Pre-auction display at Sotheby's History Museum

[LCR]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I'm not understand the nature of your denial.

For example, the Iranian miniature you like about it?

Or, say, Sudeikin?

By Otto Dix?

Persian miniature I really love (but shit Gudiashvili not have to do with it), to Sudeikin reacted with goodwill, Dix did not like (but do not mix with the dirt just do not watch)

Here, the questions answered.
I hope that now everything is clear for you

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

I do not understand the nature of your denial.

And I do not understand the nature of his ascension. example ... What can you do .. ) "There are many in this world, Horatio ..."

[Синица]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

And I do not understand the nature of his ascension. example ...

Nature may be at least two (together or separately):
1. Individual taste
2. Commercial Project - Producing someone collections.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

And I do not understand the nature of his ascension.

It's simple: the artist who created his own world of images, as they say.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

It's simple: the artist who created his own world of images, as they say.

But not all "his world of images" can not convey to the public ... Where is the "driving force" buried?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

But not all "his world of images" can not convey to the public ... Where is the "driving force" buried?

In the credibility or the charm of these images, I guess.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

In the persuasiveness or the charm of these images, I guess.
     

No, "treated kindly during his lifetime-treated kindly, and after death .. And how many sofa Sloley attics rot, gathering dust (at best) "worlds of images, there are no statistics?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

No, no, "treated kindly-treated kindly during his lifetime and after death ..

And why was not "treated kindly," for example, Alexander Bazhbeuk-Melikian?

After all, it is no less significant artist than Gudiashvili, and no less "strange" for the ruling Soviet flavor.

But Gudiashvili become a popular artist of the USSR, and Bazhbeuk interrupted on bread and water.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And why was not "treated kindly," for example, Alexander Bazhbeuk-Melikyan?

You probably know better (maybe, "personal qualities"?)
I am so very strange that in the era of "forced realism" Vozmlzhny such heinous error in the proportions of (unjustified stylistics, IMHO)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And why was not "treated kindly," for example, Alexander Bazhbeuk-Melikyan?

1. "With Women", 1927, x. /M, 49,5 x47 cm, NGA, Yerevan.
2. "Bathers", 1929, x. /M, 48x50 cm, private collection of L. Eloy.
3. "Figures", 1928, x. /M, 54x47 cm, NGA, Yerevan.
4. "Acrobat", 1965, x. /M, 48x48 cm, private collection of M. Sukhanova, Cyprus.
5. "Yard", 1964, x. /M, 50x33 cm, private collection of L. Bazhbeuk-Melikian.
I must confess, too, is such a difference to the authorities to the artist is not clear.
Such a rise of disgraced Gudiashvili: in 1972 awarded the title People's Artist of USSR, and in 1976, Hero of Socialist Labor, whereas Bazhbeuk-Melikyan only honored artist of Georgian SSR. But he died before "takeoff" Gudiashvili, but this "rise" was, of course, local authorities organized, needed a living classic, "our all" in the painting, I think.
Although Bazhbeuk-Melikyan more interesting will be.