Artist Ixygon

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Seriy

I used the search on the forum. On meaningful wrote Chavannes only LCR, and she called him Pyuvis . Another wrote about him qwerty. Blast people knew the name , but not always correct .
And that's all .

This, of course , well , that the forum for you is a source of knowledge. But ...
- cabbage , mother, of course, is a good thing , but it should be kept in the house and meat snacks . ( c) < ! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Seriy

log Orsay I now seriously interested in this Puvis, which should be used to find the book.

Internet Puvis and scored his paintings, information about it and so forth ...

[Peter]

Сообщение от K-Maler

Internet Puvis and scored his paintings, information about it , and so ...

Also: "Gauguin decorated his cabin reproductions Manet, Puvis de Chavannes , Degas , Rembrandt , Raphael, Michelangelo and Holbein ... When one of the neighbors admired the "Olympia" Manet and Gauguin asked , it was not his wife , he said utverditelno.Pozzhe the woman agreed to pose for him .. . (J . Rewald ) ... in addition, Puvis de Chavannes (1824-1898) was quite trendy French painter and had an impact on our Borisov- Musatov and Pavel Kuznetsov.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от Peter

Borisov-Musatov, and Pavel Kuznetsov.

And Lev.
Let's see, and Monticelli:

[Fed]

In order to decide - who are very influenced by Van Gogh, just look at these works Monticelli:

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Peter

had an impact on our Borisov-Musatov, and Pavel Kuznetsov.

A Petrov-Vodkin forgot: "In the bypass and the Louvre and the latest trends, I trulivo, though covertly, de Chavannes Pyuvisom admired."

 
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Seriy]

K-Maler, we have with you , probably , different internet :-) In RuNet is a short article from the Britannica in 1907 and copied all of the sites , so you think that a lot of articles , and she the one and only . The book is also one and the same pre-revolutionary , m e is nothing in RuNet not. If you have it scored , so references to the sketch book and study of modern de Chavannes .
Of interest is the modern view , as the cultural context has changed. And do not worry , that I do not know much about de Chavannes , I'm happy to fill that gap with your help :-)
 
Fed, it initially was not about who is affected and who is not , and that was an artist who has had great significance for his contemporaries , the forerunner of modernism , and history was then pushed into the second or third series. I do not understand how de Chavannes could influence of Van Gogh , except for the size of the canvases , but Van Gogh once wrote that influence means influence .

[Fed]

As I understand it , Van Gogh , as an esthete, just enjoying the beauty of de Chavannes , seeing rising nouveau + idyllic , which he probably wanted a soul.
About Monticelli , he wrote that he felt a continuation of this man, and that's it.

That de Chavannes " forgotten" controversial opinion. I think the presence of his work in the Pantheon , is already " pantheon " to him. And when you consider that this is probably the most memorable works in the building ...

I do not understand why the founder must be known conventional " successor " , or even be out there somewhere.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Seriy

from that Puvis Picasso made his blue period.

Picasso's Blue Period is the effect of El Greco.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Seriy; 2210691"

it originally was not about who is affected and who is not ,

 Initially, it all started with this question:

Сообщение от NATA NOVA; 2209391"

I Shishkin, Levitan , Sorokin, Pollock and Korovin have one thing in common (and most important) .. That. it?
(Really ) want to guess .
And ultimately, it's not to be taught , and understanding.

 

Сообщение от Seriy; 2209431"

NATA NOVA, one thing in common - the recognition by the public and history.

Сообщение от NATA NOVA; 2209441"

is a derivative (a side effect )

And yet, what it is, most importantly, ( and general )?