Artist Ixygon

[I-V]

Сообщение от Seriy; 2326721"

And which of the three you like best ?

Honestly - the second. Once the mouse itself to it lasts, I did so many times with great love to see (and will see) . Love the rounded objects ( onion , lemon , a plate , a glass ) in a harmonious roll , green leaf lettuce beautifully with the warm tones ...
In general, a charming still life. Point , taken from the top I also really liked - it would provide maximum beat countertop on it all perfectly situated colors work great.

Incidentally, I recall looking at a still life, like you wrote this morning bulbs - I see nothing nothing passed. The bulb is good and very out of place - the whole picture is full of warm, " onion " glow

[Seriy]

Yes, without a salad would not have happened, I realized that during the first still life, Serebryakov absolutely right, very faint green unaccented all softens. And on the first still life was also clear that the lemon does not lie in the orange-ocher range, the gamma-gray-olive. T e Serebryakov right again, depicting something resembling the color of an orange.
Still life in the second lot of time was spent on such simple things as onions and a glass. In Luke I needed a smear krapplaka, and it ended, rather, I took the whole krapplak and left in Kiev, had to invent a similar tone, but he did not lay down, tortured, probably an hour just with a bow, a simple thing after ten minutes. Nip is also not fit, wash, wrote in a new one. Therefore, the herring have any strength left, she went to a schematic, with openings underpainting ocher. Salad I wrote first, because he quickly sluggish.
In the second still life has been drunks on Facebook, te people like it. For me, it is too beautiful, built, front what-if ... Visible work, but I like it when work is not visible, EM-namazyukano namazyukano and something lurks.

[I-V]

Сообщение от Seriy; 2326761"

visible work, and I like to work is not seen

Well, I would not say that it is the work so much in him a " get out" . Yes, he looks very thoughtful , but it is of little importance. Yes , it is beautiful , but again, not too much, but in moderation. Of course, there is no limit to perfection , but for now this is definitely still life luck , not surprisingly, are the responses .

Сообщение от Seriy; 2326761"

dress something there ...

There is such as that terrible? In Cezanne, by the way, even a lot of still lifes with an emphasis - a beautiful and grand . But, most importantly , they 're not corny . So that 's all right.

Сообщение от Seriy; 2326761"

and I like to work is not visible , EM - namazyukano namazyukano , but something lurks .

Oh yes! It's always incredibly attractive. But that requires a "genius temperament " , which is not given to everyone. Even Van Gogh, in spite of its efficiency and rhythm may not fully possessed it. He does not have much of these things, although mazyukal and he heartily. But it was to " were showing something" from " namazyukannogo " such things he almost seems to be no . This is probably the gift (and very rare).

[Seriy]

Continued still lifes, which contain onions.

1.Tri bulbs, 30x40, oil on canvas

2.
Still Life with a baguette and a bottle.
50x50, oil on canvas
Lifted slightly at an angle, so that the canvas is wet and right ottsvechivaet.

[I-V]

Сообщение от Seriy; 2333661 "

Continued still life, in which there is a bow .

Seriy, as always, very good. interesting. "Three bulbs ", in my opinion, the more successful the second Still Life . But it seems that you have to write more smoothly ? Fakturistost eroding, and it you have, in my opinion, one of the strengths of the parties , it would just develop ( IMHO, as they say) .

Somewhat unusual watch you predominance of warm colors. But it is very curious ... I wonder what would happen, how things go .

Сообщение от Seriy; 2326761"

Serebryakov's absolutely right , very quiet unaccented green softens all

 
Yes, I see here - feathers bottom right. bulbs. Serebryakov's absolutely right , of course. By the way, something I can not find - in the subject used to be a more detailed discussion of its method?

[Seriy]

I-V, thanks a lot. No, it was somewhere about Serebryakov discuss that subject, showed a very competent and intelligent her life with a herring, I promised to return to Moscow and still life to write the same things, that Serebryakova, EM is not a copy, and the idea. In principle, baguette, knife, egg (white), drape and a shot is a set of Cezanne, EM I put things, but his writing.
Yes, I have not written smoothly, so tried.
The second still life seems strong, there has developed an interesting honey-pearl color, complex tone (for example dark drapery), the first time I wrote a warm shade, te light shade is cold and deep heat and this game is a warm-cold going around the still life. I still did not manage to write so well, she drapes palpably thin fluid. And the brush is not always smooth heel-written large stiff brush and vertical stripes is from the brush. This combination of different brushes and have three bulbs, and from there I moved this technique. For me, such a complex work in color and brushstroke technique-achievement.
 And like a spectator? it is always the other side of the coin. Here is a man who has long been watching what I was doing, wrote in a review on this work on Artnau:

"Sergei, I look for a long time, your talent, excellent technique,
a good sense of color and energy, etc. I can not understand why
You are wasting their potential in still life, particularly with herring
and even write it in several instances .... "


I'll sometimes look at their work in 2009, there are so many interesting ideas, and the ideas I'm going to the hardware. I do not know ... Here are today on display at the Tretyakov Suprematists of Liechtenstein Foundation saw a portrait of Malevich's mother-medium artist, if he spent his time on the classical picture, we used it and did not know, and he began to write the black squares.
Complex is the question ...
Further from realistic still lifes will rest-Popish little Suprematism, and then processing ends quietly ...

[I-V]

\\\\

Сообщение от Seriy; 2334281"

in another topic, showed a very competent and intelligent her life with a herring, I promised to return to Moscow and write a still life with the same subjects that Serebryakova, EM is not a copy, and the idea.

Yeah, I realized

Сообщение от Seriy; 2334281"

The second still life seems strong, there has developed an interesting honey-pearl color, complex tones (eg for dark drapes), the first time I wrote a warm shade, te light shadow cold and warm and deep this game in the warm-cold is all still life.

I will scrutinize

Сообщение от Seriy; 2334281"

I still did not manage to write so well-drape it palpably thin fluid

Yes, I see

Сообщение от Seriy; 2334281"

and not always smooth hand-written large backdrop stiff brush and vertical stripes is from the brush. This combination of different brushes and have three bulbs, and from there I moved this technique

In "Three bulbs' heel is just great!

Сообщение от Seriy; 2334281"

I can not understand why
You are wasting their potential in still life, particularly with herring
and even write it in several instances .... "

Sorry, but surprisingly even read it. Here, by the way, after the exhibition USDA 80 in CHA came to me the belief that trouble our artists is that they obviously do not realize that the means of expression in painting is much more important story. It would seem so much talk about it, but all the same mistakes. Yes, the simple herring with onions sing in the right hands! But, apparently, feel the joy of communicating with her painting is something sordid or what? There are no words ...

I, for instance, just know that you are happy to write all three still life. They are so lively and interesting. What else, then you need to? (Well of course technology, but in this context it is not so important).
Incidentally, after the same exhibition was clear to me that the "MOSH LOSHa lagging well behind." The situation, to say the least deplorable. Painting in Moscow, you can say no, but if it occurs, is an exception to the rule.
In St. Petersburg, it's different. But why? Riddle ..

Сообщение от Seriy; 2334281"

I'll sometimes look at their work in 2009, there are so many interesting ideas, and the ideas I'm going into the technique.

Again, simple is harder. Which is easier to sky, water, earth (visually, so to speak), and how they might? Withdrawal from the ideas in technology, positive (if its improvement through the study of nature, nature). Did not win Cezanne, as an artist, when away from their "fantasy"? Of course, it was a period of "lag" when "fantasy" came to naught, and the technique has not yet developed. Do not be surprised that he was advised to return to the "orgies", "murder", etc. And he certainly doubted. But technology was moving forward, and that he was Cezanne. There was freedom in the means of expression and all the "ideas" are simply not needed, redundant.

Сообщение от Seriy; 2334281"

saw the portrait of the mother of Malevich-medium artist, if he spent his time on the classical picture, we used it and did not know, and he began to write the black squares.

Well, it does not square with the bay was floundering writing, it is gradually going to Suprematism. It was a gradual understanding of the world through art. All this fits in its evolution.

Is onion, herring, etc. not fit into your evolution? >
You can give them up? And if they lead to something their own way, completely new? They will lead to new forms, who knows? You can not not go all the way, step by step. Not in this van gogovski >

[Fed]

Сообщение от IV; 2334441"

technology was moving forward, and that he was Cézanne.

I am very skeptical about the work of Cezanne (and not just me). So I was surprised frequent mention of his artists. Recently, watching a pack of his "masterpieces" (compared to the really interesting - with his own friend Pissarro, for example), and a breath of something very familiar and common here, and had the thought that perhaps it serves as a visual aid in the schools, so artists consider it worth the frequent mention.

Decided interest in the phenomenon of small audiences and artists of many conversations to clarify the theoretical work. Much easier, quickly found a justification - excellent in its kratosti and accuracy:
"In the history of art is the fruitfulness of attempts to create a new Cezanne great style, not the style of Cezanne as an artistic canon, was his glory."

The explanation why artists often refer to:
"Anyone can catch up on some of the works of Cezanne's what he wants, and not what is dictated earlier artistic canon. That is why the work of Cezanne's still a kind of "art closet" for contemporary artists. "

[Seriy]

IV, a word about all the steps perfectly sound, but there is one thing ...
transience of human life - it may not be enough for all step Counters.

Anywhere I did not go from not smooth, it is not just in the head, and in his hands, as grit ...

Today's sketch, paper, oil, 30x40, two turnips in the morning.

[Seriy]

Fed, is very difficult to treat Cezanne objectively , especially in Russia , it seems to come in the flesh and blood artists. Can be found attractive that will not have to travel , do not have to think , is possible for life to write apple , knife, glass and drapery or the same hill on the outskirts .