Rate it now Konchalovsky

[mihailovoh]

Eugene
This high level of expert council will definitely answer.

[Amateur]

Сообщение от redbor

And the painting itself, still very similar to the original.
At least in the photo cards from 1985.

Checked out your picture, redbor, communications (№ 24) in the stereoscope. We had to make a correction on the size, rotation, inclined plane and distortion. Removed color, so as not to interfere. As a result, an exact match image has not been attained, ie images are not identical . But the result is interesting - has turned quite decent stereo pair with a good surround effects! On such a plot (where the long-range plan is insulated) customary photocopying is also possible to obtain, but only a cunning way bending the original, or apply a lens with a pronounced curvature of the off-center field. So I am more inclined to it - a copy, made by the artist. How? I can not say, perhaps, the author of the original, but maybe not ... We must look smear, and is best to send a good photo Fund Konchalovsky.

[Eriksson]

love my Carl XVI Gustaf, love.

He, of course, eccentric (to put it mildly), but decent and kind man. Its all love here. And his wife - beautiful and clever, and the children have turned out wonderful .

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от Amateur

I am more inclined to it - a copy, made by the artist. How? I can not say, perhaps, the author of the original, and maybe not ... We must look smear, and is best to send a good photo Fund Konchalovsky.

Konchalovsky itself copied? Besides old age, a year before his death? It is extremely doubtful.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Eriksson, considering the still life Konchalovsky 55-year: "It is or is not it?"

[Eriksson]

Cyril Syzransky,

[Seriy]

how rarely packed Staples ... something left ...

[Eriksson]

Dear Amateur, while you are practicing with steroskopom and dismantled what was what, by post, edit the first post and orally izbrazhenij brand.
The issue has become a semi-approval ...
I do not like to think of people's eyes is bad, but something seems to me that this whole discussion - a way to draw maximum attention to the questionable picture for sale. Moreover, neither the photos back side, no major plans for participants in the debate because of Trofim never came.

[luka77]

Сообщение от Eriksson

[I]

Konchalovsky itself copied? Besides old age, a year before his death? It is extremely doubtful.

That's where the truth, gentlemen, how absurd it all is, if Konchalovsky be decided shortly before his death to repeat his picture (which I very much doubt), it has still not led to a precise repetition of up to millimeters of all the details of the plot (if it is only weakly did so well or so after the death of the heirs is not very abusive to each other, which I also doubt) IMHO

[Eriksson]

The great thing - the Internet!

Here is found. Dated - a year ago.
One author and two interesting questions.

Sami compare themselves decide ...

http://otvet.mail.ru/question/19744207/

http://otvet.mail.ru/question/19121544/

[artcol]

Сообщение от Eriksson

The great thing - the Internet!

Here is found. Dated - a year ago.
One author and two interesting questions.

Sami compare themselves decide ...

http://otvet.mail.ru/question/19744207/

http://otvet.mail.ru/question/19121544/

I am shocked by your abilities!