Maurice Denis (1870-1943)

[fross]

Сообщение от Marjana

Did you try. Maybe get
Here Art-Lover is more analysts, and apparently not under hypnosis, not as succinctly as a Doctor - intelligibly, and in popular form.: Shy:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=23715

This is a variation on the search for the philosopher's stone in modern interpretation, even in popular form. If you are interested in the topic itself, it read like a psychologist Daniel Kahneman (Daniel Kahneman). It was the way the 2002 Nobel Prize in economics.

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от fross

This is a variation on the search for the philosopher's stone in modern interpretation, even in popular form. If you are interested in the topic itself, it read like a psychologist Daniel Kahneman (Daniel Kahneman). It was the way the 2002 Nobel Prize in economics .

fross, I protest! You can not belittle such a noble seekers of the philosopher's stone, to compare them with modern economists and psychologists!

It is interesting to note that American economist Vernon Smith, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in economics along with Kahneman, is his constant opponent, arguing that the experimental verification basically confirms (but does not refute) the familiar to economists, the principles of rational behavior. The decision of the Nobel Committee divided equally Prize in economics in 2002 between critics and advocates a model of rational "economic man" is noticeable not only academic objectivity, but also the peculiar irony of the situation in modern economic science, where different approaches used by about the same popularity.

: D