A. Schilder original or not and the cost

[uriart]

Messer, Arkan normal buyer.
I will take sign.
Can sell with confidence. "

[Причал]

Lord, tell me, it's all a hoax, but ? "And again I believe in humanity <! - ~ 7 ~ ->
There is someone who believes that this picture is not svezhak ?

Have you ever gave the painting to the restoration? You there canvases in need of restoration, at least once on the junk duplicate? or a service some new, for acutely needy <!--~ 10 "->

Schas start telling you that this is not the restorer, and the pope stuck to that found in the pantry. But still evident and that the remake, and that the artist style Schilder poorly studied

[Messer]

the only problem is that I'm in Ukraine ...

Added after 1 minute

Сообщение от Berth

Gentlemen, tell me, it's all a hoax, but ? "Here I go again believe in humanity
There is someone who believes that this picture is not svezhak ?

Have you ever gave the painting to the restoration? You there canvases in need of restoration, at least once on the junk duplicate? or a service some new, for acutely needy <!--~ 10 "->

Schas start telling you that this is not the restorer, and the pope stuck to that found in the pantry. But still evident and that the remake, and that the artist style Schilder poorly studied

Well that's really not right ....

[Art-ort]

This is a typical work of the late A. Schilder.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от lasso

Schilder probably true, but you have to watch! live!. These doublings I met, perhaps it was made in 1920-30th years. Dealer price 20t.d., ready to stand in a queue.

Arkan, work is really like Schilder. But I was still very difficult to convince myself that it was his hand. I posted photos (1, 2) which is clearly visible manner of the artist. Such a characteristic small "hatching" strokes on top of a thin layer of paint deposited earlier. These photos were taken from the works of the late 19 th century (you must be familiar with). 3rd picture with the work of 1906. It also gives an idea of the artist's style. I also posted pictures (4, 5, 6) late works (1915-1919 years), but they (work), even though that is a bit different (in style) from the earlier, still far from that we are discussing. And the overall impression of this picture is not obsessed with it, which must be from the works of the academic school.
 
What is common in these works with the one we are discussing (7)?

[Тютчев]

By the way, judging by the signature discuss the work belongs to the same period as those given by me. That is the end of the 19 th century. How can an artist-academics write so different things (similar in size) in the same period?

Yes, and the signature itself is not very similar to the ones I've seen (although this indirect proof).

[аркан]

Here you might work in your opinion indisputable, and I saw the first two live and despite the availability of securities of the Russian Museum in them strongly doubt. A duplicated canvas, as previously mentioned, could a long time and I do not understand that all cling to this doubling!

[Messer]

Can I move the debate in another direction?
If purely hypothetically imagine that this is all the same Schilder, etc.
then offered money 20k is a good proposal?

[uriart]

Messer, more than!

[Art-ort]

Well, here they convince you? can still search, but laziness