Auction "Epoch", Kiev, 30.05.2009

[Tana]

vyadem and really did not like Lomykina! and what history at work?

[Altim]

Сообщение от Tana

and what history at work?

History usual: it was not Lomykin - became Lomykin Just kidding.

[vyadem]

Tana, I have no idea ... I only know that came up for auction from a man who bought it in Europe ... can not really Lomykin ... but more inclined that just early.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Сообщение от vyadem

Tana, I have no idea ... I only know that came up for auction from a man who bought it in Europe ... can not really Lomykin ... but more inclined that just early.

Lomykin C. Lot 78. Initially, trimmed here http://www.nt-art.net/index.php?l=RU...&artist=75
"Kovalenko" Lot101?? Walked all online auctions ......, was at this forum.
"Strel'nikov VV" Lot70 ???," Sychev S. "Lot 91 ???," Khrushchev?? -without comment.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Altim

Who would say that this is one artist? Linens, first - 75h130, 1980, the second - 60x80, 1975. Photo quality is not very, because it scans the certificates.

Not my rules to assess the work, but on individual syuansam and the first work feels Stolyarenko hand, although the color, of course, deadly. Size 75h130 it is not typical, but apparently, this is custom work ... Peter can Kuzmitch show and he will tell the story

[Дмитрий Спец]

Lomykin highly questionable, even for the early period. Sheluto NA "Chekhov's house", except that house Chekhov, is the only thing that's a fact!

[Altim]

Сообщение от Buscador

Not in my rules to assess the work, but on individual syuansam and in the first work arm feels Stolyarenko, although the color, of course, deadly. Size 75h130 it is not typical, but apparently, this is custom work ... Peter can Kuzmitch show and he will tell the story

In this work, no questions, provenance I know, she really custom and stayed there for 20 years on one wall. Colors on both pics distorted because the images scanned with a laminated certificate - tried something dokrutit in primitive editor, but it turned out how it happened.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Altim

Who would say that this is one artist? Linens, first - 75h130, 1980, the second - 60x80, 1975.

Your second, was at the time of my: rolleyes: About Stolyarenko say.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 9 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Dmitry Special

Sheluto NA "Chekhov's house", except that house Chekhov, is the only thing that's a fact!

It is doubtful? As for me, normal operation, this

[Art-lover]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

That's four days on Gelos will be sold this painting. Oil on canvas, 60h88 cm, 1959. Estimate approximately $ 4000. Stolyarenko it and whether the picture that kind of money?

Сообщение от Altim

I think it is not Stolyarenko. Is it that time of training in children's art studio in the city of Feodosia.
Here 20 works, compare, no one in the series becomes: http://www.korners.com.ua/russian/painters/254

I disagree with such a categorical judgment. The coloring of recognizable stolyarenkovsky - we must distinguish the individuality of color mixtures, inherent in an artist's palette. Work may well belong to the brush Stolyarenko, and if it is a fake - a good one.
If it were not for the poor condition of the canvas, the assessment work would approach esimeytu discussed recently pictures "Brig" auction " Nu-Art ". On the artistic quality of the pictures are comparable - except that "Brig" is more-designed, and the picture with Gelos - written in a more rapid manner, which, incidentally, corresponds to the nature of work (broken water).

[Самвел]

Сообщение от Altim

I think it is not Stolyarenko. Is it that time of learning in children's art studio in the city of Feodosia

For me, this work is much better than the one that you like in this thread. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...405&page=2