Help to evaluate an old painting

[Кирилл Сызранский]

I agree with this:

Сообщение от Dogel

printed products!!!!!

[QUOTE="Михалыч;3281631"]print on It Bumaga@

[Пряник]

[QUOTE=Кирилл Сызранский;3294971]Repeat: I soglasen@
That, and thank you for this.
Sincerely,

[ANATOLY]

Cake Show live any more or less discussed in the painting and it will become clear.Photo practically, this work is not to determine.

[laut201422]

the picture somewhere 1830. where then could print?

[laut201422]

??????????????????????

[Artoil-A]

Сообщение от laut201422

picture somewhere 1830. where then could print?

That's not talking about gang printing, and art.
Also
http://www.mrprint.com.ua/istoriya-pechat

[K-Maler]

[QUOTE="Artoil-A;3272071"]'m detailing their opinions, time is prohibited. Moreover, I do not use photoshop.
And the price, if the artist is known and follower of rafaelito, I think, tens of thousands and more dollarov@

Doubt correct. Serf artists did not write the image of the virgin Mary in a Catholic style. It is not an icon, and the picture on the theme of "Madonna with child". Weak imitation of Raphael. Artist somewhere studied or freely copied... be expensive, it can not, weak execution.
Or is it a reproduction, perhaps, painted and varnished for safety.

[Пряник]

Сообщение от K-Maler

Or it's a reproduction, perhaps, painted and varnished for safety.

I ask for clarification regarding printing.
As I understand it, the reproduction is called everything to do with copying the image.
-lithography;
-etching;
-woodcut;
-zincography;
-offset printing;
the stencil;
-high printing, etc.
That is, any method of mechanical transfer of the original image on the paper (plate, plywood, canvas) in color, or with the subsequent coloring paints by hand.
But then the icons should be recognized, "printed products", because the canonical images were also written on the "writings".
I beg you to explain why the image of oil paints (with coloring and brush marks on the tree without the presence of the underlying layer of paper is also sometimes considered to be "printed products". How was it done?
With respect and hope for Your answer,

[Artoil-A]

Сообщение от Пряник

implore to explain about printing.
As I understand it, the reproduction is called everything to do with copying the image.
-lithography;
-etching;
-woodcut;
-zincography;
-offset printing;
the stencil;
-high printing, etc.
That is, any method of mechanical transfer of the original image on the paper (plate, plywood, canvas) in color, or with the subsequent coloring paints by hand.
But then the icons should be recognized, "printed products", because the canonical images were also written on the "writings".
I beg you to explain why the image of oil paints (with coloring and brush marks on the tree without the presence of the underlying layer of paper is also sometimes considered to be "printed products". How was it done?
With respect and hope for Your answer,

The drawings are, as a rule, this contour drawings. Contours are transferred on primed Board. Clarifies. And next comes the fill paint.
Print... considered only print transfer method: using a press, stencil and sponge, printing device and so on

[redbor]

Do not understand something
One picture? The Cake or laut201422 ? HP who among you reading?