Single feature ranking

[artcol]

Сообщение от Amateur , 2315331

Uh-huh. And I also know the terrible story of how nano- dust was literally spoiled all the property of a citizen of the Russian Federation . And judgment is entered in the position of the victim, punish the offender ...
Arm itself enough to not say anything more . And then, God forbid, even some perspective article "State returned to the UK ." For a discussion of articles in the anthology " Northern Flowers " for 1832 , for example ...

This article was not only the year . Prepared a "revolution" he

[Кирилл Сызранский]

By the way, to remove all possible diagnoses delirium:

All the characters and events of my posts are fictional and all the matches are random.

If someone finds themselves in someone of the characters in the messages, all the questions and let them address.


Added after 13 minutes

Сообщение от Dilettante, 2315331

Uh-huh.
And I also know the terrible story of how nano-dust was literally spoiled all the property of a citizen of the Russian Federation.

And I also know that history.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

NATA NOVA, read here and all your questions answered there.

Read (repeatedly).
Much like a dull ..
Tune ..
not clear for what and for whom ..
Where rating itself, then?
..
Not found ..
<- ~ 3 ~ ->

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от artcol

You are a monopolist in the market, there is no alternative to your method, hence the questions. In fact, you can be accused of false advertising.

If only it were so. You publish his private opinion on the merits of various artists, exposing them to possible damage to reputation. I now want to ask you - Do you understand or not?

So there you are more careful with claims to Taryshkinu, bad peace is better than a good lawsuit.

Added after 20 minutes

Here's What a joy ... That's on your side of the fence from United Russia. Hehe

In order to answer specific questions. I am here for this, and not for transshipments.

EXP - not a monopoly, and never have been. Everyone's business - trust EXP or, for example, ratings on the 1st page of this site (though I did not understand how to build in Russia more or less objective and representative data on sales, and Cyril Syzran me this is not explained).

In false advertising who and what can we blame? Repin and Malevich - for what they are in the highest category rating? I do not understand. Please be more specific.

The question is whether the damage to the reputation of the artist assigned to it, such as the rating category 5B, which sounds like "There is a professional artist," did not find a positive solution for 13 years . I will say this: not only is not, but a lot of artists write in his biography: "In a single artistic rating" has been screened 5B - There is a professional artist. "And rating certificates hanging on the wall.
(Description of the rating categories are:
http://artunion.ru/rating/normativ3.htm). Where is the damage to the reputation?

Or, perhaps, is the damage that the artist, in his opinion, deserves a category "4B - held a professional artist, art market demanded," or, for example, 1B, and he was given only a 5V? Somehow, so far no one tried to court to recover their "rights violated" and oblige us to assign 4B instead of 5V. Think about it, why, consult with lawyers.

"You are getting more careful with claims to Taryshkinu" - first, it Tiryshkina, and secondly, I have explained, what are the claims to Tiryshkina, and his view of EXP has nothing to do with it. There is a socially accepted norms of behavior, and they should follow any man, let alone cultural figure.

I am not in favor of United Russia, in fact - hold opposing political views, but a return to the article of the Criminal Code on defamation think is right. Somehow need to slow down rampant rudeness, flowing from the screens and newspapers.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

Where is the rating itself?

It on paper and it should be bought.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

See the Release of his new art of color widescreen comedy film

Comedy this mb and will be released , but a documentary film about how Syzran artdiler business cards ( with a photo , the same ) on ul.Samarskoy handed out , as grit , the same at the box office . gg

[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

He is on paper and it should be bought.

There is an electronic version:

http://artunion.ru/rating/electronic.htm

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

There is an electronic version:

http://artunion.ru/rating/electronic.htm

You live - and learn.
(a)

[artcol]

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

In order to answer specific questions. I am here for this, and not for transshipments.

EXP - not a monopoly, and never have been. Everyone's business - trust EXP or, for example, ratings on the 1st page of this site (though I did not understand how to build in Russia more or less objective and representative data on sales, and Cyril Syzran me this is not explained).

In false advertising who and what can we blame? Repin and Malevich - for what they are in the highest category rating? I do not understand. Please be more specific.

The question is whether the damage to the reputation of the artist assigned to it, such as the rating category 5B, which sounds like "There is a professional artist," did not find a positive solution for 13 years . I will say this: not only is not, but a lot of artists write in his biography: "In a single artistic rating" has been screened 5B - There is a professional artist. "And rating certificates hanging on the wall.
(Description of the rating categories are:
http://artunion.ru/rating/normativ3.htm). Where is the damage to the reputation?

Or, perhaps, is the damage that the artist, in his opinion, deserves a category "4B - held a professional artist, art market demanded," or, for example, 1B, and he was given only a 5V? Somehow, so far no one tried to court to recover their "rights violated" and oblige us to assign 4B instead of 5V. Think about it, why, consult with lawyers.

"You are getting more careful with claims to Taryshkinu" - first, it Tiryshkina, and secondly, I have explained, what are the claims to Tiryshkina, and his view of EXP has nothing to do with it. There is a socially accepted norms of behavior, and they should follow any man, let alone cultural figure.

I am not in favor of United Russia, in fact - hold opposing political views, but a return to the article of the Criminal Code on defamation think is right. Somehow need to slow down rampant rudeness, flowing from the screens and newspapers.

Let us not dissemble. For if it was done "right", then no one would have been no complaints.
Answer point by point:
1) Monopoly. You can name at least one analog your rating? Links to this site ratings are not correct, because prices reflect sales, not some opinion. There is a fact, there are numbers, display the numbers in order ubyvaeniya. All. I hope the difference is clear.
2) Unfair advertising. Your rating is called "One thin. Rating." Here's to you excerpts from the website of the FAS:

considered unfair advertising, which is:

Читать дальше... 

1) has an invalid comparison with the advertised product in circulation of goods, which are produced by other manufacturers or sold by other sellers;
2) denigrates the honor, dignity or business reputation of a person, including a competitor;
3) is a product advertising, advertising of which is prohibited by this method at this time or in this place, if it is carried out under the guise of advertising another product, trademark or service mark which is identical or similar to the point of confusion with the trademark or service mark of the goods, For advertisements that meet all the requirements and limitations, as well as a form of advertising the manufacturer or seller of such goods;
4) is an act of unfair competition under the antitrust laws.

Article 1 of the Federal Law of March 13, 2006 N 38-FZ "On Advertising", paragraph 2 of Art. 1 of the Federal Law of 26 July 2006 N 135-FZ "On Protection of Competition"

The concepts of unfair competition and improper advertising, fixed by law, also largely overlap.
We note that the concept of "unfair competition" in Russian law <2>, no explicit list of acts that are attributable to unfair competition. Interactions described as unfair competition must meet all of the following criteria:
--------------------------------
<2> Paragraph 9 of article. 4 of Federal Law N 135-FZ "On Protection of Competition".

- Should be directed to benefit for a business;
- Contradict the Russian law, business traditions, the requirements of fairness, reasonableness and fairness;
- Caused or may cause damage to competitors, or has been or may be harmful to their reputation.

Furthermore, the word "single" sets discriminate against those ratings, who in the name of the word no. But this fact, we will not pay attention and get to the words.
3) Though you are not in favor of United Russia, but the methods of plugging Well you have about the same. This prof. forum, and it so happens that there are virtually no censorship, and many participants say their claims do not always make out a legally appropriate manner. In fact, you want to find fault in form but not in fact, because of the use words, and do not understand what is funny, what is there some reasonable members to tell you. Well - it is your right. Dark Syzran can listen, but I'm telling you as a person more familiar with such matters - laugh and alienated many, and the result of the court will most likely not in your favor. That's it.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

That's it.

Political strategist now certainly planted the artist.


Although the service we need for the road

But for her not everyone is able to take:

God forbid contact with the fool!

Obliging fool is more dangerous enemy. (a)


Sadly ...