P.Konchalovsky the picture. Assist in the evaluation.

[NATA NOVA]

Cyril Syzran, but this!
both from AAA, really (in my purely subjective opinion) ..
Well, just NO!
(Even though it is difficult to believe that Konchalovsky, he may not, who knows?)

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Well, just NO!
(Even though it is difficult to believe that Konchalovsky, may not ONK-knows?)

But the garden of the 39th, which at Sothebys, e for 91 m long.
gone:

Добавлено через 2 минуты

Сообщение от Toinen

I got to do with it?

You led bragging hard-boiled cynic Mikhalkov, you and your question.

[Pablo]

redbor, you forgive ...
Work is either fake, or at the time did not know how to write ...
> I agree with the

NATA NOVA <! - ~ 3 ~ ->

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Pablo

at the time did not really know how to write ...

In fact, that is not available to your understanding, is not necessarily a bad thing!

[Pablo]

Toinen, well, not the fact that everyone present at the forum is understanding.
Besides, is not the fact that bad for their products is always a client.

[Toinen]

Сообщение от Pablo

Toinen, well, not the fact that everyone present at the forum have an understanding.

I see!

---------

[redbor]

Сообщение от Pablo

redbor, you forgive ... Work is either fake, or at the time did not know how to write ... > I agree with the
NATA NOVA <! - ~ 3 ~ ->

Yes, please forgive ! Just anyone, you or P.Konchalovsky, did not know how to write? >

Pablo! Although I did not ask for attribution, but only estimates pictures , I would like to hear arguments
 (if you have one ) against TG expert opinions , which I posted above. What experts statements do you disagree?

 Or you know the other work under the number 817 P.Konchalovsky ?
Please provide arguments.

[Pablo]

redbor, I have only one argument on this point - like it or not.
This work is frankly weak, in my vzglyad.U a lot of decent work, and this does not fit.

Discovered V. dolls impressive.

[Дилетант]

Good people, why are you still barking so swear! In a vacuum - that place!
Show a picture of Irina Vladimirovna. - And the whole long ...
Irina Vladimirovna something and creativity of the PP Konchalovsky knows well , and even ( unlike many other experts ) distinguishes the work of PP and MP Konchalovsky . >
And in the Fund, as it is known , IV - The leading expert .
( And most importantly , without its opinion on noneshnie Konchalovsky -a-days all one does not sell ... ) > > <! - ~ 7 ~ - >

And the work is, in my opinion - is normal.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Dilettante , 2337661"

And in the Fund, as it is known , IV - The leading expert .
( And most importantly , without its opinion on noneshnie Konchalovsky -a-days all one does not sell ...)

And the work is, in my opinion - is normal.

Work - it is normal, but I do not understand, what's the kind of " Irina ."
I, for example , in the work of AUC understand better than any " Irina ."
And not only them.

True, I do not impose myself to anyone and not going.

And really, who is this mysterious " Irina "?