Sotheby's pre-auction exhibition in Kiev

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Yaya

Veronic, what conclusions ?...

You are here hinted at the genius. You can talk about talent and genius .... time will tell

[vyadem]

Сообщение от Yaya

genius is not subjective. this is its essence

People are different ... one considers the artist's "genius" other "talented", the third does not consider an artist because he does not like it ... but it's a subjective opinion of everyone ... and everyone has it 100%right and must respect that ... it is impossible to say that man is wrong, because my subjective opinion it ... all different, different thinking, perspective, etc. - And this is very good!

[Yaya]

Altim, that there is no authenticity - plus both times. they focus on the world market. authenticity would have driven them into the local scope. Note: "Buryatka (authenticity shaft) for sale. and "transnational" monkey gone. unauthentic something from them is just sold!

[color="# 666686"]Added a 39 seconds[/color]
Veronic, you, as usual, casually read what I write. but I'm not offended

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Yaya

authenticity drove them to a local scope.

It is this right. (c)
A Buryatka good.

[Altim]

Yaya, the monkey just magnets fun, that's gone. Decorative, I would say All the same, if we use the word "Ukrainian kontemporari" then that means - Ukrainian, in this case? Geographically, it is written in the Ukraine and all? The chip is what? The meaning of separate strings?

[Yaya]

vyadem, the brilliant writer, Nabokov considered genius writer Dostoevsky Balbes. Thus, Dostoevsky, for obvious reasons did not even suspect the existence of a severe attack. Nevertheless, they both objectively brilliant writer, if only because that their genius is recognized throughout the civilized (and not so) world. not to mention other "indicators".
What I want to say? There are objective criteria for assessing genius hud.proizv. Especially when there is a historical retrospective. And the subjective opinion of it has nothing to do. Just as not relevant to the genius of Dostoevsky's view of him tov.Nabokova.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
Altim, we live in an age of globalization. the era of nation-states is over. is part of the modern phyla. discourse. You probably know about it? ..

[Veronic]

Сообщение от Altim

Yaya, the monkey just magnets fun, that's gone. Decorative, I would say All the same, if we use the word "Ukrainian kontemporari" then that means - Ukrainian, in this case? Geographically, it is written in the Ukraine and all? The chip is what? Meaning in a separate string?

But seriously ... who left, who bought it, why? These are all questions still remain behind the scenes game called Sotheby's. Although once again that a good start!

[Altim]

Yaya, the story of Dostoyevsky and Nabokov in your presentation sounded like something harmsovskoe But still, a genius - this is the man himself as he is, and not the sum of opinions about it.

[Yaya]

Altim, then called a genius can be any of us.
Brilliant that people agree to take such. If we (in a very broad sense) do not agree about the genius of Art. X, it will exist outside the human "brilliant" systems of coordinates. Perhaps it will be brilliant. But it would be genius for anyone. Because of her no one will know. And only our estimate (mankind) will mark thin. X in a coordinate system in which it will be considered a genius.

[Вивьен]

Yaya, so you write that the definition genilnosti may not be in the nature of subjective opinions, in particular the views VYADEMa, that genius - it is generally accepted figure. Such as the quotation in the international market, for example. But the international market - is actually fairly narrow range. If you take the entire population of planet Earth and to hold opinion poll, how many people in percentage terms, acknowledge the genius of an artist? How many people - so much and opinions. The other judge, except for history, there really is not.