Fedot Sychkov

[uriart]

I propose the next version.
Let's let everyone would vote on this work that the message number 17.
After all watched this program works Sychkova.
Who has eyes, let him see!
One would think something like ballot boxes and everyone would go left their opinion.
And then to all the views in one fell swoop and laid out in the post.
Must surely ask the moderator to let him make "voters" such urnochku.
We will vote and then he would put the result of voting!
All agree?

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от uriart

all agree?

I think that for such a survey should ask the opinion of the owner of this picture, ie me. But I think it's just ridiculous, because the views of one man, very far from the creation of the same Sychkova, to arrange such a farce. It is better to let him prove to himself that this is not Sychkov, so it will be fair and professional.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Here I looked and looked at the portrait and pretentious, that it does not look like the portraits Fedota Sychkova.
I have not been doing this for the artist "for about five years" and therefore ask the opinion of participants.
What say from this portrait?

I immediately wrote-I do not know, but my amateurish finite Sergei rights, rights, look-at paintings created Fedotov Sychkovym Vasilyevich (1870-1958), picture from the message number 17 does not look like.

[Uri]

Once again I apologize for my eksperement.Davayte stop spor.Rozhdestvo yet! Merry Christmas you all! God bless you, your family and friends.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Uri, I'm sorry, but you obviously missed my request to you in message number 40.
Again, forgive.
you are to me as a connoisseur of creativity Sychkova tell. The message number 17 in this topic portrait-F. Sychkov? Simply, yes or no?

[Tana]

Well, here again, "stag" should be set apart ....
Kirill, I am also not an expert, but I give my "not special" opinion:
  pink cheeks, and touchingly naive way, if I may say so "photographic" - "sychkovskaya" only seems to work as it is not over, in comparison with photographs of paintings, which gave uriart background just no ...
my opinion-Sychkov.

PSMne his landscapes like!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Tana, and expert opinion is, they say.

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от Tana

background simply do not

That's right, this:

Сообщение от SergeiSK

so-called "pure portrait, where the model is depicted in a neutral background.

This is typical of the early period of creativity Sychkova. Among the photographs presented here have two or three of these portraits.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

and expert opinion is, they say.

So snap! Scan this conclusion and to lay out here and all business!

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от dedulya37

scan this conclusion and to lay out here and all business

Why? Justified for the sake of someone else's fun? Like, here's expertise, but the real picture ... And I think everything here is clearly written:

Сообщение от SergeiSK

In this picture there is expert opinion from the State Russian Museum number 3655 \ 1 from 15.12.2004. Purchased by me in the gallery "Russian Seasons" in St. Petersburg from its owner Lebedev VP ...

If someone wants something to find out - call the Russian Museum, and the scan examination is prepared to provide only for serious interest in painting.