Turzhansky it?

[Игорь Гурьев]

All right.
Count up psychologically.
Leonard V. repetition of the pictures did not do.
In pryntsype.

But now written, say, a picture (in Chelyabinsk).
A brother (say) the owner of the house said to him: here are 150 rubles, write another one like it.
Leonard V. takes another canvas (exactly the same was not) and wrote as accurately as possible, but not from life but from a different cloth.

Could this be?
Definitely could.
Is it good art?
Definitely good.

[Евгений]

Is it good art.
Definitely good. [/QUOTE]
Anatoly, you oshibaetes.Zhivopis below the average level (student's).
It might be only this:
I do not understand just why it is not done in size? ... But perhaps none was originally intended to issue a copy of the author's repetition. [/QUOTE]

[Wladzislaw]

[QUOTE=\\

[Артём]

[QUOTE=\\

[Тютчев]

All there is in order and nothing to suck from different fingers flying, did not finish.
And he wrote or did not write the same stories only knows the artist and not the mother, aunt and sister. Are they watching him? That took and wrote!
Who is able to write like that? I do not Tjutchev Do ....
Here you write that you love this artist. I can not grasp how you can love and it did not understand the main principle of the creative artist, his method? That is what is the main source of knowledge about the artist. All work Tourjansky cry out that he could not even think about what to write redo. A word of relatives and friends only confirm that and so obvious for those who really loves and knows the work of Leonard Viktorovich Tourjansky.

[U_Z]

Count up psychologically.
Leonard V. repetition of the pictures did not do.
In pryntsype.

But now written, say, a picture (in Chelyabinsk).
A brother (say) the owner of the house said to him: here are 150 rubles, write another one like it.
Leonard V. takes another canvas (exactly the same was not) and wrote as accurately as possible, but not from life but from a different cloth.

Could this be?
Definitely could. [/QUOTE]

You obviously do not understand this artist! Never seen his work alive! This could not be. Show at least one copy of the accomplished author, and then speak.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Starig.
See how to register your beautiful text:

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Here you write that you love this artist. I can not grasp how you can love and it did not understand the main principle of the creative artist, his method?
That is what is the main source of knowledge about the artist.

All work Tourjansky cry out that he could not even think about what to write redo.
A word of relatives and friends only confirm that and so obvious for those who really loves and knows the work of Leonard Viktorovich Tourjansky.

I totally agree with you.
But, in my opinion, it is still Turzhansky.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от tandem

Who is able to write like that? I do not Tjutchev Do ....

And this I do not understand. Granted, painting Leonard Viktorovich copy is difficult, but still possible. I think if a professional such a task, he will be able to solve it technically, at least so that the picture of the quality (resolution), we can not determine the work is Tourjansky, or a copy. But the point is that even if the copy is better than the finest copy ever written in the history of painting, then I still do not believe in it. Just because the logic of the creative method of Leonard Viktorovich Tourjansky, he could not make copies of their works. Why he needed it! Name at least one motif, from which he would have done it?
 
That came across an interesting text. Offer it as a bar to our discussion:

«Copy Tourjansky extremely difficult. So with Turzhansky ... We must not only repeat each stroke, you need to completely go through that survived the artist himself, otherwise it will not Turzhansky.

Honored Artist of the RSFSR AN Novikov

P.S. Your question as to whether it can write better than I do not understand. Frankly, their first encounter with this approach in the context of discussions about the authenticity of the picture. Please explain what you mean. For the emotional acuity? ...

[тандем]

For the emotional acuity? ... [/QUOTE]
- manner will discuss separately.
Good roads of all the technical questions should answer confidently and without alternative. What else can I say?
Yes, about rasskrashennyh photo - can not quite technically correct way to create a named pictures. I think some of the Crimean artists laid the foundation of his career this way will correct me

[dedulya37]

[QUOTE=\\