Mikhalkov vs Art

[luka77]

Сообщение от Buscador

If it is called the reception, you tend to it all the directors. Fewer problems (no one falls out of the frame, do not need to razzhovyvat, etc.) and more impact. And you listed directors are not pioneers in this - is a worldwide practice - for the best actors are always a struggle ...

But we struggle as such, by themselves, and no. Such amount "movie star" in the film, I think, there was not a single producer in the world (Correct if I'm wrong). I remember only the eccentric film in 1994 by Robert Altman "High Fashion" with a huge number of stars in the major and minor roles.
And we did not even know what a frame does not look - the best actors, the relatives of the best actors, "star" and all that. " Reminds me of the Brazilian soap operas, where every movie the same person, only the names of different movies
Could it be called the audience "so stupid" you need all the "chew" and skip all the "stars" in one bouquet? In my opinion, it looks ridiculous and wrong.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от luka77

Could it be called the audience "so stupid" you need everything to "chew" and show all the "stars" in one bouquet? In my opinion, it looks ridiculous and wrong.

Do not know what's wrong. In fact, do not show stars and film quality. Since stars are easier. But I repeat - cinema, art director. And movie ticket depends on the star-shaped structure. And in the "chewing" it is not "dumb audience," and for the actors. "Stars" are faster material ...
After all, we will go to star of the faster than the "young".

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Buscador

But I repeat - cinema, art director.

That's a strong director and not take boitsya unknown persons.
A commercial movie stars, stupid viewers and lures.
Even before the name of the movie are the names of those from the "Star-ended. Is not "chewing?
Well, go on star of faster, go ...
And I better Ioseliani with unknown actors or even with no professionals will watch than this Mikhalkov with his company of celebrities in every episode ...

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Here is a strong director and not boitsya taken by unknown persons.
A commercial movie stars, stupid viewers and lures.
Even before the name of the movie are the names of those from the "Star-ended". Is not "chewing"?
Well, go on star of faster, go ...
And I better Josseliani with unknown actors, or even with non-professionals will watch than this Mikhalkov with a company of celebrities in every episode ...

I agree! One of my favorite films - "And there was light", where there are no actors.
This artist does not have to sing ditties thieves before the authorities ...

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Eriksson

One of my favorite films - "And there was light", where there are no actors.

Many of his film in this ten outstanding include.
Incidentally, in Venice in 1989 he was given a special jury prize for him.
And my favorite at Ioseliani film "Hab mavis" and then, "Listopad".

[Сергей Дородный]

I love Ioseliani, especially the "Favorites of the Moon" and "And there was light."
And I have to Mikhalkov RH complicated. He is in some interviews in position defender "large format" film. And I'm inclined to believe that his stance. If you let him through, and his films will be preserved in some way part of the studios Staged (Staged and environment), it is still a plus. (Although the overall economy and the cult of such an approach would certainly open to question).
Modern conditionally - "young and talented" directors for films like staging do not take (well, from the fact that I saw),
directors of the middle generation (for the most part, children of former ") - took some movies with a big part of the staging - well kashmar, wretchedness.

Well, that is - came from a good director position - protektorirovat cinema - and this idea was stronger than the artist. A stop and not shoot - no power (yes with some options).

And watch these protectionist fylmy I do not fetch a roll.
I want to ease as I Ioseliani and Fellini.

 
All Pts recommend the film "Losers" (France, 2009 or 2010).
Glitter, just a renaissance of the best French tradition.
However, looking at the art-house production of "35 mm", where it can still be seen, do not know.