Single feature ranking

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

But seriously, you do not look at the methodology and the result

Bravo !!!!!

[kazerov]

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

Paul and Kazerovu, and all such - in the future. I came here not get worn out and did not quarrel, and respond to specific design issues of interest to all visitors of the forum.

expressed my opinion ... I have a question for you. assist you in advertising, in the above errors have no interest.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от kazerov

Paul and Kazerovu, and all such - in the future. I came here not get worn out and did not quarrel, and respond to specific design issues of interest to all visitors of the forum

expressed my opinion ... I have a question for you. assist you in advertising, in the above errors have no interest.

It should be clarified to assist in advertising your scam.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

to answer specific design questions,

Where to see your rankings on the Internet?
I remember, I was yours, it seems, the first issue, and now wants to see the latest.
Give ssylochku, please.

[inega]

In fact of the matter is that the internet offers only a list ("roster"), the authors .. But the rating categories are hidden under the gold-embossed paper-pulp edition! (If not right, correct).
And what surprises me the age limit, tied to the artists.

12. In order to streamline the current rating categories (working and living) artists identified the following conditional age restrictions:

- Rating level 1 contemporary artists can not be assigned;

- Level 2 rating can not be assigned to artists, whose age does not exceed 60 years;

- Rating level 3 can not be assigned to artists, whose age does not exceed 55 years;

- Rating the level of 4 can not be assigned to the artists whose age does not exceed 45 years;

- Rating the level of 5 can not be assigned to the artists, whose age not more than 34 years;

- Rating the level of 6 can not be given to artists whose age does not exceed 22 years.

Within the specified age limit age of the artist taken into account for ratings of, but can not be self-sufficient reason for raising or lowering the rating. In exceptional cases, the Rating center may deviate from the specified age limit. "

How would you not try to above do not jump! "Well, judging by it, I urgently need to" lower "!

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от "inega

Well, judging by it, I urgently need to" lower "

Okay, okay, you still look great!

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от DSF

Vaja Olga Ozolina, of course, anyone can register and publish any media lists and ratings. All legal.

May be legitimate, but not correct in relation to so many artists.
The motivation of this division by A and not professional. A small group of people took to divide thousands of artists on the "spiritual" and "commercial". Such a division never had. More and certificates are issued about this. This is a game with some expressions of persistence in the artistic life. There are genres, always a former commercial: landscape, still life, portrait ... But here is "opportunistic" - is among the artists understood as a negative, but in this ranking thousands of artists and genre painter marked this way. They are de only focus on market conditions. And those "spiritual" and sold some do not want. And actually ....

Posted 18 minutes

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

specific names may be? Preferably those with whose transfer or just rated you do not agree.

Do you somehow hope Leger received a rating 4B, both focused on the "market" climate. There, we see no one is known for her biography ... Van Gogh on your criteria to "notag" as much opportunistic - painted flowers and wanted to sell them to ordinary citizens ... Advertising technologies are viewed easily: next to the famous names who have not need to assess the success, written in modern names, it is known in the West reception. Write about it, for example, Falk, just about Picasso: one promoted by the artist to mention next to the Picasso created a new magazine ... Do not see the resemblance?

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от K-Maler

The motivation of this division by A and not professional. A small group of people took to divide thousands of artists on the "spiritual" and "commercial". Such a division never had.
...
Do you somehow hope Leger poluchla rating 4B, both focused on the "market" climate. There, we see no one is known for her biography ...
...
Write about it, for example, Falk, just about Picasso: that no one promoted by the artist to mention next to the Picasso created a new magazine ... Do not see the resemblance?

1) If you do not notice this division as an example at least Shilov and Kabakov, when you look at where the public opinion divides into two (I already wrote about it), then nothing can help

2) Hope Leger at us in 4A, we are well known for her biography

3) A hint about this late age of 10, because we did not start from the western masters and not our classics, but most that is most contemporary artists. Go to the library (RSL Istorichku, "Art") and take a look 1 st edition. There have generally been either living or dead is not more than 25 years ago. And no one near it was to promote "their", which the more so as there was, and is not

[DSF]

Сообщение от K-Maler

might be legitimate, but not correct in relation to so many artists.
The motivation of this division by A and not professional. A small group of people took to divide thousands of artists on the "spiritual" and "commercial". Such a division never had.

I agree with you, K-Maler. But personally I do not care about these tsifirki. They want to put them, even put it up to them. But really just competently make a list of authors it would be possible for so many years? I now have 5 edition. I liken it to the present. For the nine names, which I looked, the difference between these editions is no. And I understand why.

Сообщение от inega

And what surprises me the age limit, tied to the artists.

I'll tell you why it was done. This is a necessary measure, without it - anywhere. The fact that 4 /5, if not more, of the nearly 50,000 names of the compilers do not know and nobody review and evaluate their work will not. For it must be strongly "koryachitsya", pardon the expression. Therefore, we take the list with dates of birth, see: Artist H - 60 years on the bases does not pass, who is? Unknown. Put 4B - do not make a mistake. Artist K - 30 years on the bases - no, put 6B. And then - on the list. If suddenly the Gelos Sovkome or slip a new name, she entered into the rating. That's all the work. Therefore, the main problem with this rating in my opinion - the quality of the material.

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от dedulya37

Where to see your rankings on the Internet? I remember, I was yours, it seems, the first issue, and now wants to see the latest. Give ssylochku, please.

I can not give a link because there is no EXP to the web. We had very bad experiences on this subject when we have posted an archived version (5 th, it seems, issue) to the site and then just a month EXP under a different name and without reference to us appeared to us in an unfamiliar site <! - ~ 2 ~ - "Of course, Zagraevsky solved this problem, but we lost a lot of nerves. And there was a leak but it was able to trace all the way to the Internet

And therefore appeared on our website so loud phrase:
http://rating.artunion.ru/index.htm

WARNING!
Neither official nor unofficial online version of the handbook "One feature ranking" does not exist. Any rating category of artists that are listed online, are valid only in the presence of references to printed editions of the directory. Do not let the traffickers from the art fooled, use only the official printed edition of the handbook!

Not a good life

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от inega

And what surprises me the age limit, tied to the artists.
...
 Well, judging by it, I urgently need to "lower"!

"The age requirement" is also not good from life. It is inscribed in the regulations was the year that way at the 7 th of the rating (which is why everything that is said about the fact that we reytinguem age and someone automatically give some categories - total nonsense).

A refinement of it, because it is easier to beat off the continuous calls "misunderstood geniuses" and their very, very often high patrons. And with these qualifications, "we can say" Sorry, dear Ivan Ivanovich, but your favorite artist X does not go into such a category of age, and this is clearly a high chief: "standard, you know"