At that living contemporary artists

[Семен Семенович]

Сообщение от Buscador

Is this a repeat?

Yes, the author's repeated, "written on the sketches at the request of the family Karachentseva. And that portrait, as far as I know, is with Viktor Chernomyrdin. While here I could be wrong ...

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Veronic

Say, Kirill, who do you think must draw green grass or blue sky? Name the profession, please.

In Soviet times, none of the artists do not see anything to be ashamed to do something on the order and do well. At the Combine, where he heard orders to know who is better able to do. Someone was doing sketches for a box of chocolates or greeting cards, someone - for a book someone copy someone portraits, etc. Who does not know how - the watchman, etc. Today, instead of all this, everyone wants to landscapes for tourists ... The founders of this genre were, for example, brothers Canaletto ... You can do well, or treated as "decorative" genre ... okay ... But I'm trying to say about another ... Even in these plots can search for ... Then they should otherwise displayed and sold at different prices ... Artists produce very much, this is a problem ... Restrict the set? Same problem, many will lose their jobs ...

[Самвел]

I think today is simply no artists, there are certainly people who love their craft, as well fishing, they delabt with pleasure, but nothing sverhsshibatelnogo they have not, I think it's just today's time, at some point as a bud-a then the spirit left the creative people. If not, please give at least 10 names in any field of culture, I mean the years since the 90's, buyout, would clearly have been worthy of recognition. But 30 years have passed.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Samvel

at some point as a bud-a spirit left the creative people. If not, please give at least 10 names in any field of culture, I mean the years since the 90's, buyout, would clearly have been worthy of recognition. But 30 years have passed.

You're right. Currently still working then, the previous generation, and it can still influence. But there is disappointment. Do not expect that from freedom ... There is a sense, nevertheless, discuss the exhibition, because they exposed the fact that the curators are selected. And this is now very strongly biased preferences. I know one "regular" show, where in order to highlight preferred the idea of specially chosen is the "environment" that it was not better, is chosen as the background. From the fairly good works, but "toothless" ... Do not spectacular and did not differ greatly manners (not SH). Catch a professional, artists are not aware of it. I saw both denied several spectacular works that would be necessary to notice, in favor of more modest sketches of the same artists. And do you trust "exhibited" review. Some artists in protest at longer displayed.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от K-Maler

in order to highlight preferred the idea of specially chosen is the "environment" that it was not better, is chosen as the background. From the fairly good works, but "toothless" ... Do not spectacular and did not differ greatly manners (not SH). Catch a professional, artists are not aware of it.

What terrible things you are telling. This is a common practice?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Vladimir

This is a common practice?

This was during the Soviet period. At the exhibition next to the alleged tsentalnymi things two or three "generals" had strong things ordinary members of the SC did not take. "Why overload the exhibition?" "This is for later ..." etc. In both regions, in Moscow and St. Petersburg can and girlfriends?

[spigo]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

It's in the Soviet period was

Even M. Georgian. "Painters generals" were in charge of non-conformism exhibition schedule, the installation and so naturally in their favor.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от LCR

"First of all, not with his daughter, and son, and secondly, not" race "and" Flight to Egypt "!"

Ridiculous ...
But I was in the Russian laughed. Ran just past the "Boatmen", and there are many people (later realized was a Sabbath) and listen to someone. I understand that the story is not full-time guide, and someone from the visitors. Stopped and listened.
Uncle must be 60 years old, with gray head. He is on the first photo on the left. Very snobbish pontificate about burlatskuyu life-"share-dolyushku.
Most of all I liked the place: "... pull. And at this time in St. Petersburg overdressed ladies look at them from the shore." : D
At this point I could not restrain himself, and trying not rassmeyatsya, noticed that in the village that Shiryaevo front of Samara in 1870, hardly walked Petersburg lady-"overdressed."
Then uncle agreed poblagadaril have a normal voice, not pathos. Then came a voice from the people "that they asked about Repin Democrat and almost revolyutsionnera. I had to remember the history of the "Boatmen" and a biography of Elijah Yefimovich, about the Grand Duke Vladimir Alexandrovich and his billiard room, about the World Fair in Vienna in 1873, about the words Witte barge haulers on the work and so on: D: D: D

[eva777]

Сообщение от Seriy

İyem, as far as I understand, developerstvom-t e business with the land, building, etc. .. Their work, they often just give ... Referred to the artist owns a piece of land where he built a business center, next to the Pushkin Museum.

Pomo, had built and rented, I do not remember exactly how to put stuff there.

Portraits of him are very expensive, and drawn again almost all the State Duma, this is a commitment.

As for business I know nothing, everything is possible



[color="# 666686"]Posted 1 hour 20 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Samvel

I think today just do not artists, there are certainly people who love their craft, as well fishing, they delabt with pleasure, but nothing sverhsshibatelnogo they have not, I think it's just today's time, in certain moment as a bud-then some spirit left the creative people. If not, please give at least 10 names in any field of culture, I mean the years since the 90's, buyout, would clearly have been worthy of recognition. But 30 years have passed.

1. Slepyshev A.
2. Teryushin S.
3. Nikitin V.
4. K. Golitsyn
5. Zubarev V.
6. Chernyshev V.
7. Buch, A. (unfortunately already dead)
8. Bruj B.
9. Medvedev K.
10. Volokhov S.
they do. Everybody has their own style. Each of them recognizable. And they all love their craft. And doing it with pleasure!

[K-Maler]

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Vladimir

What terrible things you are telling. This is a common practice?

Yes. At the beginning of the restructuring have not been, and the exhibition were packed with a variety of things, it was not hanging up and it was unclear what would happen next. It was interesting to watch, hopes were high ... Hung next to things in different directions and competed ... And it was correct. And then (I do not know. Where it was agreed) was to form what in relation to the actions of their group declares M. Gelman: "... choose 50 people and spins, others do not." That's something like this occurs. Now the artist can provide a number of works for a large exhibition, which comes "all" only if it is paid exhibition and pays himself. This is the only moment of independence, and this applies to all directions. The theoretical treatment is also underway. A little problem that the Internet ... as you see ...