The picture was not going to give the owner

[Eriksson]

Сообщение от khmelev

In Belgium, he designed all of the documents so as to get back the taxes, ie, that the subject was tax-free. At the current means of communication, obviously, with the export operation by Belgian customs became known in Russia, to whom it is necessary.
Thus arose the legal conflict.

Taksfri can be issued only one company /store that participates in the international system. Certainly not in the church community. This is the first.

Tax on the transaction will pay the ecclesial community, ie seller, and not the buyer. This is the second.

Tax on sold to Russia (or all early to) painting will pay Pevsner, in any case. Tax will be charged on the amount of profit. For art objects - a special tax scheme.

The only way to evade tax - to issue a transaction at an undervalue and indicate a loss. I do not think that the Russian Museum has gone to such a scam.
This is the third.

And finally - the main thing. No need to build a conspiracy theory in the region, which is not too great competence.

[khmelev]

Сообщение от Eriksson

Taksfri can be issued only one company /store that participates in the international system. Certainly not in the church community. This is the first.
***
And finally - the main thing. No need to build a conspiracy theory in the region, which is not too great competence.

***
Thanks for the advice
You'll never buy an expensive painting "export" from the EU? With the shipping company is certified to export - in France for more than 150 oil t.evro it is formally required. I think, and in Belgium the same rules. And the same office will help make the paper on which the return (slowly and with a squeak) VAT.
  Mr. Pevsner bought the painting for a considerable amount - just more than 200 tons
On arrival in Russia in the declaration have some ridiculous price - something 1000 euro - as Mr. Ix
Then, figuratively speaking, took a taxi and drove up to now the Russian Museum, which passed on the procurement committee for 400 m. euros.
  On the one hand untruthful declaration. On the other hand, without examination nobody would give him an opportunity for dekoarirovat this picture, as Briullov $ 200 m.
  It's a stalemate, a conflict that appears to somehow be resolved.
  Incidentally, it is possible that the painting was sold through some intermediaries and not the fact that he personally Pevzner, and perhaps also kauyu something ofshorku.
  But information about the situation with the export from Belgium and periperiyah with the declaration and the timing of Russia is correct.

[ФАИв]

Сообщение от khmelev

***

Then, figuratively speaking, took a taxi and drove up to now the Russian Museum, which passed on the procurement committee for 400 m. euros.
 

And is known about its intentions to sell the painting is RM? It seemed to me that he wanted to get an authoritative opinion (examination). The designer then the temporary admission? Or have I missed something?


 From the decision on bringing Pevsner as the accused: "March 18, 2003, with intent to sell paintings K. Bryullov" Christ in the tomb of the State Russian Museum, the purpose of evading payment of customs duties Pevzner said customs officials and declare the deliberately false information about the purpose of Import pictures, customs regime and its cost ... On the basis of his statement, Pevzner fill in a customs declaration in their name, without attribution, the names and pictures of value, doubtfully declare the painting in a privileged mode of temporary import ... ».

And if the temporary importation, you will hardly going to sell in Russia.

[khmelev]

at that time was quite a lot of people who have had to imagine a regime of temporary import dozens of paintings. No tool to punish, or find these people to recover from their duty or anything like that there was no and no. Imagine arriving alien, brings a picture of $ 10 million, draws up the temporary import and leaves ... That's all. He is not in nature, he vanished into the air.
And where is this picture?
When our paperwork no one ever no one and nothing will look. I think that's the way it happened.
  Another thing that Pevsner, that were called. Now offering this very serious people in Russia, Pevzner deserted road.
The fact that he bought it and was going to do with her one already deceased dealer hit where you want, and then - business equipment.

[ФАИв]

Well then you know better ...

[khmelev]

I do not know better then that. Just a lot of years ago, a late friend of mine has told me in detail all the circumstances of this story.
Maybe something he exaggerated about something not know, but overall, I think, outline presented correctly.
It will end all that Pevsner somehow be fined, will give him a picture (or what remains of it) and it's over.
  By the way, about this terrible scandal stories was timing.
What do you think, why?

[Маруся]

Сообщение от khmelev; 1444741"

will end all that Pevsner somehow be fined, will give him the picture (, or what remains of it) and it's over.

This is the biggest problem - we just lose our unique work of art! In addition, the timing disgrace to the whole world, and thanks to our imperfect laws of the Russian Federation will pay a considerable compensation, when after all the twists and turns in the Russian courts Pevzner will contact Evrpeysky court. That's really the compensation awarded by the European Court, Russia pays the fine. Only will we see after this very picture?

[Евгений]

Сообщение от khmelev; 1444741"

will end all that Pevsner somehow be fined, will give him a picture (or what remains of it) and it's over

Everything is much worse for the owner of the picture ..
-----------------------------------------------

St. Petersburg City Court upheld the refusal to return the painting of Charles Bryullova "Christ in the tomb" collector Alexander Pevzner, who is suspected of smuggling.
"The court refused to grant our appeal, which we also challenged the lower court refusing to stop for me, a criminal case under article" contraband "- said Pevzner, currently located in Germany, the RIA Novosti news agency.
FSB collector suspects in smuggling paintings from Belgium to Russia with the aim of further legalization by placing in the State Russian Museum. Pevsner himself claims that he had brought the painting for restoration.

Now the "Christ in the tomb is located in storage at the Russian Museum as evidence.

Read more: http://www.gzt.ru/topnews/accidents/...rom=copiedlink

[Eriksson]

There was nothing else I personally did not expect.
Pevzner - a bitter lesson: to know where you climb.

[ФАИв]

This is a simple reket, only the public.
In general - where cops and FSBshniki - solid disgrace to the country