in a measure of development in the arts.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Veronic

Dear forum members, there is someone who agrees with gans?

I neytralen.Videl his great album, watched live. I was not his work vozbuzhdaet.Na wall does not hang, and will not sell, too. And the fact that he entered the list of geniuses seems subjective. Vaughn and premium Kandinsky gave someone falling.

[Феликс]

Сообщение от gans

I really think that Ivan Marchuk in his work is at the salon (not to say the gift) art. In my opinion it is even seen on the photos submitted here. Of course, in any case, it's a personal opinion.

Recently, Marchuk, indeed, is entirely in the "salon". The professional and artistic level, not far from the baseboard. But in relation to him all the tales in the Forum does not quite fit. As the Zen Buddhists say: "Not really, not that." He did remain in the history of Ukrainian art. His work was not will drop. On the theme Marchuk will defend theses and dissertations.
For me personally, Marchuk is past. That is the charm, which appeared in the late 50's and disappeared in the early 90's. This is the drive, buyout was in the mid 60's and late 80's. Now it is not.
And at the peak of popularity in recent years, Yushchenko has nothing to do with it. I think he does not even bought any of Marchuk. Something gave him, of course. Has influenced, I think, Vladimir Shulga. Once affected Didkovskii Igor and Igor Likhovy.
As to the museum and the rating I have already spoken.

[Артюх Игорь]

Сообщение от gans

I really think that Ivan Marchuk in his work is at the salon (not to say the gift) art.

as they say unnecessary comments

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от Felix

For me personally, Marchuk is past. That is the charm, which appeared in the late 50's

And you remember Marchuk late 50's? Or drive his 60's ?........................

[Феликс]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

Do you remember Marchuk late 50's? Or drive his 60's ?........................

50's, probably not. 60's - yes, but then we did not coincide in space. I talked about the context. The real trump card this time, still under the cloth. "Forum" is not a format for for those rates. Although, I can draw from the deck, for comparison, one real trump card of the circle Ivan Ostafiychuk.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Felix

Although, I can draw from the deck, for comparison, one real trump card of the circle Ivan Ostafiychuk.

  And do not get me more?

[Феликс]

Сообщение от SAH

And do not get me more?

Unlike Marchuk, Ostafiychuk had in the late 60's - 70's total impact on the development of the western Ukrainian art and the entire Ukrainian schedule. In the late 80's went to Canada, returned after 10 years, but the situation in Ukraine is not hit. That's the whole story.