Lanskoy

[Dima]

РљРеСЂРеР "R" РЎС <Ð ° Ð · РЅСЃРєРеР №,


quality of the pictures are too large, so the only thing he could think of, but like this - http://disk.tom.ru/pckct

[SergeiSK]

In the work of early Lansky occur more or less realistic work, but still with a touch of impressionism. The work presented by this Dima strange. At least the inscription on the back of his hand made no Lansky. As an abstract Lanskoy formed in 1930-ies Here is the picture in 1927, ie already emigrant Lansky and then signed it already so: "LANSKOY", but not in Russian. I am not an expert, but this Lanskoy in my opinion ambiguous. Here are a couple of his early works, not yet exposed to non-objective abstract art.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Dima, I do yasno.Spasibo that gave the link to see the "Marochko." I saw these at fuflyakah.I long walk they prostoram.I your "Lanskoy" from the same barrel, then a my underlining on the back seemed familiar.
Here, I'm sure many saw canvases (without stretchers) with such "Marochko.
Ostensibly Yakovlev, Kuprin, Bogomazov etc. etc.
You-fuflyak otherwise-poddelka.Vse.Tochka.RU

[color="# 666686"]Added after 13 minutes[/color]
http://forumuuu.com/showthread.php?t=72624
For primera.Pohozhe?
That's all they are and "Marochko" odinakovye.Tolko provenance, the legend varies.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 15 minutes[/color]
SergeiSK, you too have seen such confident.

[SergeiSK]

Cyril Syzransky,
Bravo Gold!
I was not uneasy doubt that somewhere I have seen such a label. Here Cyril exactly all and identified. These works go on artrynku with the names of Cluny, Grigoriev, Yakovlev, Parks, etc. Here are a few samples of forgeries:

[Кирилл Сызранский]

SergeiSK, and all the context of this forum, decent people, interesting messages, themes ... It is on this wave, and not just "vedesh" in such "Marochko.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
Me names like in your photos: "type Kliun", "type Grigoriev.

[SergeiSK]

Cyril Syzransky,
Hm .... Involuntarily remember Kozma Prutkov: "Behold the root!"
And an interesting provenance: "... the owner went to Israel and when he returns is unknown ..." Probably for the new party "Mashkov", "Tatlin" and "Lansky" go. : D
But in a dispute born truth, we are all nice poobsuzhdali and as a summary - thanks to Cyril, rescued from Dima showdown or ridicule upon delivery of the paintings on the examination.

[Konstantin]

SergeiSK, Cyril Syzransky,
Thank you, have fun. The fact that it is not Lanskoy was clear immediately. But what is behind this - very informative. And by the way, people who pass it off as Lansky, and others are counting on that? Not far from the arts to the people?

[Dima]

Hm, well ... However, inclined to believe it ... a nice course malo.Deystvitelno thank you from the shame! But that's one thing not clear to me how people might be interested in this picture, yet ready to buy it for that kind of money? "The fact that the conversation took place in person with me for about a year ago ... can it be" experts "painting did not understand that it is fuflyak?

[Евгений]

Сообщение от LCR

Go to Sasha Borovsky in GRM, say that a Nana Roginskaya requests him to help you

Liana nothing you give such advice ..

[Dima]

Another question: it turns out that all so-called "work" marked a "Marochko" fake! It is interesting, but how do undertook then this "Marochko"? For what purpose and where it can attach a picture? It turns out that if there is a now "Marochko", the picture clearly forged! Hence, there is some sort of a firm that engaged in this and who at that time it is targeted? Unclear ....: confused:

P.S. Sorry, that question is not about Lansky, just very interesting to here about this mysterious "Marochko" ... origin in general this?