Shishkin

[sergejnowo]

uriart, on information from the Internet, the work is called "Oak Grove" and is located in Kiev.

Added after 13 minutes
Frankly, I like Shishkin only on postcards and in books on art.
And in some places even afraid of living.
Who has seen the work of "Morning in a Pine Forest" live, I think confirm. On the idea of coloring, in my eyes dreamer, a sample compete with Rembrandt in the theme with shades of black. This story should be happy, the bears should be similar to the bears, dawn itself mysterious thing.
But II Rembrandt did not like the plot and never found a place in his works. There strashilka not work.

[Артём]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

This story should be happy, the bears should be similar to the bears, dawn itself mysterious thing.

The idea suggested to her Shishkin, KA Savitsky, but do not exclude the possibility that the impetus for the emergence of landscape paintings in 1888 served as the "Fog in a pine forest," written in all probability, as the "windfall", after a trip to Vologda forests.


Apparently, "Fog in a pine forest, has successfully exhibited in a traveling exhibition in Moscow (now in private collections in Czechoslovakia) gave birth to a Shishkin and Savitsky mutual desire to write a similar motives of landscape to include It kind of genre scenes frolicking with bears. After all, the leitmotif of famous paintings in 1889 is precisely the mist in a pine forest. Judging by the description caught in Czechoslovakia, the landscape, the background of his plot with a dense forest like a distant view full of oil sketch for the painting "Morning in a Pine Forest, owned by the State Tretyakov Gallery. And it once again confirms the possibility of the relationship of the two paintings. Apparently, on the design Shishkin (ie the way they were designed landscapes), Savitsky, and wrote the bears in the picture. These bears with some differences in attitudes and number (first there were two) appear in all the preparatory sketches and sketches Shishkin. And there were many. Only in one State Russian Museum, seven pencil sketches of options. Bears have turned a Savitzky so successful that he even signed with Shishkin in the picture. However, it has acquired P. Tretyakov removed signature, deciding to adopt for this picture only authorship Shishkin. After all, it "from conception and ending with the execution, everything speaks of the manner of painting, the creative method, proper to Shishkin".

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

And live in some places even terrified.
Who has seen the work of "Morning in a Pine Forest" live, I think confirm.

You talking about?
Masterpiece!

[lazycat]

Сообщение от Sandro

Shishkin Pts. easy to confirm (this course), for example Grabar, there is a large set of standard X-rays, so it's simple and easy - tell almost immediately - take a job or not.

About a large set of standard X-rays in the Grabar - this is a funny joke? For me - ofigenno funny.

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

was not too lazy to come down to admire Shishkin.
Incidentally, its bulk and cost.
And this is curious. At estimeyt note.
Yes, I think, many already familiar with this work.

Hügelige Landschaft mit Kiefern im Sonnenlicht
Hammer price EUR 160,000
EUR 160,000 - USD 203,728 - GBP 139,024
Estimate EUR 10,000
Medium Oil /canvas
Sales date 06 Dec 2008
Location Berlin (DE)
Size 37x61 cm - (14 5/8x24 in)
Auction house Reiner Dannenberg Auktionshaus
Dated 1889
Lot number 1695
Distinguishing marks - Bas Droite
Illustrations P. 366 of the catalogue

What this Shishkin not? Regular forumskie pictures from the series "do not believe"?? I saw this Shishkina alive, it is a worthy.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

about me fufel last year at the schloss-ahlden, I showed it on the forum, and this work, one hand. They and the origin of "one - of a Berlin.

Here I agree with you. But I judge differently, I do not see live, but I see what you can see even in poor reproduction - the idea and composition. I Shishkina one depended on another, it's all good masters so. He had an idea (in all jobs) the majesty of nature in general and the majesty of nature in Russia. And he did it through some kind of major figure, or rather, in his case, through some kind of large mass, a tree or group of trees and they are very expressive and always central. He has no boring tracks. He has a tree-king (oak in the middle of the field) or a group of compressed or greatness is expressed, as in the ship's wood. A discussion of the painting "from the Berlin" we have nothing. Boring composition - the division of the canvas almost in half, not the main "character" or group. A tree that could receive special attention of the viewer crooked!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от lazycat

What's wrong with this Shishkin not? Regular forumskie pictures from the series "I do not believe "???

Where are you "joke" saw in my post?
Only a very low estimate.
And the mass of the proposals of this thing during the year from different dealers different prices.
All.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Viktor Ivanov me once told me.

They were students Surikovsky Institute, led them to the Tretyakov Gallery, facing Shishkin, before the "rye", viewed with some irony, condescension.

Past runs Dejneka Alexander:

- What ironiziruete? Just look at how to take!

Dejneka with its bell tower accurately expressed.

And Shishkin, and Deineka were able to take the motif.

And, incidentally, both were colourists (except for works in gouache early - mid 1930's in Deineki).

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от K-Maler

And the tree that could receive special attention of the viewer crooked!

You are such a tree have in mind?

Добавлено через 2 минуты

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And by the way, both were colourists

this explains a lot.

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And by the way, both were colourists

this explains a lot.

[lazycat]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Where are you "joke" saw in my post?
Only a very low estimate.
And the mass of the proposals of this thing during the year from different dealers different prices.
All.

Low estimate of nothing said. Well the Germans did not believe in the authenticity of, well, thank God! The main thing that work fine, Shishkin such written very much in Sestroretsk.

I am always more pleased: here most active "writers" Shishkina seen only in museums and in the picture. But I have always been actively discussing it, what Nifiga not understand.