New realism, USA

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Pavel

Please Luciana Freud's work from the Getty Foundation

Cunning, kid, you were asked to lay out their work, and not from the fund of the greedy American billionaire. : p: p

[fross]

Сообщение от OlgaV

No Frosechka!
This applies only to Paul, because there was not a single theme (exaggeration, of course) not criticized them from the position of "I am an artist, but this ..."
Therefore we ask the artist: the work - for an encore!
We must also understand on what people bases its krrrriticheskie comments.

Maybe I carelessly read, but I remember he was very praising Hockney and Freud he likes. And then, it's his personal opinion and not a sentence. That's what the forum to express different points of view.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от fross

Now everyone who wishes to express its views should show their work? Under such circumstances, the whole forum and silent for a long time. And the remaining rename it hud.sovet.

1
Recognized by the world's leading artists - a public person who chose that path. So let them suffer and keep blow media criticism. They do not care that the elephant pellet, and we - the pleasure and entertainment. But the installation "time criticizing, the show itself, it seems to me not correct. Validating not all crave publicity and privacy violations such comfort - the same position.

[IrinaC]

Сообщение от OlgaV

All true, but why not show their work?

But, in my opinion, we have strayed from the stated theme.

In Paul's long hung in the profile of his website with his pictures. Why is it removed: confused:

[Pavel]

I have not cleaned.
I am for equality. And you?
Madame! The artist should be able to analyze their own and others' work. Criticizing can kazhdyy.Kritika implies a certain superiority of the critic, who does not have the artist, which should be done, but is constantly questioned. Actually it would be luchshe all, if artists who are able but do not know, worked on the instructions of critics, who, thank God, they know, but do not know how.
I am not criticizing the Paris School.


[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от OlgaV

Dear Paul!
The works of Freud, I have known a long time and in the original, so things will come. You do not Lucien Freud? But your work, I have not seen, which is why your criticism in many themes evoke mistrust.
Let us agree, at first your work, and then critique other artists, trends and schools (especially Paris).

Once again I am not criticizing, I try to understand.
I would be happy to do an exhibition at the Getty Center.

[Евгений]

Apologies to the LCR, which is not on "New Realism, USA

Сообщение от OlgaV

All right, but why not show their work?

If an artist has the desire he shows, as well as make, meaning?
At the forum almost all the artists (who are present here in person) are kindly.
Excluding E. Saran, and then only the fault of a girl (Vechnost), which it unsuccessfully PR.

[Pavel]

Well shown!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Pavel, I like your paintings shown here.
But there is a big "NO". : eek:
It is not the Stalinist! : D
And what size, for example, still life?
Or "Bublikov?

[LCR]

Сообщение от Pavel

Well shown!

Listen, Comrade Morozov, and yet the picture you have is not bad, congratulations

Why did you hang out in the avatar this crap? Remove it and put something out of these here!

Now it is clear why you always write about the great French school of painting - it is clear that you like Bonnard and Vuillard. And Hopper is also a remarkable artist, you are absolutely right: p

The only thing I do not understand is why all these exciting discoveries taking place in the story of the New Realism U.S.. Can also be opened a new theme, as do all the normal people, and put it in their works)))

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Pavel, I like your paintings shown here.
But there is a big "NO". : eek:
It is not the Stalinist! : D
And what size, for example, still life?
Or "Bublikov"?

Bagels have long gone, but the size, like still life 65h81
I've always worked creatively and I did not come near to the mill, and all those "Stalin's work have been made in plant and good artists, and has therefore are very expensive. Paintings by Lenin and Stalin are sold in the summer, so are the artistic value, but now and originality. This I wanted to say.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 4 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от LCR

Listen, Comrade Morozov, and yet the picture you have is not bad, congratulations

Why did you hang out in the avatar this crap? Remove it and put something out of these here!

Now it is clear why you always write about the great French school of painting - it is clear that you like Bonnard and Vuillard. And Hopper is also a remarkable artist, you are absolutely right: p

The only thing I do not understand is why all these exciting discoveries taking place in the story of the New Realism U.S.. Can also be opened a new theme, as do all the normal people, and put it in their works )))

You are wrong in all avotar is my self-portrait and I am quite on it is not bad. More and Matisse. I told you-continuous French influence. But Americans have also traced fr. ow-e. It's interesting to observe and evaluate and know how to evaluate them and compare with his assessment buying removing cream, so they went and licked.
You probably did not see how I stood solid Merikansky same realism, by the way look at hopperovskie posters of the war is on Socialist realism. Bed fight "I knew long ago, Freud opened after a still life, the quality is very close to David Hockney, but much earlier. Americans realism in the blood and is a very interesting topic. Holy Admin forgive, as to the subject expressed a clear interest.