French artists

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

but it is your-Bernadsky, Stolyarenko, Efimenko?

Yes, mine. Although. No, извените, not mine ... How quickly everything is flying. But in good hands - that's for sure.

Сообщение от Mihail

the first not far removed.

Are you serious?

[LCR]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

Still, I showed the work of artists, I think!

In my opinion, you only think

[Mihail]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

Yes, mine.

Are you serious?

Yes, vobschem there is a difference, but your lilac is not the best

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

Here are a few cans of ......

Saw these works live - and the first AP Stolyarenko B. Bernadsky - very good. I think this Bernadsky auctioned "Golden Section" ...

[color="# 666686"]Added after 9 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Mihail

yes, vobschem there is a difference, but your lilac is not the best

There is no limit to perfection. And what best for you? P Konchalovsky? So he has been different. And these are very professional and artistic ... And if you compare both nekorektno artists, then further Velazquez, Monet, M. Vrubel .... We will not leave ...

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от Mihail

yes, vobschem there is a difference, but your lilac is not the best

You know, it looks like something silly. Certainly not the best. I think what is better and which worse, we do not compare with you. These works are very professional. I think this is enough. V. Bernadsky studied with B. Yoganson and is the only national artist of Russia and Ukraine (simultaneously).
I understand that by themselves do not always speak the title of the skill (know examples). But Bernadsky and Stolyarenko is not. It's the artists who have a say in the painting. And today these little ...

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

Извените, but it is impossible to compare

should always compare. You proved that you have had a strong artistic foundation with a very good painter, but the motives of a few banal. And Gerasimov not commonplace, and the result of admiration.
Especially you two first still-life-more technology than plastic solutions. In the tone is very monotonous. Where the table legs to create some tonal game, but a lot of performances. This tea can be simplified enough white spots and glare and prevent the overall volume of perception, melteshat. One is struck by the desire to impressionism, more light. But light is only on the dark and find harmony and to Impressionism.

[Mihail]

Сообщение от Semen Semenovich

You know, it looks like something silly. Certainly not the best. I think what is better and which worse, we do not compare with you. These works are very professional. I think this is enough. V. Bernadsky studied with B. Yoganson and is the only national artist of Russia and Ukraine (simultaneously).
I understand that by themselves do not always speak the title of the skill (know examples). But Bernadsky and Stolyarenko is not. It's the artists who have a say in the painting. And today these little ...

You yourself have compared the above "their work" with the works shown Cyril and have concluded that your best, do not you?!? So that "your work" just to be over ... I compare them with others, and concluded that they are not the best .. All right, you see ...
And please, do not deny me the right to compare ...

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от Mihail

I have compared them with others, and concluded that they are not the best ..

Say not the best - not to compare with some others. The authors, for sure, they also do not believe their best. And I'm not saying that shown me (not mine) - is better than shown later. I said that they can not even compare. And you in your rights, of course, no one can not fail.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 9 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Pavel

should always compare. You proved that you have had a strong artistic foundation with a very good painter, but the motives of a few banal. And Gerasimov not commonplace, and the result of admiration.
Especially you two first still-life-more technology than plastic solutions. In the tone is very monotonous. Where the table legs to create some tonal game, but a lot of performances. This tea can be simplified enough white spots and glare and prevent the overall volume of perception, melteshat. One is struck by the desire to impressionism, more light. But light is only on the dark and find harmony and to Impressionism.

Interesting professional analysis, but I can not fully agree. We Stolyarenko - not transferred well to the color photos. Yes, and what motives. First - clean sketch, quick and very juicy. Other - staging, especially the latter. And he - more commercial, was written in May last year for the gallery.

[Pavel]

I liked how the last time, he is more creative, some kind of a situation more interesting, the teapot, I said, and evidently the result of an order.
Palette knife is not so juicy. Etudes certainly good, but it is juicy when he felt the tone. Color appears himself, if calculated palette. But this is between us. Look a little still life.

[Pavel]

Still, on the French try. Material from the Gazette de Drouot in 1994.