Elena Basner - arrest of a respected expert! Your opinion?

[Маруся]

And I would have removed, in order to avoid ambiguous situations, while attending the court.
Or at least asked if "serg_str" that he thinks about it:

Сообщение от Artem

two posts signed "serg_str" from 28 - 29 July 2010 from the website artinvestment.ru.

My correspondent claimed that the posts were written sirro has been

[Grigory]

Сообщение от Маруся

And I would have removed, in order to avoid ambiguous situations, while the court

Delete so this theme! Because it is written by the participants of the process...

[Маруся]

Well that's up to You...

Everyone has the right to write under a pseudonym or your real name, but to reveal the aliases without the consent of the author.

[redbor]

[QUOTE="Маруся;3431451"] reveal aliases without the author's consent no kogo@ And can explain why?

[Grigory]

PS I Want to remind that the topic is not about how Marusya "likes" COP....
All manifestations of "love" - in the PM! The rest is not interesting...

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от redbor

And can you explain why?

Oddly enough, the question is not simple. Here's why. To reveal the alias has no right to the one who took the responsibility to take it with him to act, for example, the publisher of the book or the site moderator.
But there may be times when the audience "its course" will know who is who... And the audience, i.e. all who concealed the name of, any such obligations is not taxable...

[redbor]

The question, again, was very simple. And the answer is simple and unequivocal.
The obligations of the speech was not.
Everyone knows: the obligations committed must necessarily be followed.

[Маруся]

Сообщение от K-Maler

Reveal the alias has no right to the one who took the responsibility to take it with him to act, for example, the publisher of the book or the site moderator.
But there may be times when the audience "its course" will know who is who... And the audience, i.e. all who concealed the name of, any such obligations not subject to...

No, not so, "know" and "to reveal/to disclose" - two big differences. "Know" is possible without the consent of the author, and even to communicate to the other in a private conversation, but the "reveal" or "to disclose", i.e. publicly announced in the media - nobody. And the journalist ZOLOTONOSHA whose name resembles an alias, it must be well known.

For reference: article 19 and 1265 of the civil code
"5. Harm caused to a citizen as a result of a violation of his right to the name or nickname shall be compensated in accordance with this Code."

System GARANT: http://base.garant.ru/10164072/3/#ixzz3YmlnUMZP

On the procedure of protection of moral rights, which include the right to aliases.

[Питер-С]

Sankt-Peterburgskie Vedomosti (6 may 2015)
"Counted the teeth"

The investigation of the Russian Museum gives another perspective on the scandal of the antique market

This market is closed and opaque. I decided scandals make out. Therefore, the history of the collector Andrey Vasilyev, bought a fake work by Boris Grigoriev "restaurant" (mixed media, gouache and watercolor on cardboard) and provoked around personal unhappiness a great noise, attracting the attention of journalists and the public so far, in the past few years.

In short, the collector did not want to spend money on expertise, took the risk and lost. Lost my temper, accused the private troubles all around, from the art critic Elena Basner caught involved in the transaction, the Russian Museum, the walls of which is the original copy of his unsuccessful acquisition...

Vasilyev has not once been denied to Institute proceedings for lack of corpus delicti. He pressed on, persevered, and was able to interest the result and even more journalists. As a result, in the Dzerzhinsky district court are hearing on this case. Basically it turns out, where, when and how could be made a copy from work for more than three decades in the Museum.

Participants do not skimp on the interview. Outside observers share their assumptions, are often fantastic. Only Russian Museum remains "above the fray".

However, its very convincing point of view on this story is at the head of the restoration Department of the Museum of Eugene Soldatenkov. This version was born as the result of a careful study of the original work Grigoriev "Paris cafe" ("the restaurant"), stored in the Russian Museum and magazine reproductions, published in 1914, and copies belonging to the collector.
Read more

[redbor]

In both! Dear judge E. Basner distinguished collector A. Vasiliev,
as the last of the Loch, had sold under the guise of a masterpiece weak, but skillfully aged, student work