Vanguard: young and perky

[Вивьен]

Originally Posted by artcol

Does anyone know that shown in the third picture?

Wikipedia:
"Bulbulyator", Bong (from Thai "baung" - "water pipe") - a device for smoking (usually - cannabis and tobacco, etc.).
The main differences of Use bong smoking cigarettes and pipes are the fact that the smoke cools before entering the smoker's lungs, passing through the water. Distributed as manufacturing bongos and manufacture similar devices on the basis of the structure in the home. Bottle plastic and cigarette foil, often used for making bong, when heated, emit toxic substances, extremely hazardous to health.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Vivien

a device for smoking

By the principle of treatment?

[Вивьен]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

According to the principle of treatment?

Structure and working principle similar to usual bong hookah bongs but usually smaller in size, in addition, smoking with the help of bong do not require lengthy manipulation of the coal and kindling, in contrast to the hookah.

Добавлено через 2 минуты
That bong on the picture number 6. And the one that on a canvas of a young and perky - a homemade version.

[Вивьен]

That bong on the picture number 6. And the one that on a canvas of a young and perky - a homemade version.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by Vivien

bong

I, balbesina, look at the inscription "Hookahs, bongos, and think-that is done, then you and the hookah, then you and bongos. You sit, smoke and Bongo rhythm beats back ...

[public]

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

I, of course, there are "pets"-authors from Ukraine.
But it is not young authors.
They are already quite well known and do not know how much they now look lively.

No, I'm just not in the theme of modern Ukrainian art, just try this on "enter", but because I look and read more.
I'm afraid that specifically for young authors, I will not say much.

And who of famous artists you like? Maybe you can find a little time to tell why they show what most of you had to taste. Thanks in advance

Added after 14 minutes

Originally Posted by SAH

I would not say that I like or dislike the creativity Sh just what I saw I did not "shall", not mine. I have a steady, calm attitude, but it's not mine.

Thank you for your honest answer. I understand what you are when you say "not mine". In general, something from the works of contemporary authors do you like?

Posted 17 minutes later

Originally Posted by artcol

Does anyone know that shown on the third picture?

yes, it is water bulbulyator. useful thing in life. is inclined to believe those who smokes

Posted 1 hour 1 minute
[QUOTE=Fed;888762] You know very well that every man sees what he wants to see. Again, we appreciate the picture on the basis of our requests psihoemotsionalnom plan. If you get the pleasure of scales, the picture or something, then the minority, unfortunately, evaluate contemporary art from a position of relevance. Here, I must say that many works of those that I have laid out, meet me in spirit - is a dynamic, ever-changing reality, the symbols of time in which I live. I can watch the work of recognized masters 16-18 century in the museum, to admire, but to have these works, I would not want to. How would you explain it properly ... I want to surround themselves with things real, relevant, and not the museum, separated from the present day. In fact, nothing centuries later does not change, but on the other hand - look at the work Shubina. I do not think so? I find. I find the smell of hair, when I look at working with a close-up neck. I did not find when I look at the work of Titian. This is a special feeling when you can feel the work. When the author refers the spirit of the times, maybe not always correct from the standpoint of pictorial practice, I understand that the work or the author - me.

Well, "gresivnoe manifestation of primitivism and vulgarization" I am to understand myself as a waiver of nagramozhdeniya surplus meanings and a departure from the long aesthetization Supertask art.

I am not an apologist for creativity Masha Shubina. Frankly, I myself originally also hostile to this author with the same language as you. While I have not come to understand that painting and contemporary art, even at a medium - the canvas - this is not the same thing. And, of course, there can not remember how Gelman, once said, "When you look 1 thousand works, you become a connoisseur, 2-3 thousand - an expert - and so Here, I agreed with him, because it really is. This does not affect your personal preference, but at least it gives you answers to many questions about the artistic practice

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Originally Posted by public

And who of famous artists you like?

I like the artists, whose creative peak came in 60-80-e gg ..
Alexander Roitburd, Leo Mezhberg, Aleksand Anufriev, Valentin Khrushch, Lyudmila Hawk.
Here, somehow ...
Nothing original, many of these authors can be called.
A very young I did not know, honestly.
I say so, already tested by time interesting.

[public]

Originally Posted by VYACHESLAV

Mr. public, that brings creators and causes to be like each other just obscene? There are five pairs of paintings by nine different avtorov.Sravnenie can continue, but no desire to spend time. if sense to buy all a flat monotony of copying each other?

I do not know what you find here connects - could that this painting? then yes - all the authors are similar in technique.

Added after 11 minutes

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzransky

I like the artists, whose creative peak came in 60-80-e gg ..
Alexander Roitburd, Leo Mezhberg, Aleksand Anufriev, Valentin Khrushch, Lyudmila Hawk.
Here, somehow ...
Nothing original, many of these authors can be called.
A very young I did not know, honestly.
I say so, already tested by time interesting.

Wow! Hey, this is all Odessites! I have a suspicion that the Odessa - not the least of your life takes.

Roitburd ... The dilemma I have with him. Some work like, some - tasteless. In principle, each author's case, but this author a lot of naked konyukturschiny

[sector]

Fortunate enough to own two works of Alexander Panasenko

[sector]

Second job