Bozena Rynska: "I hate modern art"

[artcol]

Сообщение от Eugene

"WE - NOT fuckers, fuckers - not us" (B. Rynska)
It was in London. They invited us to dinner at a collector of contemporary art. And from the doorway, he took us to inspect their purchase. Gone zakoryuki, hrenoviny and stains. And finally the host, beaming with pride for their cultural values, leads us to the finale: a silver tripod, which neatly coiled coiled sausage. Also silver. Wiener - not in the sense of pepperoni and mortadella, and human feces, morning chair, very naturally recreated from precious metals.
And the owner, who looked absolutely normal rich, tenacious kind of guy, slaps a piece of shit around the wings and painted with inspiration, which, it turns out, the author of this masterpiece embellisher: to give the artifact a natural brown shade, urinated on the feces. And the result of oxidation - enthusiastically continued to master - and the effect appeared authenticity!

Читать дальше... 

In Moscow, reported on a magical dinner in the company of secular activists. At least three people for me uncomfortable. Look at each other, looking with regret: I mean, this work should be viewed in the context ...
Oh, I love all these collectors contexts. They have their dao - Stainless and us, Lohamei inaccessible. Perhaps, this work seems to you unattractive - people say, routinely in the art, but it has an investment value.
Once art-fixers handed publisher Nike Tserkov catalog. Nick opened, and clutched at his head: There was a detailed statement to the schedule more expensive per square centimeter of each artist in the past ten years. For example, from three dollars to 15 thousand.

Donald Thompson, a Harvard professor and researcher of contemporary art believes that the investment value of the works of contemporary art - is a myth. Of the five fires a maximum of one basket. But economist John Picard Stein general has estimated that investment in art a little more profitable to purchase government bonds. But the art crooks these arguments are not decree. They continue patronizing tone: "There is a good Pupkin - a pig on a rope from the intestines. Not yet rated. But rotting cow's head, and dead flies Hearst bought at one time he Saatchi.

In fact, the carcass, which was shown at a recent exhibition in Moscow, was not a pig, calf and evisceration, but it all depends on the context ... Who are you now in the collection, calf, hang? Who persuaded that you, like a rotten head of his mother-cow is about to rise in price? And how the head of a man who not only puts on a tripod oxidized urine of a piece of shit natural color, but also radiates from her, admires her - the queen of my heart?

Here it should be noted that the oligarchs malosimpatichnye people, but not feeble-minded. And if these people buy the tripe for the unimaginable amount, maybe it's me - a reactionary and obscurantist penniless. Here arises the basic question of modern art, which haunts me to this: if varnished piece of shit, because she is a somebody needs? So who exactly? The market, generally speaking, the concept is not faceless. This is a bunch of very rich people who create the demand for and disgusting. That is, the demand for decay, dead flies, cow cakes, pig on a rope from his own intestines.

Expose corrupt sharks and amateurs viscerated calves can be - be careful. Rubanesh shoulder, and you're trapped, "but what if it turns out the ice after 50 some sort (that is, if your still living) that you're really not catching up. Khrushchev, remember that modern art did not understand: You mean you do not know how to draw! My grandson and it is better to draw! .. Why no one eye? And why the Kremlin without teeth! And historical experience shows that all the geniuses worked proactively, and retrograde and obscurantist shouted to them in the back: "Is that really the eye? Over Picasso fun. Matisse did not take.
-------------------------------------------------- -------
curator killed in the artist's artist, because a good artist to the curator - a dead artist. Can you draw a cow, mocks curator, well, congratulations, go showcases milk paint. Live cow now useless. That's dead, but with the guts out and the hook from the ceiling - is the theme. The depth of thought in this - with the nozzle on the saucer. And who is not solved puzzle - that goof. Engine of all these kontseptmeykrov one - frenzied desire to wrest from life, if not five stars, so at least four plus.
-------------------------------------------------- --------
Art Curator controlled. No risk. Talent, creator, charisma areas inaccessible money. Creator of the heavenly hierarchy is clearly above the merchant. Capital had long since bought a right to appoint carrion singers. Now bought the right to appoint artists. Roughly speaking, we had all this so-called talent in principle - that's who we appoint as art, he will. We are of you, talented, not dependent. We are certain God has not given, not bestowed, but we have to answer vzduem price of emptiness as it is inflated to ourselves - ordinary boys and girls, floated out in the muddy water ninety-two thousandth. Merchants who rebelled against the gift of God, set your own diktat: zabashlyaem right now and recognize the work of art a piece of shit.
-------------------------------------------------- ------------
http://becky-sharpe.livejournal.com/663823.html

Dear Eugene, have always been artists, to e-selling illusions. Now the development of technical means devalued the individual skill, but a master of illusion did not disappear. But this is also part of the art scene and art market.

Shl But in Kulik, for example, is difficult to invest. But it does not create, and destroy the illusion. But he, too - sovrisk to e-hates B. Rynska. Talking about sovriske with positions AB Rynska - a mauvais ton and banal ignorance.

[Posav]

Сообщение от artcol

Shl But in Kulik, for example, is difficult to invest. But it does not create, and destroy the illusion. But he, too - sovrisk to e-hates Brynskih. Talking about sovriske from positions Brynskih - a mauvais ton and banal ignorance.

Why, very simply, if there are interested political forces. For example, how important the mission of zagonyaniya shovel to liberal capitalism.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Posav

Why, very simply, if there are interested political forces. For example, how important the mission of zagonyaniya shovel to liberal capitalism.

In any process there are the forces involved. But everyone sees that it is closer and more understandable.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Eugene

agrees with this ..
A small request, name Bozena-Rynska write properly ..

Yes, of course, how could I!

[Евгений]

Сообщение от artcol

What is the society, so is its upper layer. What is the top layer - and this is the art of e-it (layer) to taste. But B. Rynska not speak about this

It is not a political commentator .. Oligarchs Russia is still Russia ..

[artcol]

Сообщение от Eugene

Oligarchs Russia is still Russia ..

... but a substantial part of it.

Сообщение от Eugene

It is not a political commentator ...

Who is she?

[Pavel]

Beauty Bozhenochka played the role of the boy, who said: "A king is naked. Can only add that this deshevkaSov lawsuit - not art, but a political farce.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Pavel

Beauty Bozhenochka played the role of the boy, who said: "A king is naked. Can only add that this deshevkaSov lawsuit - not art, but a political farce.

You want to say that she is also sincere, simple and naive?

[eva777]

In LiveJournal its article read like something more organic, but here in our forum, it looks vulgar. IMHO it is now realized, because, quite recently, too, her story is "post". The fact that in art, not only in the modern, but вобще, she understands little and sometimes nothing at all
A boast of their stupidity, usually poorly educated people. Yes, and education does not depend on the availability of diplomas

[artcol]

Сообщение от eva777

A boast of their stupidity, usually poorly educated people.

And they are not able to understand it. But let's not strict: B. Rynska - just journalist, secular chronicler .