Vekselberg has accused Christie's in counterfeit trade

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Yaya

Igor Guriev, difference in respect to money (and your Vekselberg) indirectly explains why he is rich, and you - no.

But I'm clever and ironic, and you, apparently - no.

Also: you think that wealth and inner harmony are interrelated?
I think the opposite.

Do not see a single rich man, to maintain internal harmony.

Wealth and power, moreover, make a person lonely.
This is a medical fact.

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от uriart

here a matter of principle.
Why can they sell fake, but they are not allowed to return despite the five-year term?!

So vedn uzhno more lokazat that it was a fake. Maybe it does, and the original.

Miscellaneous catalogs fakes is not an argument. So they write that look - it is fake, and hypocritical Tretyakovski experts, the experts of these directories themselves give opinion on false work. If Vekselberg sunetsya the court with this directory, it is 100%fail.

[Игорь Гурьев]

So Comrade Petrov said that great thing that only nature can see that this is not Kustodiev.

Once again: it myself Comrade Petrov could not see half a dozen Shishkins what and humbly confessed.

Just fuckers (type Vekselberg) believe that once an expert, then this type of computer.

And it is not.

Expert in general, in principle, can not have two answers, but three:

1) This Kustodiyev
2) It is not Kustodiyev
3) It can be Kustodiyev, maybe not.

That is, if an honest expert.

A client - to solve.

==========

I do not know, maybe I would have changed his opinion, if I had seen the original, but the reproductions I vekselbergovskaya thing clear love.

Perhaps this is a fairly large expatriate artist mentally wrote it in 20-30-ies.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[Вивьен]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy

Will the examination be set for the court-issue.

That's right, there are countries where the value is signed by the examination of one or more specific individuals who are in this country a positive reputation. The same applies to the restoration. If you see that picture of "touch" just ask the question: "Who?". If not Mr. Smith, thank you do not, because we do not know how to behave in a sheet 10 years after the intervention of Comrade Smirnov. We are please restoration only from Mr. Smith, and expert opinion from Mr. Johnson.

[SergeiSK]

And eventually a wonderful thing. Unless of course Vekselberg loses court. In this case, will be established precedent, when the Russian examination will not be quoted by the court. And then it follows that the Christie's expert on Russian art will be recognized as the most honest and objective. Although I very much doubt the competence of their experts.
We'll have to forget about Grabar, with their illegitimate for two years, the press, the scandalous experts Tretyakov, the humorous examinations GosNIIR, the Russian Museum, which reacted with reverence. And all in orderly rows go to examination at Christie's.
Delusional, of course, the script, but then only in life does not happen ...

[Игорь Гурьев]

I would like to address the problem Vekselberg philosophically.

Here was an artist Kustodiyev Boris.

Not the biggest Russian artist, but popular, popular.

Very nice, but not GREAT.

And far from being the largest Russian draftsman.
And just all the pictures Kustodieva not built on color scheme, and the figure.

But there were many painters not worse. Lacking such a fantasy, but who know how to draw just as good.
For example, George Pozhedaev could draw like better Kustodiev.

And who is George Pozhedaev prices on the background Kustodieva?
But no.

Now suppose that some Pozhedaev, alkaya bread, wrote "based on" Kustodieva picture.

Incidentally, the best in the picturesque and graphic than the Kustodiyev (that, say, Pozhedaeva was a snap).

Now what do we have?

We have what falshak for its picturesque qualities, in contrast to popular belief, does not concede, but on the contrary, surpasses the original source.

Surioznaya situation.

Lesch, you're mind you my opinion, I vserioz.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

We have what falshak for its picturesque qualities, in contrast to popular opinion, not inferior, but, conversely, surpasses the original source.

Anatoly, I understand that sometimes you can translate the theme in a humorous direction, but the price is "based on" 500-1000 U.S. dollars, and "experts" with Christy sold fufel ("explanation"), for 3 lemons, and that's the philosophy ...

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Eugene

Anatoly, I understand that sometimes you can translate the theme in a humorous direction, but the price of the painting" based on "500-1000 U.S. dollars, and" experts "with Christy sold fufel (" explanation ") , 3 lemons, and that's the philosophy ...

But I've mentioned before that oleaster Vekselberg 2,5 lemon - it's like that for me 25 euros proportionally - and 250 mentally.

Che, he panics, then?

Painting something good, and Guriev and Petrov is recognized ...

Or comrade Vekselberg someone thinks to surprise the amount of 2,5 lemon?

Oh, God, are you mine, whichever is ...

[Yaya]

Note from Igor Guriev: Not the most important Russian artist, but popular, popular.
Very nice, but not GREAT.
And far from being the largest Russian draftsman.
And just all the pictures Kustodieva not built on color scheme, and the figure.
But there were many painters not worse. Lacking such a fantasy, but who know how to draw just as good.

"Some strange thoughts flooded into my head become ill poet." Here is an example of this luck ... - Here Riukhin stood up on the platform of the truck and lifted his arm, attacking some reason for anyone not touch the iron man - no matter what step he may have done in life, whatever happened to him, everything was in his favor, all drawn to his glory! But what he did? I do not understand ... Something special is in these words: "Storm haze ..."? I do not understand! .. Lucky, lucky! - Suddenly poisonous concluded Riukhin and felt that the truck under him moved, - shot, shot at him this white guard and shattered his hip and ensured immortality ... "(c)