Photo: Exhibition of nominees "Kandinsky Prize-2008"

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от passers 103385

Its the same with Malevich coupled to any attempt to drag obscenity.

What are the views entirely reactive Do not like it - is clear. Happens. Normal reaction. But it is good to try to understand whether there is really innovative things among the nominees, despite the hostile attitude? I now argue in principle that a thousand flies can not be wrong. If you nominate, it means something in this.

[fross]

Сообщение от Vladimir

What looks entirely reactive Do not like it - is clear. Happens. Normal reaction. But it is good to try to understand whether there is really innovative things among the nominees, despite the hostile attitude? I now argue in principle that a thousand flies can not be wrong. If you nominate, then something in that is.

By the principle of thousands of flies Markin holds a poll of visitors - can view on the results and handed over to?
If you find something worthy - please let me know I probably will be able to overcome himself and once again I'll go look.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Vladimir

a thousand flies can not be wrong.

Of course, if everyone knew exactly what they fly.

If you nominate, it means something in that is.
Who are the judges?

[artcol]

Сообщение от Vladimir

What looks entirely reactive Do not like it - is clear. Happens. Normal reaction. But it is good to try to understand whether there is really innovative things among the nominees, despite the hostile attitude? I now argue in principle that a thousand flies can not be wrong. If you nominate, then something in that is.

I look at the site. If I find h-n interesting - I will share.

[Прохожий]

artcol, from the standpoint of modern art your approach is not entirely correct. The fact that the site you are looking at photos just work out, so to speak, the exposition of context, ie, can not fully become co-author of the conceptual work that is unacceptable to postmodern art.
Excuse me for a sarcasm.
Here's to innovation-that's just the trouble. I do not want a sickly sigh of bezvozvaratno retired seventies, when the actual art was They reflect, ironic, subtle, while being shocking and scandalous. In the end, Conceptual commonplace at that time knew how to draw. Nowadays innovation exhibitors nominating reduced, in my opinion, the only two things: either perepevki classics, or "irony" in the faecal-genital level.
Vladimir, my reaction to what they saw is not at the level of Narva not like. I once again wonder about the criteria for art and, most importantly, the extent permissible in art. Do not you think that sexual intercourse imitation of Stalin and Hitler, to put it mildly, somewhat beyond the scope of "permitted to open display" (I stress that no call to ban and close around my place). After all, nobody comes (so far, at least) to organize a performance of "Leningrad" in Tchaikovsky Hall, or Alexander Novikov in the Conservatory.
And besides, I think it is absolutely inadmissible to free entry without age restrictions on such activities.
And about the flies very accurately expressed dedulya37

[artcol]

Сообщение от passers-103835

artcol, from the standpoint of modern art your approach is not entirely correct. The fact that the site you are looking at photos just work out, so to speak, the exposition of context, ie, can not fully become co-author of the conceptual work that is unacceptable to postmodern art.
Excuse me for a sarcasm.

I consider fine. As an indicator of the level of total exposure. Tam and photos can all understand, because I am interested in only a matter of Vladimir, "is there really innovative things among the nominees? Other aspects and effects of modern art (including pure speculation at this point) I personally do not interest - interest is long overdue.
And on your approach in some formalism neophyte breathe

[Glasha]

Сообщение от passers 103835

Here's to innovation-that's just the trouble

That's right, the trouble with innovation - a sense secondary, déjà vu did not leave during the entire tour, with rare exceptions.

Сообщение от passers 103835

I think it is absolutely inadmissible to free entry without age restrictions on such activities.

And this is, in fact, the main issue, leaving these things event - whether this was a warning, or we watched?
because with us was a girl 8 years old, it is with a camera worn around the third floor, independently of us (neupravlyamy process))), and when I looked at the footage ..... it worked conscientiously and was all but particularly careful with the "blue noses", almost every shot on the couch it was filmed, somehow we missed this point, but at the same time, children can only detract from unwanted, switching attention, in order not to emphasize it more, but exhibition of nominees was not easy to do)))
And the children there, by the way, was enough, came with his parents to "cultural event" in the holiday ..

[Прохожий]

artcol, but no, this is not the formalism of a neophyte, but rather, sarcasm man whom all this, well, a funny (if it were not so sad)

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от passers 103835

After all, nobody comes (so far, at least) to organize a performance of "Leningrad" in Tchaikovsky Hall

I think that it is not far off. "Metallica" and a symphony orchestra, "Stones" on the best scenes. Protest today things may become a classic. The scandalous work "Blue Noses" does not cause me nothing but smiles. But it should be understood that the people went to take a bold step with all the odds get into trouble. I. .. 20 years in the books on Russian art of turn of the millennium will be referred to "blue noses" (not to trahychem on the sofas, but at least with the "era of mercy"). Do you have this doubt?

[artcol]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Scandal of the "Blue Noses" do not cause me nothing but smiles. But it should be understood that the people went to take a bold step with all the odds get into trouble. I. .. 20 years in the books on Russian art of turn of the millennium will be referred to "blue noses" (not to trahychem on the sofas, but at least with the "era of mercy"). Do you have any doubts about this?

Quite mb. Artist - a child of his age. And there is a suspicion that the CH - the most authentic. I am impressed by honesty in their work. While looking at it - ugh. But do not blame the mirror Well!