Edward Steinberg in "Gallery Romanov. Exhibition "The experience of Thanksgiving. Photos

[Vladimir]

Pavel, this topic is already attracting around 900 people and will be watching, because this photo essay from the exhibition of significant artworks. I understand that the forum - it is still a place for discussion (in contrast to the Duma Gryzlov version). But any discussion must be based on issues theses facts. The allegations, conjectures, reasoning about other people's contracts without sufficient knowledge reduces the level of debate and discourage the desire to have Dlouhy participate in the discussions. Deliberately or not, but you help that this (judging from the development of the theme from the photo essay show Tavasieva, Steinberg). I urge you all so very balanced approach to their performances. And when something does not like it, it would be good to argue. Rely on your understanding.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Eugene

Paul you I am not arguing, I'm just stating the facts and vse.Vam to artists who are represented in the "Gallery of Romanov, as to the moon walk ..
What then discuss the meaning of no luck.

One says that I tselyu in court painter, the other kait me as an artist, a third just a fan. Zhenya, you pretend that you do not understand me, though I speak Russian. Take the magazine Art Institute of America, one number in the year posveschaetsya galleries. Each gallery is on the contract artists. It's not even that. To help you pay large sums of money and felt good, one must trust. Until you have convinced me, and all in all clean, and it muveton. I seek only this. No need to worry about me. Exhibitions of this work to the artist. I will be displaying where I want, because they have something to stand and have fans on my painting.
I do not like Steinberg for monotony and dullness. He does not stand comparison with the great, but it's my opinion. You can refute him, prove that I am wrong. And do not you judge someone by someone to the moon, if you can not make a simple analysis of art criticism.
Vladimir, I seek the facts, analysis, interesting sayings, interesting topic, which determines whether our gallery owners seriously in the west, and thus raise prices, or once again branded criminals. yet only in response to abuse. Bad!
Steinberg do the same on a contract with Bernard-fact or not fact. In your place I would not generally advertise this exhibition, commercial clear. So, I discuss what you found and draw conclusions from the facts.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 9 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от fross

Pavel in the excitement of hunting for a place by the court artist had forgotten that all these places are still busy and not those whom he so viciously criticized .

You're wrong. Bad! Disprove my vitriolic criticism. A strange notion of discussion. When moving to the individual means are wrong, they say a fool himself.: Shy:

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Pavel

One says that I tselyu in court painter, the other kait me as an artist, a third just a fan. Zhenya, you pretend that you do not understand me, though I speak Russian.

Let's all take himself in hand and will continue to talk about creativity without moving to the individual. It happens that you want to send someone a link to the photo essay. And then you look - in the discussions at first well, and then dries up and the theme begins shame and disgrace.
  

Сообщение от Pavel

In your place I would not generally advertise this exhibition, commercial clear.

So I did this once wrote, show business, things are sold. It is much more interesting than just watch. The site is so pro-investment in art, literate about buying, but not about the net "profit" arts. Many, for example, like Mikhail Vrubel, but it will not be available ... never, for any money.

Сообщение от Pavel

interesting topic, which determines whether our gallery owners seriously in the west, and thus raise prices, or once again branded criminals.

You seriously think so?

[Pavel]

His view, I said.

[LCR]

So, to put an end to all sorts of insinuations: yesterday I called the gallery of Claude Bernard and asked if Moscow to see things Steinberg, what do I very politely replied that right now there is his show.

I understand that sorrowful Pavlik his message: there is no scandal in perspective does not see it, drive Steinberg Bernard absolutely no intention, so that he can only continue obtyrivat famous artists (no wonder he has such a name, Tyrishkin) in the hope that all the same when something someone somewhere will expel, and for him freed place

[Pavel]

Сообщение от LCR

So, to put an end to all sorts of insinuations: yesterday I called the gallery of Claude Bernard and asked if Moscow to see things Steinberg, what do I very politely replied that right now there is his show.

I understand that sorrowful Pavlik his message: there is no scandal in perspective does not see it, drive Steinberg Bernard absolutely no intention, so that he can only continue obtyrivat famous artists (no wonder he has such a name, Tyrishkin) in the hope that all the same when something someone somewhere will expel, and for him freed place

I am very glad that Steinberg was a decent man and all so well. Long had to seek an explanation. I rvus to any gallery, is important for me to contract terms at me so well. So plu Kalm Madame.: Cool:: shy:

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Pavel, it is you need more Kalma when discussing colleagues.

[Pavel]

What's going on Kirill?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

What's going on Kirill?

That's what.
You are advised

Сообщение от Pavel

plu Kalm Madame.

I advise you.
Komprone vu?

[Pavel]

Zhe always compromise. I do not trade and I do not care about reputation, but I find it strange that no one raised this issue before me. I begin to doubt the competence.
How about abstraction at the Van Gogh?